Chee Kam

Seantice

New member
Im not sure who we will have next year but id like to have a better rotation with our forwards.

Thinking this for our backrow.

11\. mcqueen
12\. E Taylor
13\. chee kam

the kid has good size and has a go. If we could develop him over the off season he could make a good lock.

Elijah playing on the edge will lower his workrate which will hopefully mean he can play 80 minutes.
Mcqueen the same.

If our backrow can play 80 min then we can rotate our big boppers more frequently allowing more intense runs and defence over a shorter period.

Lawrence, sue and elijah coming off is a joke..
 
@ said:
Im not sure who we will have next year but id like to have a better rotation with our forwards.

Thinking this for our backrow.

11\. mcqueen
12\. E Taylor
13\. chee kam

the kid has good size and has a go. If we could develop him over the off season he could make a good lock.

Elijah playing on the edge will lower his workrate which will hopefully mean he can play 80 minutes.
Mcqueen the same.

If our backrow can play 80 min then we can rotate our big boppers more frequently allowing more intense runs and defence over a shorter period.

Lawrence, sue and elijah coming off is a joke..

I like MCK,he has been shuffled around much like Rankin,playing out of position,Chee Kam played well on Sunday and I honestly think he held his own,don't forget he has been in ISP cup for 2 years
And now has been put into NRL to fill a spot..When Idris comes back I hope they put Mick in the backrow,I think he will go ok there…But then again I don't know that much ...
 
Agree with you TT. I'd have MCK start in the backrow, Rowdy to the bench (have him attack tired/inexperienced oppo forwards), Idris to left centre, Kev to left wing and Suli to right centre.
 
MCK looks a bit lost in the centres and seems a bit small as a forward so it puzzles me as to where he fits,
 
MCK is probably one of those players that would go ok in a good side.

However in a poor side ehe just looks average.

Not quick enough for the centres, not quite strong enough for the back row.

He is not a mug and is not playing badly. However he won't worry any sides.
 
@ said:
MCK is probably one of those players that would go ok in a good side.

However in a poor side ehe just looks average.

Not quick enough for the centres, not quite strong enough for the back row.

He is not a mug and is not playing badly. However he won't worry any sides.

The most spot on assessment I've ever heard about a player, couldn't of said it better.
 
Back
Top