Laughable...sounds like silly old mate here
Blazers and debentures is their only care
HBG, Independent Directors Sacked
- Thread starter BlackWhiteGold
- Start date
Laughable...sounds like silly old mate here
Blazers and debentures is their only care
hank37w
Well-known member
Because they Viola-ted his rights.
hank37w
Well-known member
You might have trouble finding a direct public quote because it doesn't exist.
I think everything will start to die down from here....therell be some media about the rally over the weekend/ early next week....if anything comes from that its gotta be asic and or L&G.
That would take a while imo but im not confide t now either of thise entities will change anything.
Denis hiding in the corner as per will see him untouched and unscathed as usual....i think the.pots boiled over and the heats off now...itll die down and.the players have 2.months to prepare
Hopefully theyre left alone to focus on what they need to do...hopefully Bula is sorted shortly too
Correct
Masters
Private ownership the way to go
This is what PVL said yesterday.
Full article posted by @BlackWhiteGold on page 307 and 308
Post #6142
V’landys said he had to intervene to protect the NRL and Wests Tigers brands.
“A licence is a privilege, a licence to be in the NRL is worth a lot of money,” V’landys said on Thursday. “Naturally, we have our rights under the licence, and we will use those rights if we have to.
“In this case, we didn’t have to because they were professional enough to reach an amicable solution. We appreciate their professionalism in that regard. They gave us an undertaking they won’t dilute the Balmain brand, they are putting the independents back on with Barry as chair.
“It’s the best solution to give the fans confidence before Christmas. And, more importantly, for Benji Marshall and the team. We won’t allow any dilution. If they ever try, it won’t happen. Balmain fans can rest easy it will never happen.”
V’landys felt the reinstatement of the independent directors, particularly O’Farrell, would provide
the club with much-needed stability.
my bad, i apologize for being a smart rc ,i jumped the gun.
Eye opening for some , just old news for others
liltiger
Well-known member
Masters really asking the tough questions that need answering. More like playing cover for mates. Absolute joke.
mikey
Well-known member
He needs to go but; just like nutgrass, only pulling the head off doesn't help - you got to get all the nuts out.
hybrid_tiger
Well-known member
Do you expect anything less?
Any article by Roy Masters is written and authorised by HBG.
liltiger
Well-known member
It's all about Richo being autonomous and not asking permission. Because HBG know what they're doing, not the bloke that's lifted 2 clubs off the canvas to win comps.
Tito Santana
Well-known member
Tito recommends.
weststigers
Well-known member
In isolation, it's a good policy and could be a sign we have a CEO that can read a room. Getting a template back to an email written in frustration is beyond annoying, so well done there I guess.
Practically speaking, it's like complaining to your siblings about your parents. You might get some sympathy, but it won't change the result.
426Tlgerland
Well-known member
It’s the leaks that prove a point , under Richo it was silence , once a strong leader is removed all the grubs start coming out with there stories , lies , pot stirring , they can’t help the self’s , HBG has not got one person who would or could do a good job with the football department , Burgess and co must go , and I mean the whole debenture set up removed for a members of football club voting system , no one says Burgess and co can’t run for spots but yes the first time it may be messy with 50 candidates but so what it will get better over time , the current system Is flawed
weststigers
Well-known member
If we take a step back, it is very strange a bunch of people, who were publicly and unceremoniously dismissed and had their character smeared on the way out, would return 10 days later.
The devil is in the detail.
My guess is this.
V'Landys didn't want to create a media storm by appointing an administrator. He made the agreement that O'Farrell and the other independents would be reporting directly to the NRL as a watchdog of sorts. This gave the independents enough confidence to return and gave HBG what they ultimately wanted which is board control.
I believe that, the NRL believes, it's a good solution, but it's not going to stop bad decisions being made.
Time will show their incompetence.
Tom Shines
Well-known member
Do you think the three Independent Directors …just reinstated after a firestorm that had the potential to do damage to their careers …. Have decided to go back for potentially more of the same ? I don’t see why they would bother to be someone else’s sock puppet….who cares who they report to if they are outvoted every time … There has to be more to the story ..
diedpretty
Well-known member
More aligned to Melbourne than Wests these days - personally i though the article was more about an explanation of how we are where we are now for those who don't spend their life on football forums ramming their agendas down everyones throats.
Harvey
Well-known member
Short memories.
Wests Macarthur pulled out of the joint venture because Balmain & Wests Ashfield were voting as a block to ensure operations were focused on the inner west.
This same recognition of a Leichhardt history has got the CEO sacked.
Focus on the south west? Have had 25 years to do that and the first to try and build those connections was Richo.
Wests Ashfield screwed that up when they ran the Magpies for 10+ years before the merger. Absolutely hilarious to try and hear them now use that community as the basis for recent decisions
