Search results

Sadly that is all true, there simply is no accountability in the media any more.

"Sources familiar with the situation talking on the condition of anonymity as they were not permitted to discuss the deal". Every time Chammas does this he loses credibility. Here he is accepting the word of a dishonest person who was not permitted to speak out but did so anyway. Either name...

He's 6'5", we need to sign whoever is bullying him.

This is where Benji gets his best ideas. (Hi Benji)

So much for the theory "whatever goes up must come down".

Ciraldo might be in for a surprise. Ciraldo: "Lachy, I want you to run straight lines and support your half" Galvin: "You do you and I'll do me"

I would settle for reliable and honest journalism. All of that goes out the window when gutless journalists like Chammas and Weilder put their names to contrived rubbish prefaced by "sources with knowledge of the situation talking on the condition of anonymity....", and then follow it up with...

Lucky bugger, I'd kill to be 78 again.

Well we're not Japanese, so that was a good start. Older doesn't make you wiser, but there are just too many entitled people running around today who don't appreciate what they have, and don't realise what might have been.

No, I'm personally responsible for absolutely everything including WW2. What are they going to do, give me life?

February 1944, the silent generation, so I don't talk about it much.

One scenario might be that Joe was a part payment for Moses who panicked and signed the same day (coincidence?), then we found an excuse to stall the Joe deal while we do a swap for someone else?

Everything went quiet on that one, but Mitch has the opportunity to set himself up for life and extend best buddy Luke for a few more years, so no downside for him that I can see. Could be plenty downside for the Tigers, but it could work too.

I Could the Joffa to Parra move be a sweetener towards getting Mitch? I'm not convinced that deal is dead in the water as Zero Tackle have him on a player option for 2024 rather than a contract, and we're not paying Fulton for doing nothing.

Apologies Cobarcats, I only now noticed your post.

Imagine the players who would walk away from their contracts if they became void due to illegal TPA's. Would Manu stay at the Roosters for his advertised $700K? I don't think so!

I don't pretend to understand contractual law but believe contracts to be void or unenforceable if they contain fraudulent elements. If both parties are content that they each benefit from the fraudulent elements nothing will change unless (unsure on this point) a third party objects. In this...

Reason being that "Shitty Sheens" was disrespectful.

Heard it from Hooper who heard it from someone who heard it from an associate of someone who was a Tiger. No names no pack drill.

Hooper has lost all credibility with his Munster story beginning with "the way we've heard it the Tigers are talking about". Some unnamed Tiger who can't talk to Munster before November 1st told someone who told Hooper? This reeks of cash for comments with Hooper passing on Anasta's rubbish to...