Search results

good speed, doesn't shy from the tough stuff, good under the high ball..... defence?? always an issue with the rugby types....

Off the block incinerator- split my head on one of those back in the day- (5 stitches) - took the catch though lol

yep - would never get screened now..

Not big on country usually but just came back from the US - Nashville, and this was playing a lot - kinda like it.

As a source with knowledge of the situation, not authorised to speak publicly about the matter, RL journalists suck. Take no notice.

so this all it takes...pop around for a beer.... yep sure

World Test Champions, retained Ashes, ODI champs - how good. Seriously, as much as I love beating the poms, I love sticking it up the Indians on home soil, arrogant so and so's imho

I thought Jenny's number was 8675 309......

Smell me fingers‘ a myth.

My uncle who was in high school at Coogee in the 50's says there was a teacher there that used to do this - except he used to use a Dunlop Volley..... uncle says he was hit so many times he blames it for having lost his hair prematurely....:ROFLMAO:

It’s quite simple really. All Australians, and I mean all, not just indigenous, want the gap closed and everyone’s lot in life improved. But not by changing the constitution to single out one particular race. What an absolute waste of time and money and cause of division to enshrine a body that...

… “The whole point is to have people answerable to the Aboriginal population and not Canberra…” game set match….No.

Canelo way too good for loudmouth Charlo - Kudos for going up two weight divisions but still think Tszyu will handle Charlo v easily.

I know millions of words have been written for both sides but I thought this was interesting…. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/if-the-voice-referendum-fails-racism-won-t-be-to-blame-20230927-p5e81u.html?btis

As I have said before, in my humble opinion, the constitution of a country is written and preserved for all of its citizens - it should not be divisive in any way by, for example, singling out any one group of people..no matter who they are. Where there were originally statements of "division"...

the guy can play. As with all young kids - does he have enough in the tank to improve to be a top line NRL centre?

I think the line of thinking here is that if something as "potentially" benign as the Voice doesn't get up there is no way a treaty/Blak Sovereignty etc etc will ever be legislated, let alone enshrined in constitution.

and doesn't need to be enshrined in the constitution to work..

People need to think more about the statement of some people that the voice (as proposed) is going to improve the lot of the indigenous peoples and it seems the "right" thing to do. That is way too simplistic a view and this referendum is not a simple situation. It is too important and the...

It's all a bit divisive and unnecessary. The current constitution states ....( republic vs constitutional monarchy another issue altogether...) "It shall be lawful for the Queen, with the advice of the Privy Council, to declare by proclamation that, on and after a day therein appointed, not...