Coronavirus Outbreak

Status
Not open for further replies.
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

We had no community transmission, we just needed to control entry through appropriate quarantine measures and make a concerted push to increase vaccination rates so that we could move towards opening up. We didn't need to be cut off from the rest of the world, we just needed to put an effective quarantine barrier between ourselves and the rest of the world, which we failed to do. I appreciate that there would always have been a risk that even an effective quarantine barrier could have been breached, but ours was inevitably going to be breached given how lax and high-risk it was.
 
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

It's madness. Complete and utter madness. Any person telling you that we can continue this policy once we have vaccines available has it so so wrong.
 
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452014) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

We had no community transmission, we just needed to control entry through appropriate quarantine measures and make a concerted push to increase vaccination rates so that we could move towards opening up. We didn't need to be cut off from the rest of the world, we just needed to put an effective quarantine barrier between ourselves and the rest of the world, which we failed to do. I appreciate that there would always have been a risk that even an effective quarantine barrier could have been breached, but ours was inevitably going to be breached given how lax and high-risk it was.

Mate - you can't do this. The cost is huge. Plus the vaccines make this like any other respiratory disease.

We should ban meat. It would make the same difference in mortality rates. I'm actually exaggerating but I'm exaggerating in favor of a zero COVID policy. If we banned meat the effects of that would continue for years on end. We'd permanently lower the mortality rate. With COVID we'd only lower the mortality rate until the unvaccinated develop natural immunity.

This is exceptionally good news.
 
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452016) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452014) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

We had no community transmission, we just needed to control entry through appropriate quarantine measures and make a concerted push to increase vaccination rates so that we could move towards opening up. We didn't need to be cut off from the rest of the world, we just needed to put an effective quarantine barrier between ourselves and the rest of the world, which we failed to do. I appreciate that there would always have been a risk that even an effective quarantine barrier could have been breached, but ours was inevitably going to be breached given how lax and high-risk it was.

Mate - you can't do this. The cost is huge. Plus the vaccines make this like any other respiratory disease.

We should ban meat. It would make the same difference in mortality rates. I'm actually exaggerating but I'm exaggerating in favor of a zero COVID policy. If we banned meat the effects of that would continue for years on end. We'd permanently lower the mortality rate. With COVID we'd only lower the mortality rate until the unvaccinated develop natural immunity.

This is exceptionally good news.

I wasn't talking about doing it indefinitely, I was talking about doing it so that we could live freely *while* we got vaccination rates up. It is exactly what we were doing until this outbreak, we just showed no urgency with vaccination then. It failed because the quarantine measures failed. There is no going back to it now because it is just not realistic to think that we can get COVID cases from the level they are at now back down to zero within the next 6 months even with strict lockdown measures.
 
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452018) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452016) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452014) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

We had no community transmission, we just needed to control entry through appropriate quarantine measures and make a concerted push to increase vaccination rates so that we could move towards opening up. We didn't need to be cut off from the rest of the world, we just needed to put an effective quarantine barrier between ourselves and the rest of the world, which we failed to do. I appreciate that there would always have been a risk that even an effective quarantine barrier could have been breached, but ours was inevitably going to be breached given how lax and high-risk it was.

Mate - you can't do this. The cost is huge. Plus the vaccines make this like any other respiratory disease.

We should ban meat. It would make the same difference in mortality rates. I'm actually exaggerating but I'm exaggerating in favor of a zero COVID policy. If we banned meat the effects of that would continue for years on end. We'd permanently lower the mortality rate. With COVID we'd only lower the mortality rate until the unvaccinated develop natural immunity.

This is exceptionally good news.

I wasn't talking about doing it indefinitely, I was talking about doing it so that we could live freely *while* we got vaccination rates up. It is exactly what we were doing until this outbreak, we just showed **no urgency with vaccination then.** It failed because the quarantine measures failed. There is no going back to it now because it is just not realistic to think that we can get COVID cases from the level they are at now back down to zero within the next 6 months even with strict lockdown measures.

You are correct however the bolded part is the issue. I think since we have this horrendous outbreak people are starting to get it.

I don't care about downvotes. I've been downvoted so much I really don't care. You were downvoted on your post and I see nothing that wrong with what you are stating.
 
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452025) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452018) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452016) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452014) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

We had no community transmission, we just needed to control entry through appropriate quarantine measures and make a concerted push to increase vaccination rates so that we could move towards opening up. We didn't need to be cut off from the rest of the world, we just needed to put an effective quarantine barrier between ourselves and the rest of the world, which we failed to do. I appreciate that there would always have been a risk that even an effective quarantine barrier could have been breached, but ours was inevitably going to be breached given how lax and high-risk it was.

