3, 2, 1

@ said:
3 Matt Mcillrick
2 Noffo
1 Lawrence

I gave Lawrence the 1 point ahead of Moses because it was a much improved effort by him,good D and running lines better….
Moses did do well...then went missing when we needed him to step up and not make desperation plays at critical stages of the game....

Agree with this except statement on Moses. He was rubbish today. Perhaps tried too hard but didn't make a decent decision the entire second half.

Ava and Aloiai need more game time. Sue and Grant need less.

Shame Mckillwrick didn't get more game time, prob due to lack of bench
 
I think this is the first time Teddy has not been mentioned at all. Didn't think he was that bad & certainly looked dangerous every time he returned a kick. Positioning a little off though.

3\. Nofo
2\. ET
1\. Aloiai/Teddy
 
Nofo was our best today by a LONG way.

He took so many hit-ups coming out of our end and also made plenty of metres coming up the middle.
He created some spark and showed some energy especially when times got tough.
He was also very solid in defence.

Nofo for me is close to Tedesco in terms of re-signing priority.
 
3\. Nofoaluma
2\. Grant
1\. Lawrence

Honourable Mentions McIllwrick Woods Aloiai Seumanufagai Chee-Kam Tedesco Brooks

Naughty Cnr Sue and me for parking in the wrong spot..
 
3 - Nofo
2 - Woods
1 - Lawrence

Notable mentions to Suli, Aloiai and MCK.
 
Give the points to the fans , the players don't deserve anything

Wikipaedia have it right you know , we are amateurs

That defence around the ruck against a team that completed at barely 50% in the 1st half was a joke , disgraceful , the players need to apologize for that

Today for me was far more disappointing than the Canberra /Penrith games

We aren't smart , we lack everything it takes to make a semi decent football team
 
Can't agree with Grant, living on the ghost of running over Petro but couldn't punch his way out a paper bag.

3\. Nofo
2\. Lawrence
1\. Woods

Honourable mention to Aloiai and MCK.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top