Another Moltzen thread

Why? Aren't there enough already?
I did not enjoy watching him play last night, not at all. He looked like a kid too scared to play with the big boys in case he got hurt. He needs to gain confidence, more than match fitness, in State Cup.
 
Playing Moltzen at fullback was a double-whammy backfire.

Firstly, was he was not mentally up to playing there last night and Prince exploited it well.

Secondly, by not playing Moltzen at half back, it created a major disruption to our attacking structure. Benji played way too much dummy half/tap-taker so Robbie could instead play a lot of the half-back role. This, as much as bad refereeing or any other factor in the game, created our lack of cohesion with the ball.

For goodness sake, show some confidence in Miller so if the kid must be picked to replace Moltzen at half-back, let him be a half-back!! At least then, our 6 & 9 can do the great job we rely on!!

At the end of the day, playing Moltzen at full back when he is clearly not up to it and giving Miller a token role only at half is not in the best interests of the team or those players. We all saw the ramifications last year when a similar thing was done with Lazarus…
 
Moltz is slowly taking on Fitzy proportions

Until Beau gets back that is…
 
The naming of Moltzen at fullback is the funniest thing I had read since Souffs were talking up Willie Peters as the next Andrew Johns
 
![](http://knowyourmeme.com/system/icons/554/original/facepalm.jpg?1248715065)

thread fail
 
So many threads get merged because they are on the same subject, yet here we have an Admin starting a thread with no real opinion on a subject thats been discussed endlessely. Sorry, i know im a mod, but Kul, lets keep it real. Plenty of Moltz threads already mate. Tongue in cheek perhaps??????? Id say so. Maybe will we get the hint.
 
Closing this one on the basis it's not constructive and not going anywhere.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top