HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

BZN said:
How low are you willing to go to get what Wests Ashfield/Wests Magpies have and you won't accept as fact.
I appreciate atpit you are only being sarcastic, but the fact you would even think like this says a lot.
In fact, it's about the same level as Cochise's thread he titled "I hate Magpies", and at the time he said he was being sarcastic also.
But was he really?
Click to expand...
You sir are an idiot.
 
mtd#2 said:
When you refer to the Wests magpies brand, what are you referring to?

The club's name is "Wests Tigers". Wests got the location part of the brand. Tigers got the mascot.

So "Wests" is the first word in the name of the club and I haven't seen anyone suggest we get rid of that. Have I missed something?

The reality is, Balmain is dead as is the Magpie. They were the sacrifices made when forming the joint venture

So I guess back to the original question, what exactly are you suggesting people are trying to kill off form Wests Magpies, other than the self serving owners - who never put the football club first? Furthermore, who is encouraging it?
Click to expand...

Sorry there are many posts directly and indirectly referencing the exclusion of Wests and denigrading their legacy so you have missed that.

Seems allowed on this forum.

It would be too much work to quote them all.
 
Last edited:
BZN said:
How low are you willing to go to get what Wests Ashfield/Wests Magpies have and you won't accept as fact.
I appreciate atpit you are only being sarcastic, but the fact you would even think like this says a lot.
In fact, it's about the same level as Cochise's thread he titled "I hate Magpies", and at the time he said he was being sarcastic also.
But was he really?
Click to expand...
What is "atpit" please?
 
innsaneink said:
Yeah yeah I know....but we had people that give a damn enough come from perth, Tassie, four hours away in Canowindra
It just proves they dont care about OUR team
Click to expand...
I agree for sure.

They were quick to get their mugs on TV when they destroyed a functioning board, but nothing since.
 
LiverpoolTiger said:
Sorry there are many posts directly and indirectly referencing and exclusion of Wests and denigrading theor legacy so you have missed that.

Seems allowed on this forum.

It would be to much work to quote them all.
Click to expand...
I've probably been one of the more active members during the last week and I haven't seen anyone suggest we get rid of the Wests magpies part of the venture (the football club, the junior catchment etc).. everyone just wants HBG out.

You are spinning the same narrative as others on here suggesting there's a plot against the Wests Magpies side of the venture, yet the HBG are the ones who are pushing for the division...

Unless you can be more specific as to what's being suggested and how exactly we are trying to dismantle the Wests side of the venture, then you're talking out your backside
 
weststigers said:
Was that meant to be an insult? lol

Anyway, I haven't seen anyone do what you accuse, yet you still say it. Diminished and denigrated are quite vague terms.

I'm sure you can't articulate what exactly you mean by that when you say what you say. God knows people have tried to get an answer but it's always followed by silence.

With 90% ownership, you'd think there would be no diminishment? Most struggle to see what on earth the problem is.
Click to expand...
🙁 How on earth did you decide that denigrate was a vague term>>criticise unfairly, belittle, run down, unjust, dismissive or disrespectful.
 
BZN said:
That seems like a pretty intelligent thing to do.
To be able to front the hostile herd and give Wests side of the story which may have the effect of calming the "frothing masses".
If the organisers of the rally didn't invite them, they're pretty slack and to me shows all the organisers are interested in is being a frothing masmas
Click to expand...
Paton was offered a chance to be on our podcast.
 
innsaneink said:
ALL Wests Tigers supporters were invited, not personally but in the week an a bit leading up to it via the socials
The fact the majority shareholders didnt attend to allay WTs supporters fears....is telling.
Supporters came from all over the country yet HBG couldnt manage the 15 minute walk from WA to PP
Click to expand...
Great comment Ink. Their was no divisive talk today it was about demanding better for WTs. If you are still more interested in measuring what side is represented more in who turned up you are missing the point.
 
Last edited:
BZN said:
🙁 How on earth did you decide that denigrate was a vague term>>criticise unfairly, belittle, run down, unjust, dismissive or disrespectful.
Click to expand...
It's only vague when you don't explain what specifically denigrates the Magpies. Still waiting for that...
 
weststigers said:
It's only vague when you don't explain what specifically denigrates the Magpies. Still waiting for that...
Click to expand...
Its been a week without answers from any of them.

They must fear HBG losing their share and it passing to an independent owner who doesn't have the interests of the west magpies at heart - but the interest of the Wests tigers.

There in lies the problem - they should be supportive of this... We are a joint venture.. but they only have their self serving interests at heart.. and want control... Mu h like hbg
 
mtd#2 said:
I've probably been one of the more active members during the last week and I haven't seen anyone suggest we get rid of the Wests magpies part of the venture (the football club, the junior catchment etc).. everyone just wants HBG out.

You are spinning the same narrative as others on here suggesting there's a plot against the Wests Magpies side of the venture, yet the HBG are the ones who are pushing for the division...

Unless you can be more specific as to what's being suggested and how exactly we are trying to dismantle the Wests side of the venture, then you're talking out your backside
Click to expand...
Sorry dude, but YOU are the one that's spinning the narrative as HBG and WESTS MAGPIES are 2 parts of one whole.
You try to turn things around by saying 'it's not the MAGPIES we want gone, it's HBG,>>> b/s.
It's a sneaky tactic of wanting to get rid of the Magpies by using dishonest terminology.
 
mtd#2 said:
I've probably been one of the more active members during the last week and I haven't seen anyone suggest we get rid of the Wests magpies part of the venture (the football club, the junior catchment etc).. everyone just wants HBG out.

You are spinning the same narrative as others on here suggesting there's a plot against the Wests Magpies side of the venture, yet the HBG are the ones who are pushing for the division...

Unless you can be more specific as to what's being suggested and how exactly we are trying to dismantle the Wests side of the venture, then you're talking out your backside
Click to expand...

Easy matey,

Seen your posts talking about re inventing the Wests tigers minus the inner west and just with Macauthur.

That is a new identity again.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BZN
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 4,058 (members: 19, guests: 4,039)
Back
Top