Boston Bomber..

@Yossarian said:
@turnstyle said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Guys are on death row for yrs over there. He could be on death row for 20 yrs. Will be interesting if the bleeding hearts who are supposedly against the death penalty protest this.

people of all walks of life have different views on capital punishment.

i personally am against it, as i dont believe any human has the right to end another's life. i know he has done so, but please lets not get into that.

as far as crime and punishment goes though, as with the bali people, if you break a law you must suffer the consequences as they are deemed by the government of where you did it.

So you've got no problem with women who have been raped being stoned to death for adultery? Or people being gaoled or sentenced to death for changing religion?

not getting into it yoss.
 
@CocaCola said:
@Yossarian said:
@CocaCola said:
Anyone familiar with predictive programming?

Interesting episode from Family Guy regarding the Boston Marathon. Watch the first 9 min. Coincidence or false flag?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X289sq1pLk

Dude… I'd say complete and utter s*** is more accurate... I stopped watching when one of the items of "evidence" links a reference to a bowl of M & Ms in FG with the fact there was a chocolate shop that sold M & Ms was located near the bombing site. Moronic stuff like that doesn't deserve a more thorough dissection.

It wouldn't have hurt to watch another 4 min of footage, as the later part refers to the actual bombs detonating and the muslim suspect (which gave him the phone in the episode).
personally I think it's more then coincide that these scenes were part of that actual episodes that aired 1 month before the bombings.
There are other predictive programming clips regarding 9/11\. But I suppose not everyone finds this kind of stuff intriguing.

And yet nobody finds these things obvious before the event. The clips apparently have been manipulated - Peter Griffin drives into the Marathon runners.

Sorry I have no time for conspiracy theories like this. They're insulting to the victims and misuse facts or flat out make up things to support their case. And they put the emphasis on others to disprove their thesis.
 
@Yossarian said:
Sorry I have no time for conspiracy theories like this. They're insulting to the victims and misuse facts or flat out make up things to support their case. And they put the emphasis on others to disprove their thesis.

See, now this I don't understand. How is it insulting to victims by disagreeing with the official story? In theorists minds they only want the truth about what happened to the victims. Take 9/11 for example. People say its disrespectful to the victims to say it was an inside job, why? No one is attacking the victims, they're just saying they died under different circumstances to the ones that have been reported. The only theory that is disrespectful is the one where some have claimed that there were actually no victims on 9/11 and that their identities were made up. That's disrespectful to the families, but if you're going to question the Government, sure call them ''loonies'', but they're not disrespecting the families. Hell, some of the families themselves don't believe the official story, just see Jeremy Glick.

As far the Boston Bombing goes, I can only assume that the accused is responsible. Even if that's the case, people questioning it aren't disrespecting the victims, in their minds they just want the true perpetrators held responsible.

There's nothing wrong with questioning the Government, it should be encouraged.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Yossarian said:
Sorry I have no time for conspiracy theories like this. They're insulting to the victims and misuse facts or flat out make up things to support their case. And they put the emphasis on others to disprove their thesis.

See, now this I don't understand. How is it insulting to victims by disagreeing with the official story? In theorists minds they only want the truth about what happened to the victims. Take 9/11 for example. People say its disrespectful to the victims to say it was an inside job, why? No one is attacking the victims, they're just saying they died under different circumstances to the ones that have been reported. The only theory that is disrespectful is the one where some have claimed that there were actually no victims on 9/11 and that their identities were made up. That's disrespectful to the families, but if you're going to question the Government, sure call them ''loonies'', but they're not disrespecting the families. Hell, some of the families themselves don't believe the official story, just see Jeremy Glick.

As far the Boston Bombing goes, I can only assume that the accused is responsible. Even if that's the case, people questioning it aren't disrespecting the victims, in their minds they just want the true perpetrators held responsible.

There's nothing wrong with questioning the Government, it should be encouraged.

Exactly, its the people who question the government and look a little deeper into whats going on who care the most about human suffering.

The masses who just accept what they are being force fed are a big part of everything that is wrong with the world.

