Darren Lockyer - Tedesco and Brooks Will Play Rep Footy Next Year

Tony33

New member
http://m.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/anzac-test-if-cameron-smith-retired-tomorrow-who-could-succeed-the-kangaroos-skipper/story-fnp0lyn3-1227330451785

Anzac Test: If Cameron Smith retired tomorrow, who could succeed the Kangaroos skipper?

May 1, 2015 11:48pm
Darren LockyerThe Courier-Mail

'We need to hold the ball' says Cameron Smith
\
\
THE next 12 months will be a key transition for the Kangaroos and it is important Australian officials strike the right balance between experience and generational change.

I don’t necessarily agree this Australian team is getting too old for its own good. In the rep arena, big-game know-how cannot be undersold.

But with the World Cup two years away, some form of succession planning must take place and for mine, the biggest single issue confronting the Kangaroos is how to replace Cameron Smith.
\
\
Cameron Smith at Kangaroos training.
It is a multifaceted conundrum. It is not just Smith’s on-field hooking craftsmanship, which is obvious and brilliant, but also the leadership and ambassadorial void he will leave when the skipper is lost to the national team.

In other areas, the Kangaroos are well stocked. Greg Inglis can replace Billy Slater at fullback. Daly Cherry-Evans can cover for Johnathan Thurston and Ben Hunt or Luke Brooks are capable successors at halfback for Cooper Cronk.
\
\
But if Smith retired today, the next skipper and No.9 is not so obvious.

The absence of Smith would force the Kangaroos to put their entire operation under the microscope and assess how they want to play structurally. Would they want a hooker who, like Smith, can play the full 80 minutes? Or would coach Tim Sheens opt for a hooker who can absorb the opening 25 minutes, with the No.14 utility to come on and provide impact at the back end of halves?

This Anzac Test was not the moment to make wholesale changes but next year’s Four Nations tournament will be the right time for new faces to ensure the Kangaroos have the right blend of youth and experience for their World Cup defence in 2017.

Here are the “Magnificent Seven” I believe can one day wear green and gold and inject some fresh blood into the Australian side"

JACKSON BIRD (Sharks): Bird’s game against the Roosters last month, when the Sharks won their first game, convinced me he is a potential star. He reminds me a lot of Test legend Laurie Daley. Laurie was a great running five-eighth and Jackson has that ability. I also like his size and willingness to take on the line. Jackson is a thick-set guy so, like Laurie or Brad Fittler, he could easily play five-eighth or slot into lock. He would be a real handful running on an edge.

DYLAN NAPA (Roosters): Every pack needs an enforcer, a guy who isn’t intimidated, and I see that in Napa. He is no-frills but the one thing that really make him standout is his sheer size. He is an imposing figure with the ability to hurt guys in defence.

JAKE FRIEND (Roosters): Andrew McCullough at the Broncos has long been touted as Smith’s successor, but Jake is now knocking on the door. Smith is so good and so complete that every other hooker seems to be a level lower. I like Friend’s toughness and will be intrigued to see how he makes the jump to Origin and Test football.

MICHAEL MORGAN (Cowboys): Sometimes a guy like Morgan is so versatile it can be to his detriment, but I believe he can be a great utility for Australia. He is a bit like Luke Lewis in the sense that he can handle almost any task and has the size and skill to fill a bench spot.

MATT MOYLAN (Panthers): A class act. I see him as the next long-term fullback to succeed Billy Slater and Greg Inglis. Has great vision, the ability to ball-play and his stint in camp during last year’s Four Nations would have been a vital learning opportunity.

JAMES TEDESCO (Tigers): This guy is a pure excitement machine. Moylan’s presence could keep him out of the fullback role at Test level but I still believe he could have a huge impact from the wing. His speed is lethal and he has the finishing ability to flourish on the flanks.

LUKE BROOKS (Tigers): A special talent. He has a natural confidence and next year, he will be on NSW’s radar for State of Origin. This season is probably a bit early for an Origin baptism but within 12 months, I see Brooks making the jump to rep football. He has a minimum 10-year NRL career ahead of him and it’s only a matter of time before he wears green and gold.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
Greg Alexander also added this on Luke Brooks:

“Last year was his first full season after he debuted late in 2013 and wasn’t able to add to his first game due to the Tigers’ problems with the second-tier salary cap,” Alexander said.