Mate - you can't do this. The cost is huge. Plus the vaccines make this like any other respiratory disease.

We should ban meat. It would make the same difference in mortality rates. I'm actually exaggerating but I'm exaggerating in favor of a zero COVID policy. If we banned meat the effects of that would continue for years on end. We'd permanently lower the mortality rate. With COVID we'd only lower the mortality rate until the unvaccinated develop natural immunity.

This is exceptionally good news.

I wasn't talking about doing it indefinitely, I was talking about doing it so that we could live freely *while* we got vaccination rates up. It is exactly what we were doing until this outbreak, we just showed **no urgency with vaccination then.** It failed because the quarantine measures failed. There is no going back to it now because it is just not realistic to think that we can get COVID cases from the level they are at now back down to zero within the next 6 months even with strict lockdown measures.

You are correct however the bolded part is the issue. I think since we have this horrendous outbreak people are starting to get it.

I don't care about downvotes. I've been downvoted so much I really don't care. You were downvoted on your post and I see nothing that wrong with what you are stating.

Probably just someone who mindlessly downvotes anything that is critical of the Liberal party or, more likely "the right", even though this has absolutely nothing to do with left/right political ideology.
 
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452014) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

We had no community transmission, we just needed to control entry through appropriate quarantine measures and make a concerted push to increase vaccination rates so that we could move towards opening up. We didn't need to be cut off from the rest of the world, we just needed to put an effective quarantine barrier between ourselves and the rest of the world, which we failed to do. I appreciate that there would always have been a risk that even an effective quarantine barrier could have been breached, but ours was inevitably going to be breached given how lax and high-risk it was.

The issue is moving forward that isn't sustainable, 80% vax rate doesn't kill the disease, it will still be around. If you want a 0 covid case number the only way is to isolate your country from the rest of the world.
 
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452018) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452016) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452014) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452000) said:
@nelson said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451996) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451953) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451931) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451781) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451774) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

I'm trying to avoid large numbers and percentages as most can't get their head around it, as it seems incomprehensible and meaningless to some. That and wont happen to me syndrome. Showing the numbers on a more personal and neighbourhood level and the light bulb goes on, at least for some.

I checked your figures and I think you've understated the number a little. Not much and it misses the point. The point is this is how do you get people to realize this is a disaster unlike anything we've ever seen in terms of loss of human life.

I'm amazed people still believe this is some sort of fraud. I see crazy anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists in America stating something is killing people but they don't know what it is that is killing people. Can you imagine it.

The rallies yesterday were full of people saying that the virus isn't real. So it is not just the USA.

It's a small percentage though. They are the crazy right/conspiracy theorists.

People are so easily led. There was one podcast referred to on here so confidently at one point. The people running it were smart people. They just weren't the right people to discuss COVID and they got it so wrong in my opinion it was criminal. The podcast was taken down because the information was so wrong.

I'm starting to think we've beaten this. I'm a bit too confident because the proviso is we get to 80% people fully vaccinated. If we do this I think at this point we've beaten COVID. We've beaten it with such a low mortality rate compared to other countries.

We really need to get past this idea of 0 covid cases though. The idea is you eventually have a lot of cases as with high vaccination rates you really lower the seriousness of the disease. I know you agree with this as well but I just think it is important to add to your point because at present I think we have a couple of states that are still going to push for border closures even after we hit 80%. A covid free society is just not possible, a lot of the virus' that cause the flu are variants of the Spanish Flu. Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

It was feasible to have a zero COVID approach prior to this outbreak, at least until vaccination rates hit desirable targets across the country. I don't think it's feasible any longer. If COVID is running free in NSW then there is little point in the other states trying to maintain hard borders for any length of time as they just won't work. They'll constantly be beset by little seeding events by rule breakers and even honest mistakes and will be forced back into lockdowns. NSW is just too big a population and too big an economic centre for the other states to effectively shut it out to the extent that would be needed to contain this delta strain. WA might be able to get away with it because there are borders between borders, but that's it.

I don't think it was feasible even before this outbreak, that would have meant cutting ourselves off from the rest of the world for a very long time and that is just not feasible.

