2014 top 25

![](http://staticnrl.sportalhosting.com/site/_content/image/00054008-image.jpg)

![](http://staticnrl.sportalhosting.com/site/_content/image/00054009-image.jpg)

![](http://staticnrl.sportalhosting.com/site/_content/image/00054010-image.jpg)

![](http://staticnrl.sportalhosting.com/site/_content/image/00054011-image.jpg)

im guessing

brown, gavet, vela, lovett, moses, luani, rowe and mr t would be the ones not in the top 25
 
Prmz I reckon you've got it almost exactly right

Only one I disagree with would be Moses

After all the problems we had trying to get Brooks a game in 2013 I would name Moses so if we aren't having the best season we can blood him for a few weeks late in the season
 
@happy tiger said:
Prmz I reckon you've got it almost exactly right

Only one I disagree with would be Moses

After all the problems we had trying to get Brooks a game in 2013 I would name Moses so if we aren't having the best season we can blood him for a few weeks late in the season

i think it depends on KPI how much he plays. he's signed for a very long time though 2017 or 18 IIRC.

also, arent the NRL fixing up the 2nd tier so that doesn't happen again? all they would need to do is allow players to be removed from our 'cap' as such for the remainder of the year if they are injured badly like Moltz. Obviously not to allow us to purchase more but just to let us play 1 or 2 extra players from lower grades.
 
The top 33 are all full time, the top 25 is simply the highest paid players for cap purposes, I'm led to believe that with alterations to the tier 2 cap it should make no difference if they are in the top 25.
I am skeptical, if it is that simple, it leaves it open to rorts.
 
avg. is around 42 games per player by my calculations

lose the 6 most experienced and the avg. becomes 7
that's why i think maybe farah, anasta, fulton, halatau, blair and galloway will be automatic inclusions in the team unless they perform absolutely horrible
 
@tig_prmz said:
avg. is around 42 games per player by my calculations

lose the 6 most experienced and the avg. becomes 7
that's why i think maybe farah, anasta, fulton, halatau, blair and galloway will be automatic inclusions in the team unless they perform absolutely horrible

Without working out the calculations I'm happy to say that your calculations are wrong in regards to the average of 7 games if you take away the top 6 experience players… Having a quick look at the numbers of games that players have played it is not possible.
I'd suggest you have probably taken away the amount of games that the top 6 players have played in your calculations but have forgotten to reduce the number of players from 33 to 27...
It's a Sunday night and I can't be bothered doing the correct sums for you sorry. Perhaps someone else is willing?

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
1402 total game- 33 players: 42 avg.

1168 (from memory) of top 6 players- around 8 is the avg.

except for the divisions did the adding up without using calculator so apologies in adv. if i did something wrong
 
What I love about all these youngsters is that after we give more time to blood them they will have all gained their NRL experience together as a team.

I expect to see some big things from Tedesco in particular. I have a feeling 2014 will be his break out year
 
@tig_prmz said:
1402 total game- 33 players: 42 avg.

1168 (from memory) of top 6 players- around 8 is the avg.

except for the divisions did the adding up without using calculator so apologies in adv. if i did something wrong

Yeah your stats are all out.. Have a bit of work to put off doing so just did the sums then!
According to the stats in the pics in the posts above we have
1984 NRL games experience - 33 players
Average is then 60 games
The top 6 most experience players = 1168 games
Subtract the top 6 players and the rest of the squad have 816 games experience - 27 players
816 divided by 27 gives us an average of 30 games experience per player (when we don't include the top 6)

If you have a look through the stats there is only about 7 players who have played less than 7 games, with players like woods and moltzen having played many more games that was the red flag that made me aware tig_prmz 's stats were out

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@happy tiger said:
Prmz I reckon you've got it almost exactly right

Only one I disagree with would be Moses

After all the problems we had trying to get Brooks a game in 2013 I would name Moses so if we aren't having the best season we can blood him for a few weeks late in the season

Totally agree happy tiger. Mitch Moses a must for top 25\. I think he will be class footballer.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top