HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

hammertime said:
Given the NRL would love to reduce the Sydney teams, all they'll need is a reason.

Giving the license to the Brisbane Tigers, you would imagine, would be desirable for the NRL.
Click to expand...
That will be the long game the NRL will play, these morons at HBG have no idea what the F they are doing if they think they can rebrand the Tigers with a Magpie they are delusional.

The same organization that has overseen the last 15 years of failure think they'll do a better job with a Magpie on the jumper, seriously these people are dead set imbeciles.
 
cktiger said:
You seriously think the young fans who have grown up only following the Tigers and the black, white and gold are just going to jump ship to different colours and a bird?
Many of them with parents who were Tigers fans who accepted the change 25 years ago?
Delusional.
99% of the fan base would disappear.
You must on the waiting list for a debenture spot.
Click to expand...
Ive at no stage canvased whether it would or wouldn’t work.

Ive simply (and honestly) said as an old Magpie, it works either way for me.

It’ll always have Wests in the title, so happy days 👍

I’m just watching on with popcorn in hand ... play on
 
Lestronge said:
That’s the most self serving bullshit I’ve read on here in a while . We want wests tigers to remain as wests tigers . That brand to remain . Any other is a new identity entirely .
The same people saying it’s just an emblem are the ones who’ve been on here white anting for the last 15 years . Jesus Christ have a look at yourselves
Click to expand...
nailed it mate
 
Lestronge said:
That’s the most self serving bullshit I’ve read on here in a while . We want wests tigers to remain as wests tigers . That brand to remain . Any other is a new identity entirely .
The same people saying it’s just an emblem are the ones who’ve been on here white anting for the last 15 years . Jesus Christ have a look at yourselves
Click to expand...
Is that the royal ‘we’ 🤔
Or is diversity of opinion not allowed ?
 
Lestronge said:
That’s the most self serving bullshit I’ve read on here in a while . We want wests tigers to remain as wests tigers . That brand to remain . Any other is a new identity entirely .
The same people saying it’s just an emblem are the ones who’ve been on here white anting for the last 15 years . Jesus Christ have a look at yourselves
Click to expand...
Don't let him wind you up L, he's probably one of the debenture holders that was chanting magpies, magpies from a Cambo box last season, let him live in his delusional world.
 
Bus 2 Terrigal said:
Ive at no stage canvased whether it would or wouldn’t work.

Ive simply (and honestly) said as an old Magpie, it works either way for me.

It’ll always have Wests in the title, so happy days 👍

I’m just watching on with popcorn in hand ... play on
Click to expand...
Nice try.
You said most people only follow an emblem and yet didn't think it would be a big deal to change from a tiger to a bird…. and that is what I was addressing.
 
diedpretty said:
And HBG graciously allowed Balmain to remain as part of the JV - see i can do that too.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure the only reason HBG brought the debt was to grab control. If they didn't bail out Balmains debt they knew Wests Campbelltown might have. HBG couldn't have that. We should've all read the tea leaves when Wests Campbelltown pulled out of the JV. It wasn't because of Balmain.
 

Under-siege Holman Barnes Group reaches settlement with dumped director Rick Wayde​

The under-siege Holman Barnes Group have one less headache to worry about after reaching a settlement with one their dumped directors who was set to challenge his eight-year ban in court.
https://twitter.com/mcarayannis
December 4, 2025 - 9:30AM
The under-siege Holman Barnes Group have one less headache to worry about after reaching an out-of-court settlement with one their dumped directors.

It is understood that long-term board member Rick Wayde has settled for an undisclosed amount before the case hit the courtroom this month.

Wayde was one of three directors – Tony Andreacchio and David Gilbert- who were sensationally banned on New Year’s Eve. Wayde took legal action to challenge his eight year ban with the case in court in December.

Months later former Holman Barnes chair Julie Romero was suspended for eight years. Holman Barnes have again been in the news this week after they ousted four independent Wests Tigers board members, including chair Barry O’Farrell, to regain control of the football club.


The shock move has also cast a cloud over the future of chief executive Shane Richardson as he mulls over his future at the club. Richardson was closely aligned with O’Farrell and only took the job after the Holman Barnes Group agreed to release control of the club to a board dominated by independent directors.

That went by the wayside this week as HBG wrestled back control of the club, claiming a lack of transparency and communication even though they had to representatives on the board.
 
Bus 2 Terrigal said:
Great post Peno

Strip it all back and many on here simply support an emblem.
Clubs evolve - jerseys change, home grounds can be anywhere, players, coaches they come and go ... and all through that - it’s yay team 👍

But any suggestion that a change be made to that caricature of an animal which sits on the chest of the jersey - and suddenly we’re reaching for the nuclear codes

God people are funny 🤣
Click to expand...
So you want to change the animal, but only by setting us back another 5-10 years from blowing up the board and damaging the club's brand, potentially beyond repair this time.

Jerome already had the clauses, now we'll need to add it for every player moving forward if this knee-jerk bull-shite from directors is not fixed once and for all.