Grab another Big Mac, head down to your low socio-ecominc corner bottle shop, click on the latest Kardashian story, the things we do.

Question things, nah thats too hard.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Yossarian said:
Sorry I have no time for conspiracy theories like this. They're insulting to the victims and misuse facts or flat out make up things to support their case. And they put the emphasis on others to disprove their thesis.

See, now this I don't understand. How is it insulting to victims by disagreeing with the official story? In theorists minds they only want the truth about what happened to the victims. Take 9/11 for example. People say its disrespectful to the victims to say it was an inside job, why? No one is attacking the victims, they're just saying they died under different circumstances to the ones that have been reported. The only theory that is disrespectful is the one where some have claimed that there were actually no victims on 9/11 and that their identities were made up. That's disrespectful to the families, but if you're going to question the Government, sure call them ''loonies'', but they're not disrespecting the families. Hell, some of the families themselves don't believe the official story, just see Jeremy Glick.

As far the Boston Bombing goes, I can only assume that the accused is responsible. Even if that's the case, people questioning it aren't disrespecting the victims, in their minds they just want the true perpetrators held responsible.

There's nothing wrong with questioning the Government, it should be encouraged.

I have my doubts about the whole story.
 
@cqtiger said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
Don't agree with capital punishment in any format. It's a throwback to our animalistic tendencies.

Gaol the bastard for life, and make him live a long useless existence.

I don't agree with capital punishment either but after reading about the 90 year old "mutilator" who died recently in prison, I am not 100%.

The reporter who knew him better than most said he admitted that he "knew that he would do it again if he got out". I am guessing that they aren't all like him so many would re-offend, even after many years of rehab in prison.

I'm also thinking that if someone murdered my family then I would convert to believing in capital punishment. I guess that would release my animalistic tendencies

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_

Oh look I'm sure if I were related to the families I'm sure my steadfast views would be rattled a little, and that's understandable. If the state sponsors killing people what message does that send? The core message is that taking a life is OK if there are extenuating circumstances. Then you introduce the grey area as everyone's opinion on what the deserving circumstances are differs from person to person.
 
@Tiger In The Gong said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Yossarian said:
Sorry I have no time for conspiracy theories like this. They're insulting to the victims and misuse facts or flat out make up things to support their case. And they put the emphasis on others to disprove their thesis.

See, now this I don't understand. How is it insulting to victims by disagreeing with the official story? In theorists minds they only want the truth about what happened to the victims. Take 9/11 for example. People say its disrespectful to the victims to say it was an inside job, why? No one is attacking the victims, they're just saying they died under different circumstances to the ones that have been reported. The only theory that is disrespectful is the one where some have claimed that there were actually no victims on 9/11 and that their identities were made up. That's disrespectful to the families, but if you're going to question the Government, sure call them ''loonies'', but they're not disrespecting the families. Hell, some of the families themselves don't believe the official story, just see Jeremy Glick.

As far the Boston Bombing goes, I can only assume that the accused is responsible. Even if that's the case, people questioning it aren't disrespecting the victims, in their minds they just want the true perpetrators held responsible.

There's nothing wrong with questioning the Government, it should be encouraged.

Exactly, its the people who question the government and look a little deeper into whats going on who care the most about human suffering.

The masses who just accept what they are being force fed are a big part of everything that is wrong with the world.

Grab another Big Mac, head down to your low socio-ecominc corner bottle shop, click on the latest Kardashian story, the things we do.

Question things, nah thats too hard.

not saying this is the case here, but:

We tend to accept that people in authority must be right. It's this assumption that Socrates wanted us to challenge by urging us to think logically about the nonsense they often come out with, rather than being struck dumb by their aura of importance and air of suave certainty.
 
@Tiger In The Gong said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Yossarian said:
Sorry I have no time for conspiracy theories like this. They're insulting to the victims and misuse facts or flat out make up things to support their case. And they put the emphasis on others to disprove their thesis.

