weststigers
Well-known member
Kul has it good....convinced them all he pays the bills so they should work for nothing. He forgot to tell them he keeps the profits too 😅I think Suze was offering to do some more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kul has it good....convinced them all he pays the bills so they should work for nothing. He forgot to tell them he keeps the profits too 😅I think Suze was offering to do some more.
You’d be right if companies didn’t have policies in place around social media use, normally role modelled top down.Not really though.
Only Fans & Instagram are not 'illegal'.
What you're trying to do is shame someone. Because they don't follow the same code of ethics as you do.
Unless he's waving pictures of naked women in your face or around the office, he should be free to look at whatever he likes.
If YOU choose to go onto his social media to find who & what he follows (which you need to actually look for- it's not blaring in your face if you go onto someone's Instagram) then that is a choice YOU made.
Unless, along with his #Richoout! posts he's attaching photos of young women in various suggestive West's Sloths football gear, I'd say it's probably closer to 'invasion of privacy' than it is to 'public nuisance'...
There is zero conflicting messaging.Seems like a lot of conflicting messaging really. I wouldn't want the rally to lead to the clubs dissolution.
And yes, I am female.
So did I.Maybe you've heard it, but honestly I doubt it.
I doubt he'd have a go at Gus the way he did on his own show.
The only agenda Chammas has is to make money for his employer. I haven't followed him for long but been following a lot of his podcasting and written articles. He's actually been presenting facts.
I hate using this word but I actually feel he has some "journalistic integrity".
Ive used the ignore function for the first time this week, partly because I feel bad for you guys hahaha.YES! If you see a post that we need to moderate (edit, delete, warn, suspend, ban) PLEASE hit the report button. Too easy. We get the actual post sent to us and we can deal with it. No trolling back through pages of posts to try and find the right one! And if someone is irritating you to tears, hit the ignore button, and you don't have to see any more of their gibberish!
Report and Ignore are your friends <3
Honest question- is it a HBG account? Or a private account? I can't be bothered looking myself, but I can't imagine HBG are rocking Instagram. If it's a private account, on a personal phone- like I said....to see who someone 'follows' you need to go into their profile, click on the tab for who they follow, scroll down....it's not exactly 'in your face'You’d be right if companies didn’t have policies in place around social media use, normally role modelled top down.
Mate I actually don’t agree with these policies but they are in the world. And senior management make these rules up. It’s absolutely not good for him.Honest question- is it a HBG account? Or a private account? I can't be bothered looking myself, but I can't imagine HBG are rocking Instagram. If it's a private account, on a personal phone- like I said....to see who someone 'follows' you need to go into their profile, click on the tab for who they follow, scroll down....it's not exactly 'in your face'
Has a little bit of a 'witch hunt' feel to it.Mate I actually don’t agree with these policies but they are in the world. And senior management make these rules up. It’s absolutely not good for him.
The digging around his personal insta - yesHas a little bit of a 'witch hunt' feel to it.
Don't have a problem with Part BThe digging around his personal insta - yes
Holding him to account for WT decisions- no bloody way, play on.
He posts HBG stuff on itHonest question- is it a HBG account? Or a private account? I can't be bothered looking myself, but I can't imagine HBG are rocking Instagram. If it's a private account, on a personal phone- like I said....to see who someone 'follows' you need to go into their profile, click on the tab for who they follow, scroll down....it's not exactly 'in your face'
It’s in the public domain now and will get used. Fair or not fair, it’s the reason for the policy.Don't have a problem with Part B
If someone uses Part A in the argument though...
Suzie told me. She knows....now I know...and of course, now you also know.Stalker.
Are you Russell Smith?
I mean, by now, it's common knowledge.Suzie told me. She knows....now I know...and of course, now you also know.
What is HB Gout anyway? Sounds awful.Suzie told me. She knows....now I know...and of course, now you also know.
The guy follows gamer girl pee accounts, that is a whole lot different to the onlyfans scam girls posting photos in bikinisNot really though.
Only Fans & Instagram are not 'illegal'.
What you're trying to do is shame someone. Because they don't follow the same code of ethics as you do.
Unless he's waving pictures of naked women in your face or around the office, he should be free to look at whatever he likes.
If YOU choose to go onto his social media to find who & what he follows (which you need to actually look for- it's not blaring in your face if you go onto someone's Instagram) then that is a choice YOU made.
Unless, along with his #Richoout! posts he's attaching photos of young women in various suggestive West's Sloths football gear, I'd say it's probably closer to 'invasion of privacy' than it is to 'public nuisance'...
Why do you know this?The guy follows gamer girl pee accounts, that is a whole lot different to the onlyfans scam girls posting photos in bikinis
I saw someone post it on TwitterWhy do you know this?
I mean, I know why #weststigers knows it. But why do you know it?
Stalking someone's socials does you no good.I saw someone post it on Twitter