Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

gregjm87 said:
I agree with you in theory. But I don't see what is to be gained if we were given all the salaries.

All that would happen is fans would see players not playing to their price tag and blame them for losses. This happens already. Or underpaid players would see what the teammates or opponents earn and demand pay rises. Again, this happens already. Finally, we would look at the Broncos having almost a $million more TPAs than everyone else and say that's why their successful and were not. Guess what, this happens already.
Click to expand...

We would know what money is available still to be spent for each team …should that be a state secret ? I find watching US sports that being privy to the goings on with things like roster building further enhances the fan experience… the NRL also needs a free agent window as well on that point..

Also would be good to see how the Broncos, Roosters and others can have a much superior squad whilst we also spend the same amount of money …the TPA’s ‘s should be made public …if it doesn’t change anything …at least it’s out in the open and we can all see what a farce it imight lead to it being questioned. otherwise it just continues on for decades… you know the old saying - sunlight is the best disinfectant

The players that are being ripped off should know if as well…..although I think this isn’t as wide spread as you think I suspect …the agents are all talking to each other and they know the worth of their players
 
Last edited:
gregjm87 said:
I agree with you in theory. But I don't see what is to be gained if we were given all the salaries.

All that would happen is fans would see players not playing to their price tag and blame them for losses. This happens already. Or underpaid players would see what the teammates or opponents earn and demand pay rises. Again, this happens already. Finally, we would look at the Broncos having almost a $million more TPAs than everyone else and say that's why their successful and were not. Guess what, this happens already.
Click to expand...

I agree. I have no interest on knowing the exact salaries of players because for me, all it does is tell me what is on the books, not whats getting into the bank account or their wives,or other ways of propping the contract up. Sceptical yes, I know am, but having salaries published achieves nothing IMO
 
Last edited:
king_sirro said:
I agree. I have no interest on knowing the exact salaries of players because for me, all it does is tell me what is on the books, not whats getting into the bank account or there wives,or other ways of propping the contract up. Sceptical yes, I know am, but having salaries published achieves nothing IM
Click to expand...

Plus all the poor players getting criticised for not living up to expectations … it’s not like that ever happens now ..
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
nz need a centre, would be a.great trade for barnett
Click to expand...
Look I don't want to do this unless someone good is coming our way.

Skelton for Barnett is a good trade.
Yet our backline will suddenly look pretty poor:
Turuva
May
Makasini
?? Laulili (who are off to Perth).

Makasini has performed in the trails, but we should be planning an easing into first grade.
Sure I would swap Skelton for Barnett, but we go from a balanced team to a team really missing a back.

I hate that we have the bye round 1 again 🙁
 
crazycat said:
Look I don't want to do this unless someone good is coming our way.

Skelton for Barnett is a good trade.
Yet our backline will suddenly look pretty poor:
Turuva
May
Makasini
?? Laulili (who are off to Perth).

Makasini has performed in the trails, but we should be planning an easing into first grade.
Sure I would swap Skelton for Barnett, but we go from a balanced team to a team really missing a back.

I hate that we have the bye round 1 again 🙁
Click to expand...
This isn't slavery "Skelton for Barnett is a good trade." you can't trade people. If they don't want to go or don't want to play @WTs nothing will happen.
 
Tom Shines said:
We would know what money is available still to be spent for each team …should that be a state secret ? I find watching US sports that being privy to the goings on with things like roster building further enhances the fan experience… the NRL also needs a free agent window as well..

Also would be good to see how the Broncos, Roosters and others can have a much superior squad whilst we also spend the same amount of money …the TPA’s ‘s should be made public …if it doesn’t change anything …at least it’s out in the open and we can all see what a farce it is and something might be done to change things …otherwise it just continues on for decades… you know the old saying - sunlight is the best disinfectant

The players that are being ripped off should know if as well…..although I think this isn’t as wide spread as you think I suspect …the agents are all talking to each other and they know the worth of their players
Click to expand...
Good answer. I like the first paragraph. I think most fans would like knowing cap space remaining at each club, though I do see an argument against also. E.g. Losing fan engagement once cap is essentially full or clubs have less negotiating power if agents know exactly how much is remaining. But these are more just highlighting the other perspective rather than actual personal concerns.

I still wouldn't expect anything to change with TPAs. It would be very easily argued as a restraint to attempt to limit them. I actually believe the best thing if it was revealed is it wouldn't be anywhere near as much of a farce as people think (for the most part). Again less of a concern but I see an argument that players may actively seek to get to clubs like the Broncos if it is in black and white that there is a far greater earning capacity there. It potentially (not necessarily likely but potentially) create a bigger gap.

