Pawsandclaws
New member
I still believe that kick from Tedesco was the turning point. Had we kicked for field position on the fifth tackle and played percentage football I'm sure the game would have been a lot closer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:Nathan Cleary vs Brooks - Daylight
One full of confidence with a day to make decisions and the other doubting himself too much
Brooks needs t back himself, he needs to own it
He is still not owning the team and i doubt he will
\
\
Thankfully Lolo is finding form which is taking pressure off Brooks
Just image having JLJ next to him.. Mess and a half we would have been
The key difference between them two is the pack they each have laying the platform. Penriths forwards are a age above ours. It's why he has a lot of time to make decisions
@ said:I still believe that kick from Tedesco was the turning point. Had we kicked for field position on the fifth tackle and played percentage football I'm sure the game would have been a lot closer.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Nathan Cleary vs Brooks - Daylight
One full of confidence with a day to make decisions and the other doubting himself too much
Brooks needs t back himself, he needs to own it
He is still not owning the team and i doubt he will
\
\
Thankfully Lolo is finding form which is taking pressure off Brooks
Just image having JLJ next to him.. Mess and a half we would have been
The key difference between them two is the pack they each have laying the platform. Penriths forwards are a age above ours. It's why he has a lot of time to make decisions
I fail to understand this, how is a better forward pack going to improve Brooks ability to finish our sets with a better kick?
How is it going to improve his decision making?
How is it going to improve his execution?
I understand that halves have more time when they're on the front foot because their forwards are creating space for them but NO forward pack dominates for 80mins. Rugby league normally changes momentum during games, we get our share of momentum too, our forwards get a roll on and get offloads away and free up space for Brooks. My gripe with him is his poor decision making and poor finishes to sets a better forward pack won't address those issues.
@ said:@ said:Yep another Brooks thread, until he learns to take control of a game when his team needs him to I'm going to keep pointing him out.
Don't let two lucky bounces off kicks fool you into thinking he was good today, he wasn't awful by any stretch but once again he failed to do his number one job.
What are we feeling about him at the moment and looking towards the future?
I know a few are waiting to see how he goes in a new team next year but I can't see how a few new forwards and a different halves partner (who is also going ordinary I might add) is going to change the fact that his options and end of sets are atrocious.
Agree with most of it. Funny though how Brooks' 2 kicks are viewed as lucky, whereas if it was Cronk that kicked them people would be calling it genius. 90% of kicks are riding massively on luck to get a positive outcome IMO, especially once they bounce.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Nathan Cleary vs Brooks - Daylight
One full of confidence with a day to make decisions and the other doubting himself too much
Brooks needs t back himself, he needs to own it
He is still not owning the team and i doubt he will
\
\
Thankfully Lolo is finding form which is taking pressure off Brooks
Just image having JLJ next to him.. Mess and a half we would have been
The key difference between them two is the pack they each have laying the platform. Penriths forwards are a age above ours. It's why he has a lot of time to make decisions
I fail to understand this, how is a better forward pack going to improve Brooks ability to finish our sets with a better kick?
How is it going to improve his decision making?
How is it going to improve his execution?
I understand that halves have more time when they're on the front foot because their forwards are creating space for them but NO forward pack dominates for 80mins. Rugby league normally changes momentum during games, we get our share of momentum too, our forwards get a roll on and get offloads away and free up space for Brooks. My gripe with him is his poor decision making and poor finishes to sets a better forward pack won't address those issues.
Short answer is yes, it will help him mske better decisions.
A more dominant pack definitely helps a halfs decision making becsuse it creates time and momentum. Behind a beaten pack you feel continually rushed and under pressure. Time is everything for a half.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:The key difference between them two is the pack they each have laying the platform. Penriths forwards are a age above ours. It's why he has a lot of time to make decisions
I fail to understand this, how is a better forward pack going to improve Brooks ability to finish our sets with a better kick?
How is it going to improve his decision making?
How is it going to improve his execution?
I understand that halves have more time when they're on the front foot because their forwards are creating space for them but NO forward pack dominates for 80mins. Rugby league normally changes momentum during games, we get our share of momentum too, our forwards get a roll on and get offloads away and free up space for Brooks. My gripe with him is his poor decision making and poor finishes to sets a better forward pack won't address those issues.
Short answer is yes, it will help him mske better decisions.
A more dominant pack definitely helps a halfs decision making becsuse it creates time and momentum. Behind a beaten pack you feel continually rushed and under pressure. Time is everything for a half.
Are you saying that Brooks never gets time and momentum? Like I said our forwards also create space for Brooks sometimes, it's no excuse for poorly ended sets no excuse for poorly executed kicks, he's not under pressure on every kick.
@ said:I still believe that kick from Tedesco was the turning point. Had we kicked for field position on the fifth tackle and played percentage football I'm sure the game would have been a lot closer.
@ said:@ said:I still believe that kick from Tedesco was the turning point. Had we kicked for field position on the fifth tackle and played percentage football I'm sure the game would have been a lot closer.
I agree, Tedesco's late options lately have been horrendous, he needs to take a step back and be that support person, not be putting in kicks. I'm not saying he didn't try hard yesterday, but he was all running and no passing, with bad kick options.