707 Metres in Attack

[MacDougall]

Seriously. Just saw the stats on FSN. 707 metres in attack. What does that tell you? Nice one Sheens, let's have Flanagan and Meaney on the bench at the expense of Woods. This is the sort of stuff I thought Shifty had finally gotten out of his gameplan.

Be nice to have David Gower back now.

 

[TheDen]

They went sideways before they went forward so no surprise really. We missed Big Red massively tonight

 

[biggest_tigers_fan]

in was at the game and didnt see the play down our end for the whole second half

 

[Peaches]

We moved the Souths pack around. Did Sheens try to move the Titans around? The Titans seem a more mobile side so the lacking of a big man up front probably hurt us.

 

[stryker]

How many completed sets did we have?

 

[happy_tiger]

Seeing in average metres we were only 5 metres on average behind Titans per game 707 metres is bad I can't remember a side doing worse (No doubt someone has though)Seeing we averaged 1338 a game up until today .

 

[MacDougall]

How many completed sets did we have?

26/34 . 76%. A very good completion rate. NRLstats.com say we made 869m but that's still shocking.

 

[MacDougall]

Oh and no linebreaks in the whole game. First time I can seriously remember that happening.

 

[stryker]

How many completed sets did we have?

26/34 . 76%. A very good completion rate. NRLstats.com say we made 869m but that's still shocking.

That seems a lot of completions considering all the dropped ball.

 

[happy_tiger]

If you work it out about 35 metres per set not good .

 

[innsaneink]

Pathetic

 

[Bismark]

When you're kicking on 3rd tackle most of the time, you squander possession early and can't make as many metres.

The forwards were bad, the tactics were worse.

 

[VX225]

I think that's what cost us in the end, no go forward.

Let's home they make amends next week!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED