"I wouldn't change a thing" - Cameron Ciraldo, Sunday 21st September 2025, post match press conference.
Penrith - 40
Bulldogs - 8
That was the score after the Panthers crossed first following halftime, before easing off. They went on to eliminate the Bulldogs in straight sets, sealing a 46–26 victory.
Phil Gould, one of the sharpest minds in rugby league, managed to lure “the best young footballer” he’s ever seen away from the Tigers. Ironically, those same Tigers — without that player — went on to beat the Bulldogs 28–14 (and it really should have been 28–8 if not for a fortunate try just before fulltime).
Meanwhile, one of the game’s highly rated young coaches made the call to replace Sexton — a genuine halfback who had steered the team to the top of the table — with Galvin, a natural five-eighth who had never played halfback at NRL level.
Fast forward, and Ciraldo shifted Burton out of five-eighth, where he had played 22 games this year, just to accommodate Galvin in the halves. Instead of sticking with the Sexton-Burton partnership that was working earlier, he restructured the spine and moved pieces around.
If Ciraldo truly believed in the long game, the smarter option might have been to let Galvin develop in NSW Cup this season, while allowing the established halves to keep the momentum. Instead, the side’s rhythm was disrupted mid-year, and the Bulldogs crashed out in straight sets.
From the outside, it feels like an obvious outcome — so why didn’t Ciraldo see it? Is he thinking several steps ahead and willing to sacrifice 2025 for the future, or did he simply miss a golden chance to push deeper into the finals this year?
I’m struggling to understand why the club keeps insisting they wouldn’t change a thing. What am I missing here?
Penrith - 40
Bulldogs - 8
That was the score after the Panthers crossed first following halftime, before easing off. They went on to eliminate the Bulldogs in straight sets, sealing a 46–26 victory.
Phil Gould, one of the sharpest minds in rugby league, managed to lure “the best young footballer” he’s ever seen away from the Tigers. Ironically, those same Tigers — without that player — went on to beat the Bulldogs 28–14 (and it really should have been 28–8 if not for a fortunate try just before fulltime).
Meanwhile, one of the game’s highly rated young coaches made the call to replace Sexton — a genuine halfback who had steered the team to the top of the table — with Galvin, a natural five-eighth who had never played halfback at NRL level.
Fast forward, and Ciraldo shifted Burton out of five-eighth, where he had played 22 games this year, just to accommodate Galvin in the halves. Instead of sticking with the Sexton-Burton partnership that was working earlier, he restructured the spine and moved pieces around.
If Ciraldo truly believed in the long game, the smarter option might have been to let Galvin develop in NSW Cup this season, while allowing the established halves to keep the momentum. Instead, the side’s rhythm was disrupted mid-year, and the Bulldogs crashed out in straight sets.
From the outside, it feels like an obvious outcome — so why didn’t Ciraldo see it? Is he thinking several steps ahead and willing to sacrifice 2025 for the future, or did he simply miss a golden chance to push deeper into the finals this year?
I’m struggling to understand why the club keeps insisting they wouldn’t change a thing. What am I missing here?