Search results

Actually this place is a real joke so I'm closing my account

Don't know what your talking about there? Obviously something that doesn't suit your narrative. For a guy who talks like he knows all the answers that's a soft response. Seems nobody likes to answer tough questions on here which don't suit them, they only like asking questions. And you know...

Yeah probably why you laugh at my responses. Blind Freddy can see people like you try to control the narrative and discourage alternative views. That's why this forum is a bit suspicious really.

And by the way, I notice your moderators and others pushing for dropping the name Wests are still here and not called out. Is this the official policy of this forum, because obviously there is alot of bias here? Not really any different of people calling for the dropping of Tigers.

Not all and really HBG gets a better deal. I think Vlandys knows stuff we don't know and my guy, well initially my guy Shane was really the target.

Not exactly clear that the haste with which to stand down the independants meant Wests Ashfield intended to move away from the independant model. Vlandys arbitration of the matter siding with Wests Ashfield might mean more will come to light re why in coming days. Certainly Vlandys decision...

Last post, So HBG are bringing back the magpies but worried about the amalgamation agreement. Yeah right.

Why would they brand it Wests Tigers if they are bringing back the magpies though?

That's the intention, and I think Flemington is profitable but they are many millions and years from breaking even I'm told. I knew I shouldn't have gotten into this forum lol. Need to stop .

He shouldn't be taking a position since he led a non binding review.

It will be called Wests Tigers I believe. For an entity planning a return of the magpies its certainly a funny approach that doesn't add up. Vlandys knows.

Nearly 17 million I'm told has being spent on Balmain up to now and they will take on alot of risk and expense here I'm told. Imagine if Balmain was financial all this money could go towards the Tigers.

Obviously Vlandys' has made his decision. Sounds like everyone has accepted it.

According to HBG governance wasn't followed by Shane and the board hence the breach. Any why did Barnier speak at the rally? I thought that was really odd.

That haste was senseless. They must have had cause though hence Vlandys basically ruling in their favour.

Vlandys obviously must be naive then.

Pop also mentioned that Wests Ashfield pumped 15 million to save Balmain and now a further multi million dollar investment to rebuild Rozelle hence why grants are smaller than could be. Their actions don't seem consistent of a party that wants to eliminate their partner.

You seem to make many assumptions. Apparently they were at all meetings and everything was unanimous so it is reasonable to deduce that Shane or a sub committee withheld information. Vlandys actions seem to show that they had cause but acted with unnecessary haste. Pop reckons off ramps...

We plebs will never know.

And it's funny I've heard a nonsensical idea about a return to the Wests Magpies by Wests Ashfield. But if this is so how come they are funding a multi million dollar development at Rozelle for a new Wests Tigers club? Doesn't add up. Vlandys ' would've considered all of this.