Search results

Easy matey, Seen your posts talking about re inventing the Wests tigers minus the inner west and just with Macauthur. That is a new identity again.

Actually here is 1, a moderator guy. Post in thread 'CEO - Shane Richardson' https://weststigersforum.com/threads/ceo-shane-richardson.35365/post-2208071 And, there are many others.

Gee I'm popular lol. Sorry I'm not savvy with features here.

Sorry there are many posts directly and indirectly referencing the exclusion of Wests and denigrading their legacy so you have missed that. Seems allowed on this forum. It would be too much work to quote them all.

I saw plenty of people with Balmain supporter clothing.

Weird.

Probably 500 people or so. Crowd was really well behaved,

Yes Magpies stuff at the rally would also be divisive. And that 3x board member and Barnier, I mean who knows what ther political motives are.

Not so sure about this reading on here.

There was alot of Balmain paraphernalia there, glad my 88 yo grandfather who played at Pratten Park didn't want to come, he thought it was developing into an anti Wests thing. I think in the context of a Wests Tigers unite movement Balmain paraphernalia is divisive yes. I'm sure some of those...

I noticed that. Have become quite addicted to this discussion so I've read most of the pages on this topic and I've noticed it's dominated by that WestsTigers guy. Also noticed abuse at not only alternative views but nuanced ones.

You seem very active on these topics I noticed lol, probably 100s of posts on the topic. Anyway, I haven't noticed anyone diminishing Balmain's brand through the tigers or their history on here really, which is the way it should be. But I have noticed Wests Magpies history denigrated and as I...

I'd be willing to sign up providing the Wests brand is protected and it's link to the inner west and Magpies history are preserved.

Gee, that's way too strong but sadly I do notice an attempt by many on this forum to diminish the Wests brand within the Wests Tigers which is sad. Seems to be encouraged really.

I ended up going on my own and thought there was about 500 people. Thought it was a bit divisive though, alot of Balmain paraphernalia and was disappointed Barnier who led the review spoke and noticed former sacked board members there so one wonders what their agendas were. Would've preferred...

Is this about ego or agenda?

See this exactly what I mean, even someone supportive but not totally behind a narrative gets abused, I see it throughout the pages. Addictive forum though. But somehow it appears in your messaging you are pleading a weak case with your abuse.

Never knew I had to subscribe totally to a certain viewpoint. Is this a forum prerequisite? I must admit the forum is addictive and I've spent a little time going through the threads. However, it seems they are dominated by just a few users who seem to browbeat everyone who doesn't adhere to a...

How many people do you think would do this though?

Given the NRL addressing the situation the rally just seems divisive now. The more time I spend on here, and yes, it is addictive I'm starting to think this is just a small scale movement. Threads seems dominated by a handful of users. It's looking like there may only be 100 or so people at...