Tucker
Well-known member
The major stats that tell the story of the differences between all teams are as below:
Points scored: We scored 275 less points than the Roosters. Over 24 rounds that equals over 11 points / game.

Penalties against: We were the equal third worst team when it came to conceeding penalties. Our 144 is equal to 6 / game.

Possession %: The comp was reasonably even over 24 rounds with the highest (52% not much greater than the lowest (47%). We were just shy of even.

Set Completions: Again, our 79% was not far behind the leaders on 82%. We were mid table.

Linebreaks: This was a bad stat for us. We were miles off the pace.

All Run Meters: Again terrible. We were 6784m worse off than Penrith.

Kick Return Meters: Terrible. Need a vast improvement from our back 3.

Missed Tackles: Second worst in the comp. Far too high to compete without being able to re-group and cover.

Errors: These were bad but not as bad as I first thought.

All in all, our inability to be able to absorb the impacts of many of these elements led to our demise this year.
Points scored: We scored 275 less points than the Roosters. Over 24 rounds that equals over 11 points / game.

Penalties against: We were the equal third worst team when it came to conceeding penalties. Our 144 is equal to 6 / game.

Possession %: The comp was reasonably even over 24 rounds with the highest (52% not much greater than the lowest (47%). We were just shy of even.

Set Completions: Again, our 79% was not far behind the leaders on 82%. We were mid table.

Linebreaks: This was a bad stat for us. We were miles off the pace.

All Run Meters: Again terrible. We were 6784m worse off than Penrith.

Kick Return Meters: Terrible. Need a vast improvement from our back 3.

Missed Tackles: Second worst in the comp. Far too high to compete without being able to re-group and cover.

Errors: These were bad but not as bad as I first thought.

All in all, our inability to be able to absorb the impacts of many of these elements led to our demise this year.