Absolutely ridiculous way to spin this and shows the ineptitude in the way some people think
 
diedpretty said:
HBG can not change the emblem. The licence is Wests Tigers and the NRL aren't going to allow that to change. Thats not my gripe - i can't stand the hypocrites on here who continually keep pushing its not a balmain vs wests thing and then in the next breath say they will walk away if there is no Balmain identity left. They are the same ones who continually abuse anyone who has the temerity to say anything good about the magpies. And yes i'm an old magpies supporter but i know they are never going to be back in the NRL. I'm also appalled at what HBG has done but level headed enough to at least wait and see how this all plays out before i rush off to buy a razor to slash my wrists. Most of my recent comments have been tongue in cheek because i am really having quite a laugh at a lot of the totally unhinged, manic and OTT rants on here.
Click to expand...
Is there any reason you believe that HBG could be justified in what has transpired? Serious question not being fecetious, just love to know your thoughts on it?
 
Harvey said:

Under-siege Holman Barnes Group reaches settlement with dumped director Rick Wayde​

The under-siege Holman Barnes Group have one less headache to worry about after reaching a settlement with one their dumped directors who was set to challenge his eight-year ban in court.
https://twitter.com/mcarayannis
December 4, 2025 - 9:30AM
The under-siege Holman Barnes Group have one less headache to worry about after reaching an out-of-court settlement with one their dumped directors.

It is understood that long-term board member Rick Wayde has settled for an undisclosed amount before the case hit the courtroom this month.

Wayde was one of three directors – Tony Andreacchio and David Gilbert- who were sensationally banned on New Year’s Eve. Wayde took legal action to challenge his eight year ban with the case in court in December.

Months later former Holman Barnes chair Julie Romero was suspended for eight years. Holman Barnes have again been in the news this week after they ousted four independent Wests Tigers board members, including chair Barry O’Farrell, to regain control of the football club.


The shock move has also cast a cloud over the future of chief executive Shane Richardson as he mulls over his future at the club. Richardson was closely aligned with O’Farrell and only took the job after the Holman Barnes Group agreed to release control of the club to a board dominated by independent directors.

That went by the wayside this week as HBG wrestled back control of the club, claiming a lack of transparency and communication even though they had to representatives on the board.
Click to expand...
Really disappointed Rick didn't stick it to them
 
Harvey said:

Under-siege Holman Barnes Group reaches settlement with dumped director Rick Wayde​

The under-siege Holman Barnes Group have one less headache to worry about after reaching a settlement with one their dumped directors who was set to challenge his eight-year ban in court.
https://twitter.com/mcarayannis
December 4, 2025 - 9:30AM
The under-siege Holman Barnes Group have one less headache to worry about after reaching an out-of-court settlement with one their dumped directors.

It is understood that long-term board member Rick Wayde has settled for an undisclosed amount before the case hit the courtroom this month.

Wayde was one of three directors – Tony Andreacchio and David Gilbert- who were sensationally banned on New Year’s Eve. Wayde took legal action to challenge his eight year ban with the case in court in December.

Months later former Holman Barnes chair Julie Romero was suspended for eight years. Holman Barnes have again been in the news this week after they ousted four independent Wests Tigers board members, including chair Barry O’Farrell, to regain control of the football club.


The shock move has also cast a cloud over the future of chief executive Shane Richardson as he mulls over his future at the club. Richardson was closely aligned with O’Farrell and only took the job after the Holman Barnes Group agreed to release control of the club to a board dominated by independent directors.

That went by the wayside this week as HBG wrestled back control of the club, claiming a lack of transparency and communication even though they had to representatives on the board.
Click to expand...
Is the settlement an admission of guilt?
Is that how the law sees it?
 
Bus 2 Terrigal said:
Is that the royal ‘we’ 🤔
Or is diversity of opinion not allowed ?
Click to expand...
If you don’t want what that “ we” is implying then you’re revealing yourself and are on the wrong forum . The “we” has been reiterated soo much that only the most stubborn or those with an agenda need clarification on it .
It’s disgusting watching you people eke out of the shadows . F the kids aye Bus ? fF anyone under 30 who’s literally given their whole life to the wests tigers ? And more importantly F anyone who’s trusted the people who run this club to do what’s in the best interest of the club… shame on us aye … silly fools … And yet the same people who claim Agism and all these other “ism” when asked to account for thier selfish existence , and the same to say F you I’m getting mine … just the world we live in today …. Altruism has become blasphemy .
 
Lestronge said:
That’s the most self serving bullshit I’ve read on here in a while . We want wests tigers to remain as wests tigers . That brand to remain . Any other is a new identity entirely .
Click to expand...
Your just playing with words.

Hypothetical - the new Wests Magpies continue to play home games at Campbelltown & Leichhardt. They have a token little Tiger on the sleeve. And nothing else changes beyond the emblem and the colours. Is that a “new identity entirely”? Sure it’s a hefty do over but it’s the same club simply running around with a fresh hue.

When Balmain changed the name of their club to Sydney back in the 90s and ditched Leichhardt - was that a new identity?

Change is always difficult - but people cope 🤷‍♂️
 
I want NRL to step in but seriously wtf are they gonna do?

HBG will bend over for a year or two and say yes we will implement these changes and then go about their own ways after 2 years.

It's a never ending cycle.

What is their motivation? Seriously what is it that you actually want to do? HBG is not a person, they've had different board members, chairperson etc and all have been one shit show after another.

Their organization structure is unfit to run an NRL club. Idk if its incompetence, selfishness, ulterior motives, greed etc.. whatever it is, how much more proof do you need that they are unfit.

Put the license up for a bid and black list any company that has any affiliation with HBG or it's former board members.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 672 (members: 4, guests: 668)
Back
Top