I don't think that players being on unders is widespread. It would often happen for a season but then of course in most cases the pressure to upgrade and extend is put on by agents and even fans, I do think there are plenty of players on unders but very few with a massive discrepancy.
 
Tom Shines said:
I’m no expert, but don’t they do player trades in the AFL? Do we need to alert the UN Human Rights Commission?
Click to expand...
The player still needs to opt to leave in AFL. Most common example a player in say Adelaide asks to return to Melbourne. They won't necessarily choose the club but they do have some say in the club and complete say in destination.
 
Tom Shines said:
I’m no expert, but don’t they do player trades in the AFL? Do we need to alert the UN Human Rights Commission?
Click to expand...
Only with the consent of the players involved - plenty of clubs ( Essendon, GWS, Suns etc) refused trades for players last year and required the player to honour the contract - players have the right to say no and the club is required to honour the contract. It's done with everyone's knowledge and agreement. The UNHCR would be a welcome input.
 
gregjm87 said:
Good answer. I like the first paragraph. I think most fans would like knowing cap space remaining at each club, though I do see an argument against also. E.g. Losing fan engagement once cap is essentially full or clubs have less negotiating power if agents know exactly how much is remaining. But these are more just highlighting the other perspective rather than actual personal concerns.

I still wouldn't expect anything to change with TPAs. It would be very easily argued as a restraint to attempt to limit them. I actually believe the best thing if it was revealed is it wouldn't be anywhere near as much of a farce as people think (for the most part). Again less of a concern but I see an argument that players may actively seek to get to clubs like the Broncos if it is in black and white that there is a far greater earning capacity there. It potentially (not necessarily likely but potentially) create a bigger gap.

I don't think that players being on unders is widespread. It would often happen for a season but then of course in most cases the pressure to upgrade and extend is put on by agents and even fans, I do think there are plenty of players on unders but very few with a massive discrepancy.
Click to expand...

Cheers …I’ll leave it at that …. I agree with some of things you say … and I don’t think anything is changing anytime soon…
 
Tom Shines said:
I’m no expert, but don’t they do player trades in the AFL? Do we need to alert the UN Human Rights Commission?
Click to expand...
You are correct re the trade in AFL but the player has to agree to be traded.There is a story of a player locking up his house so the club officials couldn’t get in and pressure to agree.
 
Nonotmeagain said:
Only with the consent of the players involved - plenty of clubs ( Essendon, GWS, Suns etc) refused trades for players last year and required the player to honour the contract - players have the right to say no and the club is required to honour the contract. It's done with everyone's knowledge and agreement. The UNHCR would be a welcome input.
Click to expand...

Ok ..cheers I wasn’t aware of that about the AFL players
 
king_sirro said:
I agree. I have no interest on knowing the exact salaries of players because for me, all it does is tell me what is on the books, not whats getting into the bank account or their wives,or other ways of propping the contract up. Sceptical yes, I know am, but having salaries published achieves nothing IMO
Click to expand...
Yep. Publishing salaries won't stop any genuine rorts, so ultimately I think nothing changes. Tom however did make some fair points to other benefits.
 
Tom Shines said:
We would know what money is available still to be spent for each team …should that be a state secret ? I find watching US sports that being privy to the goings on with things like roster building further enhances the fan experience… the NRL also needs a free agent window as well on that point..

Also would be good to see how the Broncos, Roosters and others can have a much superior squad whilst we also spend the same amount of money …the TPA’s ‘s should be made public …if it doesn’t change anything …at least it’s out in the open and we can all see what a farce it imight lead to it being questioned. otherwise it just continues on for decades… you know the old saying - sunlight is the best disinfectant

The players that are being ripped off should know if as well…..although I think this isn’t as wide spread as you think I suspect …the agents are all talking to each other and they know the worth of their players
Click to expand...
I started writing practically the same view, but gave up, so thanks @Tom Shines!

Why is sport different to any other form of entertainment? No one ever seems to feel it's an invasion of privacy knowing how much Brad Pitt got paid for his last movie...

I also agree knowing a team's cap does add a lot! When an NFL player signs with a team for X years on $Y per year, everyone then knows if CBD how he fits in the cap, and if not, who will be traded?

We all know Dylan Brown signed with the Knights for $13M, 10 years. What no one is currently able to say definitively is how they are able to do this.

Who do you think will become available? Do they have a 6 or 7 the tigers should get now?

Yes, these are all already hypothesised about; but actually knowing the roster management really opens up what is currently a pretty foggy system that is outdated imo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 1,048 (members: 24, guests: 1,024)
Back
Top