tigerlogic
New member
Blair for five weeks! Thoughts???
Seems harsh to me
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
Seems harsh to me
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
Blair for 5
- Thread starter tigerlogic
- Start date
A
alien
Guest
fine with me. it means wests wont have to play against him in the finals
It should mean he's free to play for us from round 1 too.
A
alien
Guest
@Suzie-Q said:
thats right because if storm dont make the grandfinal, the trials next year will be enough for him to play round 1 next season :slight_smile:
T
TigerPete104
Guest
It's actually win win win for us:
1\. We don't have to play against him.
2\. He won't get injured this season.
3\. He'll be ready for next season straight away.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
1\. We don't have to play against him.
2\. He won't get injured this season.
3\. He'll be ready for next season straight away.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
C
Craig_D
Guest
It means he comes to us injury free.. A big win for us all round I reckon!!!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
That's right. He'll miss this week, melbourne have two games minimum in the finals as they will finish 1st or 2nd. And two trials next year makes five.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
What happened with Glenn Stewart.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
@alien said:
That's how I was thinking too. We usually have 2 NRL sanctioned trials, don't we?
Tiger_Watto
New member
Will he be able to play in the Four Nations?
Marshall_magic
New member
@Cultured Bogan said:
His hearing only just started. Blair went first.
EDIT: Had his hearing ajourned 24 hours.
Win Win for WT.
Note 5 weeks not 5 games.
Should be clear to play for NZ
Note 5 weeks not 5 games.
Should be clear to play for NZ
biggest_tigers_fan
New member
Blair should of got 1 and brett stewart should of got 5
Joel Helmes
Well-known member
He will be nice and fresh and ready to go come round one.
And as others have said we wont have to face him again!
And as others have said we wont have to face him again!
A
alien
Guest
@Suzie-Q said:
hmm 2 or 3
Citizen_Tiger
New member
Not good for Melbourne, but guarantees us not just an injury free player for 2012, but a weaker Melbourne should we meet them in the finals.
Regardless of the advantages it presents us, I'm just gobsmacked that Blair could have been given 5 weeks for protecting himself against a pre-meditated attack by one of the 'Deliverance' brothers. Perhaps 2 weeks for those few uppercuts in the original blue, but 5 weeks for defending himself? Sorry, that's an emotional decision by the judiciary.
As for the brothers grub, 10 weeks for Glen the 'in bred' and 6 for 'low brow' Brett. Won't happen though
Regardless of the advantages it presents us, I'm just gobsmacked that Blair could have been given 5 weeks for protecting himself against a pre-meditated attack by one of the 'Deliverance' brothers. Perhaps 2 weeks for those few uppercuts in the original blue, but 5 weeks for defending himself? Sorry, that's an emotional decision by the judiciary.
As for the brothers grub, 10 weeks for Glen the 'in bred' and 6 for 'low brow' Brett. Won't happen though
Bazzinator
New member
he gets two for the uppercuts that got him sin binned and three for the second fight that he got sent off for just happy he wont miss any action for us
@Citizen Tiger said:
Defending himself against a pre-meditated attack. Are you serious? thats not what i saw.
He ran to catch up to stewart after they have both been binned, mouthed off at him, then pushed him. The second brawl was all his fault (well the start of it). If he just walks off at normal pace second brawl doesnt happen.