See, now this I don't understand. How is it insulting to victims by disagreeing with the official story? In theorists minds they only want the truth about what happened to the victims. Take 9/11 for example. People say its disrespectful to the victims to say it was an inside job, why? No one is attacking the victims, they're just saying they died under different circumstances to the ones that have been reported. The only theory that is disrespectful is the one where some have claimed that there were actually no victims on 9/11 and that their identities were made up. That's disrespectful to the families, but if you're going to question the Government, sure call them ''loonies'', but they're not disrespecting the families. Hell, some of the families themselves don't believe the official story, just see Jeremy Glick.

As far the Boston Bombing goes, I can only assume that the accused is responsible. Even if that's the case, people questioning it aren't disrespecting the victims, in their minds they just want the true perpetrators held responsible.

There's nothing wrong with questioning the Government, it should be encouraged.

Exactly, its the people who question the government and look a little deeper into whats going on who care the most about human suffering.

The masses who just accept what they are being force fed are a big part of everything that is wrong with the world.

Grab another Big Mac, head down to your low socio-ecominc corner bottle shop, click on the latest Kardashian story, the things we do.

Question things, nah thats too hard.

For starters I don't appreciate the implied criticism that because I don't have time for conspiracy theories I am some sort of pop culture moron who doesn't question things. This is another issue I have with cospiracy theorists - that anyone who doesn't subscribe to their world viewpoint can be written off as naive or stupid. You know anything about me at all. On the contrary my job requires me to read and analyse a stack of information on a daily basis. If you want to discuss the failed coup in Burundi or the prospects for Haftar in Libya let me know. I have zero interest in the Kardashians or their fellow travellers.

I also have no issue with challenging the official record or government in general. But if the basis of your claim is Seth MacFarlane predicted the Boston Bombings and a key bit of evidence is a throwaway line on Family Guy that mentioned a chocolate sold at a shop near central Boston then I'm sorry but I'm not going to waste my time. If anyone has a real claim based on actual evidence let me know.
 
@Yossarian said:
@Tiger In The Gong said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Yossarian said:
Sorry I have no time for conspiracy theories like this. They're insulting to the victims and misuse facts or flat out make up things to support their case. And they put the emphasis on others to disprove their thesis.

See, now this I don't understand. How is it insulting to victims by disagreeing with the official story? In theorists minds they only want the truth about what happened to the victims. Take 9/11 for example. People say its disrespectful to the victims to say it was an inside job, why? No one is attacking the victims, they're just saying they died under different circumstances to the ones that have been reported. The only theory that is disrespectful is the one where some have claimed that there were actually no victims on 9/11 and that their identities were made up. That's disrespectful to the families, but if you're going to question the Government, sure call them ''loonies'', but they're not disrespecting the families. Hell, some of the families themselves don't believe the official story, just see Jeremy Glick.

As far the Boston Bombing goes, I can only assume that the accused is responsible. Even if that's the case, people questioning it aren't disrespecting the victims, in their minds they just want the true perpetrators held responsible.

There's nothing wrong with questioning the Government, it should be encouraged.

Exactly, its the people who question the government and look a little deeper into whats going on who care the most about human suffering.

The masses who just accept what they are being force fed are a big part of everything that is wrong with the world.

Grab another Big Mac, head down to your low socio-ecominc corner bottle shop, click on the latest Kardashian story, the things we do.

Question things, nah thats too hard.

For starters I don't appreciate the implied criticism that because I don't have time for conspiracy theories I am some sort of pop culture moron who doesn't question things. This is another issue I have with cospiracy theorists - that anyone who doesn't subscribe to their world viewpoint can be written off as naive or stupid. You know anything about me at all. On the contrary my job requires me to read and analyse a stack of information on a daily basis. If you want to discuss the failed coup in Burundi or the prospects for Haftar in Libya let me know. I have zero interest in the Kardashians or their fellow travellers.

I also have no issue with challenging the official record or government in general. But if the basis of your claim is Seth MacFarlane predicted the Boston Bombings and a key bit of evidence is a throwaway line on Family Guy that mentioned a chocolate sold at a shop near central Boston then I'm sorry but I'm not going to waste my time. If anyone has a real claim based on actual evidence let me know.

