I remember the dog things because I owned a reactive Staffy myself.
When you have a dog like that you never put them in a position where harm can happen if you're any sort of decent human.
I don't get why so many are dropping Mason when he was one of our best.
It can only be because they've taken such a big position against him and can't be wrong.
Nobody has a bigger opinion of Jack Attard than me, but putting him in off of 2 weeks on the sideline in a struggling team would be nuts.
He saved the try because he has no idea how to defend and instead constantly goes for the intercept. He needs to put that away and concentrate on making good decisions and learning.
This game is all about credibility, Wests still have none.
The blokes on SKY made Melbourne a special to score "plenty" against the Tigers.
Even with the injuries and suspensions if the team cops a flogging from a pretty crappy Melbourne team then it's back to square one.
We're still a bit of a...
The Roosters are a disgrace.
Theres's 25 people and a dog watching this game even when they're up the pointy end of the comp.
Replace the useless glitterati with an Ipswich team.
It's the small things that show which team a ref is preferencing.
Tedesco challenges and is proven wrong, but they find a way to let the Roosters keep their challenge , saying that the knock on was inconclusive, even though it was the kick Tedesco challenged not the knock on.
What is it with this club and foot injuries.
More foot injuries than you can poke a stick at.
I'm beginning to think foot injuries is a euphemism.
Does anyone connected with the club use air quotes when they say foot injury? I'm curious to know.
Do we need to employ Dr. Scholl?
Why are so many people suggesting we replace the worst player in our NRL team with Herbert, the worst player in a winning KOE team.
Herbert isn't an option if you want improved defence.