HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
dont want 2b an itch about it but the theory was if we don;t announce it ,the transfer didn't exist and somehow we could manipulate the transfer if when/we chose. It may still be that way somehow ?
Part of the reason league is unenjoyable now days ,The rule book is rewritten every year with clauses thrown in mid year for the last 6 years and then get twisted depending on the backlash or what time of year it is and if your in the chosen team to benefit from it ,Rant over That's my whinge for the day - tune in tomorrow for another,lol
 
Maybe the directors who clearly prize their abilities(despite being the largest anchor for our team)shlds stop stressing about the size of the bird logo on the sleeve,and start thinking about crearive ways of getting Lomax across for a cple of years like Storm attempted
Wldnt have crossed their minds Ii suspect
 
Maybe the directors who clearly prize their abilities(despite being the largest anchor for our team)shlds stop stressing about the size of the bird logo on the sleeve,and start thinking about crearive ways of getting Lomax across for a cple of years like Storm attempted
Wldnt have crossed their minds Ii suspect
There fairly competent in forking out the cash for ideas that don't come to fruitation.
You underestimate their incompetence
 
Maybe the directors who clearly prize their abilities(despite being the largest anchor for our team)shlds stop stressing about the size of the bird logo on the sleeve,and start thinking about crearive ways of getting Lomax across for a cple of years like Storm attempted
Wldnt have crossed their minds Ii suspect
Just a bit of trivia.
The magpies bigger than the tiger on some items
 
Agree on the financial, but it's horrible press man. So dumb.

Players lose respect for their leaders, then they'll start to show none also.

It impacts WT. 100%
I appreciate your stance.

I disagree- I don't think the players really care for board members of the financial backing of any club- unless it results with more in their pocket.

I'm yet to hear any player say "I signed on because the guys paying the wages were really nice to me".

Actually- no. I've heard some players praise Nick Politis. So there might be occasions.

But I think players sign, or don't sign, mostly due to the coach & the players around them. Respecting old guys that get voted onto a board would, in general, have very little impact on the team.
 
However, I'm sure that it would be a red flag for many players to go to a club that is constantly in the media for all the wrong reasons.

Dare I say it but we may actually be a club that falls into that category and then you are relying completely on the drawing power of the coach, some of the players that are already there and of course getting paid overs to go there.
 
I appreciate your stance.

I disagree- I don't think the players really care for board members of the financial backing of any club- unless it results with more in their pocket.

I'm yet to hear any player say "I signed on because the guys paying the wages were really nice to me".

Actually- no. I've heard some players praise Nick Politis. So there might be occasions.

But I think players sign, or don't sign, mostly due to the coach & the players around them. Respecting old guys that get voted onto a board would, in general, have very little impact on the team.
I’m an elite athlete.

I’ve had to deal with incompetent club and association boards and have even joined my own club one to get them headed back in the right direction and have found a minor position within the association for something else. The problem is they are ALL over the age of 50 and predominantly 70+.

A large portion of them don’t adequately adapt to the ever changing nature of the sport and make poor decisions in organisation of events, teams and direction.

It hasn’t necessarily affected my performance within the sport in a way I can quantify it, but it has caused me a lot of unnecessary stress, energy and time which has heavily impacted other areas of my life.

I personally am able to block these things out when I compete and train but for an NRL Squad of 36 players, it’s ludicrous to think none of them will be affected by what’s going on. It’s also particularly harmful to signing/retention because players are unsure of the clubs stability, managers are unsure of the clubs stability so if someone else with a solid administration offers a similar deal it’s hard to see why you’d pick us.
 
I’m an elite athlete.

I’ve had to deal with incompetent club and association boards and have even joined my own club one to get them headed back in the right direction and have found a minor position within the association for something else. The problem is they are ALL over the age of 50 and predominantly 70+.

A large portion of them don’t adequately adapt to the ever changing nature of the sport and make poor decisions in organisation of events, teams and direction.

It hasn’t necessarily affected my performance within the sport in a way I can quantify it, but it has caused me a lot of unnecessary stress, energy and time which has heavily impacted other areas of my life.

I personally am able to block these things out when I compete and train but for an NRL Squad of 36 players, it’s ludicrous to think none of them will be affected by what’s going on. It’s also particularly harmful to signing/retention because players are unsure of the clubs stability, managers are unsure of the clubs stability so if someone else with a solid administration offers a similar deal it’s hard to see why you’d pick us.
Best post I've seen in ages.
And if Benji fails where to from there - given that's where they have thrown keys. Players will only stay loyal for so long before they put their careers first.
We are back at square one rebuild against increased competition with no credibility given our years of failure.
 
I appreciate your stance.

I disagree- I don't think the players really care for board members of the financial backing of any club- unless it results with more in their pocket.

I'm yet to hear any player say "I signed on because the guys paying the wages were really nice to me".

Actually- no. I've heard some players praise Nick Politis. So there might be occasions.

But I think players sign, or don't sign, mostly due to the coach & the players around them. Respecting old guys that get voted onto a board would, in general, have very little impact on the team.
Why do you think luai has his clauses?

I also think the impact from the media picking these up makes us a laughing stock to players and agents.

A silent, non disruptive board is what you're referring to. One that is almost invisible and gets the job done. We are not lucky enough to have that...
 
If it’s an 8 person board, I’ll have a stab it’s this …

Chair Barry O’Farrell
HBG chief executive Daniel Paton
HBG deputy chairman Frank Primerano
HBG board member Mick Liubinskas
HBG chief commercial officer Michelle Nielsen
Independent Michelle McDowell
Balmain Danny Stapleton
WM Leo Epifania

Basing it earlier media reports like this one


and who was in the group photo published yesterday (i.e. no Annabell Williams).
Danny Stapelton’s still there ... well that’s a huge relief 🤟
 
I appreciate your stance.

I disagree- I don't think the players really care for board members of the financial backing of any club- unless it results with more in their pocket.

I'm yet to hear any player say "I signed on because the guys paying the wages were really nice to me".

Actually- no. I've heard some players praise Nick Politis. So there might be occasions.

But I think players sign, or don't sign, mostly due to the coach & the players around them. Respecting old guys that get voted onto a board would, in general, have very little impact on the team.
You are right players don't make decisions to sign because the board was nice to them.

They do make decisions not to sign with dysfunctional rabbles though. Or they may put clauses in allowing them to leave.

So no players aren't saying they signed because the owners were nice to them. But players avoid clubs that continuously show they are incompetent.
 
Why do you think luai has his clauses?

I also think the impact from the media picking these up makes us a laughing stock to players and agents.

A silent, non disruptive board is what you're referring to. One that is almost invisible and gets the job done. We are not lucky enough to have that...
Not to mention HB directors having a crack at WTs fans on social media...using more divisive terminology
Hi Allan
 
Why do you think luai has his clauses?

I also think the impact from the media picking these up makes us a laughing stock to players and agents.

A silent, non disruptive board is what you're referring to. One that is almost invisible and gets the job done. We are not lucky enough to have that...
Do players at other club's ever have clauses in their contracts ?

Asking for a friend 😎
 

Members online

Back
Top