Search results

You are right players don't make decisions to sign because the board was nice to them. They do make decisions not to sign with dysfunctional rabbles though. Or they may put clauses in allowing them to leave. So no players aren't saying they signed because the owners were nice to them. But...

How does it?

As I said at the time leess announced the Wests Tigers couldn't announce his exit until after round 1 as they want to include him in their top 30 for this season.

Yeah mate I wasn't promoting the new setup, just explaining it.

They can have a 9th member but I believe at this point it will be 8 with the chair getting the deciding vote.

That is correct

Im not sure, he can play from round 2 on the development contract so I doubt that are in a rush.

We save whatever Leeds is paying him.

This

Mate, I think we make the 8.

We save money as we don't pay him for the rest of the year.

We don't want to replace him in 2026.

I wouldn't think he could play. I was surprised when Leeds announced it a couple of weeks ago as I knew we were waiting until after round 1 to announce.

I have the names but don't know if I'm allowed to share them. They will show up on ASIC soon enough

Agree with all that mate.

Birds release hasn't been announced because if we do announce it after round 1 he can be included in our top 30 for 2026 and we don't need to replace him.

So when they only remove the independent directors but leave the ownership representatives, would that not point the finger?

8 directors have been appointed. They are not announcing the appointments at this point.

So you are ok with them damaging the professional reputation of the independent directors by stating they were removed for a lack of communication?

They won't even announce the new Wests tigers Board.