We had no community transmission, we just needed to control entry through appropriate quarantine measures and make a concerted push to increase vaccination rates so that we could move towards opening up. We didn't need to be cut off from the rest of the world, we just needed to put an effective quarantine barrier between ourselves and the rest of the world, which we failed to do. I appreciate that there would always have been a risk that even an effective quarantine barrier could have been breached, but ours was inevitably going to be breached given how lax and high-risk it was.

Mate - you can't do this. The cost is huge. Plus the vaccines make this like any other respiratory disease.

We should ban meat. It would make the same difference in mortality rates. I'm actually exaggerating but I'm exaggerating in favor of a zero COVID policy. If we banned meat the effects of that would continue for years on end. We'd permanently lower the mortality rate. With COVID we'd only lower the mortality rate until the unvaccinated develop natural immunity.

This is exceptionally good news.

I wasn't talking about doing it indefinitely, I was talking about doing it so that we could live freely *while* we got vaccination rates up. It is exactly what we were doing until this outbreak, we just showed no urgency with vaccination then. It failed because the quarantine measures failed. There is no going back to it now because it is just not realistic to think that we can get COVID cases from the level they are at now back down to zero within the next 6 months even with strict lockdown measures.

Covid cases will never get back to zero, that is the point I am making. At some point the cases would have had to be allowed to increase. One of point I will raise is I think we wouldn't have got anywhere near 80% vax rates without this outbreak. Please do not take this as me saying the outbreak has been a good thing to happen. Just making a point.
 
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

There are so many flaws in that data that it is totally useless and irrelevant and in no way supports your forecast of 10,000 deaths in a year.

Where to start....

Ok first that Worldometer stats you took are for almost two years and the VAST majority of that time, there are no vaccines.

The data you used is for all variants.

If we get to 80% vaccination then the simple maths does not apply because the virus is an infectious disease and relies on an vulnerable pool to replicate. If susceptible people are down to 20-30% of the population, infection rates will reduce simple based on simple physical distancing and rates of probability.
 
At least they still have their sense of humour


![20210822_131652.jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1629603722901-20210822_131652.jpg)
 
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

Have 7 million people died in the US?

Your maths is freakin horrendous. You should stop.
 
@jadtiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451884) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

It is well below 2% of the people who have died from covid it is less than 0.3%.It is still far too many and high vaccine use should reduce the figure even more.The nutters on the right wing of politics(mainly in the USA) are the ones leading the antivax brigade and making the situation worse.We should all be thankful **we dont live in the USA as they still have a main political party refusing to give full support to either ***vaccination*****s or mask wearing.At least here we have bipartisan support on doing so even if a few from the right are actively in denial.

Which political parties in the US are not supporting vaccinations?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452128) said:
@jadtiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451884) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

It is well below 2% of the people who have died from covid it is less than 0.3%.It is still far too many and high vaccine use should reduce the figure even more.The nutters on the right wing of politics(mainly in the USA) are the ones leading the antivax brigade and making the situation worse.We should all be thankful **we dont live in the USA as they still have a main political party refusing to give full support to either ***vaccination*****s or mask wearing.At least here we have bipartisan support on doing so even if a few from the right are actively in denial.

Which political parties in the US are not supporting vaccinations?


Republicans are not giving it full support mainly in the southern states.Sadly that is where the main outbreaks are happening now
 
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451990) said:
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451963) said:
Likewise I think we will see variants of covid circulating in the community in the future.

Maybe but this is not a big issue. Here is the thing. The delta stain is twice as contagious. It isn't that contagious if you've already had COVID and the vaccines are holding up exceptionally well against the Delta strain.

***I have some cutting science*** on booster shots now. This is not mainstream and verified in massive data sets like previous information so it could be wrong when we get better data.

Then share it. You regularly post here that the science and data is all that matters. Post your data.

Politicians (and big Pharma) are the ones pushing booster shots now but there is ***some evidence (which means actual scientific papers)*** that exposing us to COVID post getting fully vaccinated may lead to greater long term immunity. We may end up with one of two booster shots but maybe it won't even be required.

Then post the links to the "actual scientific papers". It sounds like interesting information. Or o they mail it to your house? Post the links.
 
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451948) said:
@jadtiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451884) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

It is well below 2% of the people who have died from covid it is less than 0.3%.It is still far too many and high vaccine use should reduce the figure even more.The nutters on the right wing of politics(mainly in the USA) are the ones leading the antivax brigade and making the situation worse.We should all be thankful we dont live in the USA as they still have a main political party refusing to give full support to either vaccinations or mask wearing.At least here we have bipartisan support on doing so even if a few from the right are actively in denial.

***Just to be clear the figure*** in the US and the UK is about 2% ***of the population. I am not talking about 2% of the infected population***.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

USA - 1,935 deaths per million people
UK - 1,927deaths per million people
Just to be clear.....your ability to perform the simplest mathematics or analyse data is atrocious. You shouldnt do it.

1935 deaths per million people is 0.1935%

I am still fuming about the **dribble** that people have stated in relation to COVID. This ***disinformation has been intense and also intensely stupid.***

The dribble people here post frustrates me........for example there is this bloke here who posts that COVID *****has killed***** ***2% of the entire population of the US,,......7,000,000 people!!!*** Speaking of intensely stupid disinformation. The same person constantly states that the efficacy of vaccines doesnt matter and then posts that you are "8 times less likely to catch COVID if vaccinated". This same bloke also forecast a 5% case fatality rate for COVID in Australia and annual deaths of 10,000 in Australia.

Im with you Earl, this intensely stupid disinformation should stop.


The facts are this mountain of data that gets crunched and it's the ***best data I've ever seen in my life.***

You love the data Earl? If you love the data then read it properly, analyse it properly and then share it here, post it.
 
@jadtiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452133) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452128) said:
@jadtiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451884) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451771) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451769) said:
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451768) said:
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1451310) said:
I find it annoying that some people say that the disease doesn't have the signs of a deadly one. They fail to realise that lockdown is one of the reasons.

I did some rough numbers on this.

UK/USA have had about 2000 deaths per million people. Data from here:- https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Australia has a population of about 25 million.
Say we get to 80% vaccinated and everyone who is vaccinated is safe. That leaves 20% of the population as the percentage exposed to COVID.
In that scenario we'd get 10,000 deaths.

The flaws in those numbers are as follows:-

**1. The 2000 deaths per million population is over the course of the pandemic and not 1 year.**
2. That scenario assumes no deaths for vaccinated people.
3. Getting to 80% may be hard.

More people would die of heart disease and dementia compared to COVID.

Lower vaccination rates would chance the picture completely. If we were completely unvaccinated you are looking at 50 000 deaths which would be our biggest killer by far.

Happy for anyone to come up with rougher figures or point our anything I missed.

The way I view it though is if we can somehow get people vaccinated this isn't a big issue. The unvaccinated will also develop COVID and then develop immunity so deaths should decrease over time.

If people don't get vaccinated this would be a catastrophe. People are getting vaccinated though. From yesterdays figures I get a figure of 56% first dose protected in NSW. If we get to 80% by end of this lockdown and people follow through I think we can basically beat this.

https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/australias-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

For every 528 people in the US a person has died of Covid-19. 1 in 528. Think about that for a minute. That probable equates to 1 person in every street or two has died of Covid-19 in the US.

It's about 2 percent of the population. It's freaken horrendous.

I get a couple of broad takings out of this:-

1. Lockdowns/border closures in Australia have saved so many lives.
2. The Delta strain coming late in the pandemic has been exceptionally lucky for us. It's bad it's here but if the virus was this contagious at the start I think we'd be similar to the UK or the US.
3. Vaccines are going to save so many lives.

It is well below 2% of the people who have died from covid it is less than 0.3%.It is still far too many and high vaccine use should reduce the figure even more.The nutters on the right wing of politics(mainly in the USA) are the ones leading the antivax brigade and making the situation worse.We should all be thankful **we dont live in the USA as they still have a main political party refusing to give full support to either ***vaccination*****s or mask wearing.At least here we have bipartisan support on doing so even if a few from the right are actively in denial.

Which political parties in the US are not supporting vaccinations?


Republicans are not giving it full support mainly in the southern states.Sadly that is where the main outbreaks are happening now

POssibly should be in the politics thread, but Republicans ARE promoting vaccines but are against vaccine mandates or passports. Dont conflate the issues.

https://www.wfla.com/community/health/coronavirus/vaccines-are-saving-lives-desantis-stresses-importance-of-shots-as-florida-covid-cases-spike-criticizes-mask-mandates/

I also dont really see significant variance between the states based on Political parties.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-covid-19/vaccine-tracker
 
Good news is we have the highest vaccination rate in the world (at them moment) we are set to hit 6 million doses in the next couple of days.
 
@innsaneink said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1452113) said:
At least they still have their sense of humour


![20210822_131652.jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1629603722901-20210822_131652.jpg)

It'd be easier to just post a sign "Idiots live here".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top