Aaron Woods deserves

S

softlaw

Well-known member
his own thread.
Great performance. Did a lot of really hard, tough work.
Very very impressive for such a young prop.
 
Both he and BMM were out there as our props for about 15 minutes or so replacing Fifita.
The best part is they all did very well, offering different styles of "prop" which just keeps the defence guessing!

:smiley:
 
Woods was excellent again today, hard to split him and Galloway IMO on today's performance. BMM should start to show his impact in a few weeks hopefully.
 
Big call from Sheens playing BMM given his lack of match fitness. Only short minutes today but shows how highly he is rated. He is massive.
 
ryan did ok with his 10 minutes.haha

You happy today hybrid.I couldnt see anything wrong with how the bench was used today,

We should lap souths…...but i dont want to jinx us.lol
 
@tiger4ever said:
ryan did ok with his 10 minutes.haha

You happy today hybrid.I couldnt see anything wrong with how the bench was used today,

We should lap souths…...but i dont want to jinx us.lol
Click to expand...

Still don't think there is a need for a back on the bench, but if there is to be clearly Moltzen is the best choice for the #14.

Consistency is our main obstacle, we played very well today but one week at a time.

Bye has come at a good time given we should have Ellis and Gibbs back against Souffs…then Tuqiri back a week later.
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
Both Woods and BMM are beasts, geez we have some forwards coming through.
Click to expand...

The young forwards certainly showed today that we have planty of forward talent coming through. If we cannot hold onto all of them, I hope we can pick the RIGHT ones to keep. Makes you think we have a good future provided the Club finances stay solid and we keep bringing on the local young talent.
 
He certainly makes consistent yardage, even if the delivery to him is poor. He can still improve the speed of his PTB, but is definitely coming along in leaps and bounds.
 
@MightyMaggy said:
The young forwards certainly showed today that we have planty of forward talent coming through. If we cannot hold onto all of them, I hope we can pick the RIGHT ones to keep.
Click to expand...

Which one is the right one? There seems to be no consensus on this forum. Given the choice of keeping BMM, Fifita or Woods, I'd go for Woods. Not that I've seen enought of BMM to be a good judge.

I suspect if ANY of those 3 end up at another club, it'll come back to bite us on the arse one day. They all look like future guns to me.
 
@Masterton said:
@MightyMaggy said:
The young forwards certainly showed today that we have planty of forward talent coming through. If we cannot hold onto all of them, I hope we can pick the RIGHT ones to keep.

Which one is the right one? There seems to be no consensus on this forum. Given the choice of keeping BMM, Fifita or Woods, I'd go for Woods. Not that I've seen enought of BMM to be a good judge.

I suspect if ANY of those 3 end up at another club, it'll come back to bite us on the arse one day. They all look like future guns to me.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I dont think it matters, we cant go wrong with any of them. I change my mind every time i see them play to which is the best, we also have a couple good uns in the 20's. Prop is not an issue for us!
 
A Five year contract now .He will be the best prop in NRL by the age of 25 and you will get probably 7-8 years after that . C'mon Sheens and McDonnell hurry up and do the deal
 
Do we really need Blair with Woods, Fifita, BMM, Begovich, Schirnack etc etc coming thru? we already have the experience of galloway, payten and ellis to guide them through their initial seasons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 3,502 (members: 37, guests: 3,465)
Back
Top