Dont take it so personally dude, was talking in general. Although you may have been quoted earlier in the conversation i was just adding to GNR's post.
 
Yeah ok. Its Americas fault.Isnt it always. :crazy How about you and all your supporters piss off out of America. Shes nearly as bad as some of our posters on here.

[http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/boston-marathon-bombers%e2%80%99-mum-us-will-burn-for-son%e2%80%99s-death/ar-BBjVCRe?ocid=LENDHP](http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/boston-marathon-bombers%E2%80%99-mum-us-will-burn-for-son%E2%80%99s-death/ar-BBjVCRe?ocid=LENDHP)
 
Jerry,she is a mother,she can't see the wrong in what her son has done..blind love I think..

As for the posters on our forum,they have a right of an opinion as have you,if we were all the same it would be the most boring forum of all time…geez I can't agree with some of the knuckleheads on here(the Maroon coloured ones in particular),but they are all part of our forum family and we try and be civil to each other as best we can...cheers Jerry...
 
@underdog said:
![](http://blog.theregularguynyc.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/DUDE-WTF-IS-WRONG-WITH-YOU.jpg)

You talking to me or the mother who has crapped on the country who gave her and her sons an opportunity of a better life only to repay them with eternal hatred after two of her sons tried to murder hundreds.Hmmmmmmm. Me Im fine. You on the other hand sound quite retarded if you believe Im the one with the problem.

#I will ride with you…..........But not if its into the twin towers. As you sit there calling me stupid underdog. Grow up hater.
 
@TrueTiger said:
Jerry,**she is a mother,she can't see the wrong in what her son has done..blind love I think..**

As for the posters on our forum,they have a right of an opinion as have you,if we were all the same it would be the most boring forum of all time…geez I can't agree with some of the knuckleheads on here(the Maroon coloured ones in particular),but they are all part of our forum family and we try and be civil to each other as best we can...cheers Jerry...

Nothing to do with being his mother rather 100% being a religious nutbag muslim extremist.

To Quote her -

"They think that they are killing us and they celebrate this but we are the ones who will rejoice when Allah grants us the chance to behold them in the flames of an eternal and terrifying fire, an otherworldly flame"

"America is the real terrorist and everyone knows that."
\
\
I wonder where the kids got their ideas? She should be locked up with them for child abuse.
 
@TrueTiger said:
Jerry,she is a mother,she can't see the wrong in what her son has done..blind love I think..

As for the posters on our forum,they have a right of an opinion as have you,if we were all the same it would be the most boring forum of all time…geez I can't agree with some of the knuckleheads on here(the Maroon coloured ones in particular),but they are all part of our forum family and we try and be civil to each other as best we can...cheers Jerry...

How many Australian mothers would say that. She doesn't show remorse fine but to crap on the whole nation of over 300 million for the evilness her two sons displayed is abhorrent. You certainly are the voice of reason TT but So that these attacks don't become a daily occurrence there is no voice of reason deserved for these maggots of society they need to be eradicated. Simple.
 
@fairdinkum said:
@TrueTiger said:
Jerry,**she is a mother,she can't see the wrong in what her son has done..blind love I think..**

As for the posters on our forum,they have a right of an opinion as have you,if we were all the same it would be the most boring forum of all time…geez I can't agree with some of the knuckleheads on here(the Maroon coloured ones in particular),but they are all part of our forum family and we try and be civil to each other as best we can...cheers Jerry...

Nothing to do with being his mother rather 100% being a religious nutbag muslim extremist.

To Quote her -

"They think that they are killing us and they celebrate this but we are the ones who will rejoice when Allah grants us the chance to behold them in the flames of an eternal and terrifying fire, an otherworldly flame"

"America is the real terrorist and everyone knows that."
\
\
I wonder where the kids got their ideas? She should be locked up with them for child abuse.

Absolutely right Fairdinkum,I was more so looking from the mothers side as being a mother..to mention a quote"the Apple doesnt fall far from the tree" ….I think you have nailed it......
 
Back
Top