Search results

It’s quite simple really. All Australians, and I mean all, not just indigenous, want the gap closed and everyone’s lot in life improved. But not by changing the constitution to single out one particular race. What an absolute waste of time and money and cause of division to enshrine a body that...

… “The whole point is to have people answerable to the Aboriginal population and not Canberra…” game set match….No.

Canelo way too good for loudmouth Charlo - Kudos for going up two weight divisions but still think Tszyu will handle Charlo v easily.

I know millions of words have been written for both sides but I thought this was interesting…. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/if-the-voice-referendum-fails-racism-won-t-be-to-blame-20230927-p5e81u.html?btis

As I have said before, in my humble opinion, the constitution of a country is written and preserved for all of its citizens - it should not be divisive in any way by, for example, singling out any one group of people..no matter who they are. Where there were originally statements of "division"...

the guy can play. As with all young kids - does he have enough in the tank to improve to be a top line NRL centre?

I think the line of thinking here is that if something as "potentially" benign as the Voice doesn't get up there is no way a treaty/Blak Sovereignty etc etc will ever be legislated, let alone enshrined in constitution.

and doesn't need to be enshrined in the constitution to work..

People need to think more about the statement of some people that the voice (as proposed) is going to improve the lot of the indigenous peoples and it seems the "right" thing to do. That is way too simplistic a view and this referendum is not a simple situation. It is too important and the...

It's all a bit divisive and unnecessary. The current constitution states ....( republic vs constitutional monarchy another issue altogether...) "It shall be lawful for the Queen, with the advice of the Privy Council, to declare by proclamation that, on and after a day therein appointed, not...

Literally impossible to keep everyone. More DT shite kicking the WT.

Not divisive at all, hey.

I’m probably late to the party, but we aren’t re-signing Seyfarth and he is going to the dogs??

I’ll just leave this here…..

Poorly presented and argued, as usual, by Albanese and Labor. I could live with a wording change recognising Aboriginal people. Terra Nullius has already been overturned by the High Court re Mabo but there is too much uncertainty around the Voice, and where its proponents want it to lead. Once...

Nah, if he became a board member of an NRL club he would be a rorter for sure.

Only WT's can be that stupid.... seriously, last straw (almost....:cry:)

the great Billy Thorpe

Leave that to the other masochists….. got better things to do.

Weak as….