“We realise what sort of talent a player like Luke Brooks has got. He’s got all the skills that a halfback needs to be a very successful one but it’s a tough position to become the boss of a team at such a young age.

“He’s still learning about his game and the pressures of first grade. There’s no doubt he’s going to have a long NRL career and you would think he would go to the next step and play representative football.

“He’s showed so much at a young age.”

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
Anyone else feel like Teddy would be wasted on the wing? He's such a dynamic runner that he needs to be on the ball as much as possible.
I'd rather him at fullback with Moylan and DCE/Hunt in the halves, or worse situation have him in the centres.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
Tedesco would be wasted at wing. He is so dynamic at fullback that in years to come he will make this position his own at all levels. Players will move to accommodate him not vica versa.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
 
The main thing DL is saying is they will need to find a spot for him as he is a class player… Moylan & Teddy will both play a lot of Rep Footy. There time will come.

Interesting on Napa. He is a big boy!
 
With Teddy , if he was to play wing if Moylan didn't have an issue you could interchange from time to time

Everyone talking about Moylan moving to 6 , no reason in the future Teddy couldn't play 6

The only question mark I would have on Teddy in a long kicking game , but apart from that he has every other skill that could make him a 6 and I reckon he would thrive with the added defensive workload
 
I honestly wonder if we would be better if Moses and Teddy swapped. I know people will roll their eyes quite rightly but Moses is capable of ball playing behind the line and short kicking like Tedesco. I think after looking back at the Dogs game Moses carved up in he can be doing what Jimmy is doing but I think Tedesco is a potential revelation at six.

As Happy said the question is on his long kicking but a guy of his talent can learn no doubt. He has everything else in his game to say he could do it. He is big enough, has great hands, good attacking kicks and would cause havoc closer to the play imo. It would bring Moses into the game and Tedesco could he anything at six.
 
@happy tiger said:
With Teddy , if he was to play wing if Moylan didn't have an issue you could interchange from time to time

Everyone talking about Moylan moving to 6 , no reason in the future Teddy couldn't play 6

The only question mark I would have on Teddy in a long kicking game , but apart from that he has every other skill that could make him a 6 and I reckon he would thrive with the added defensive workload

Playing Tedesco at 5/8 would be absolute madness. He has ball skills, but by playing him at 5/8, you're eliminating his best asset which is his running game. He'd be about as successful as Inglis playing there.

Moylan on the other hand could handle it cos he's more of a ball player. They're 2 different players, idk people constantly have to compare them.
 
Can you tell DL is a Queenslander - talk about, talk Smith up.

Not that difficult to replace. If he retired tomorrow (praise be to God) - He has never heard of Robbie Farah. A better player in my opinion and still has at least two years left at least in the Rep. arena. He says "All the others are a step down" - yeah right.
What Captain when they win - lets a team sing the QLD song - absolute disgrace and lets not get into other areas that are not worth revisiting.

We all know about Teddy - needs more time, needs to build up just a little (not much). He is the full back - put Moylan in, if there is a spot over next year - if not too bad. Maybe a great player in the making, maybe not but in my opinion he will not be half the full back Teddy will be.

Napa - one word "Meathead" - is now and always will be.
 
@MacDougall said:
I honestly wonder if we would be better if Moses and Teddy swapped. I know people will roll their eyes quite rightly but Moses is capable of ball playing behind the line and short kicking like Tedesco. I think after looking back at the Dogs game Moses carved up in he can be doing what Jimmy is doing but I think Tedesco is a potential revelation at six.

As Happy said the question is on his long kicking but a guy of his talent can learn no doubt. He has everything else in his game to say he could do it. He is big enough, has great hands, good attacking kicks and would cause havoc closer to the play imo. It would bring Moses into the game and Tedesco could he anything at six.

I'm rolling my eyes.

Moses will be brought into the game when JT lets him off the leash.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@happy tiger said:
With Teddy , if he was to play wing if Moylan didn't have an issue you could interchange from time to time

Everyone talking about Moylan moving to 6 , no reason in the future Teddy couldn't play 6

The only question mark I would have on Teddy in a long kicking game , but apart from that he has every other skill that could make him a 6 and I reckon he would thrive with the added defensive workload

Playing Tedesco at 5/8 would be absolute madness. He has ball skills, but by playing him at 5/8, you're eliminating his best asset which is his running game. He'd be about as successful as Inglis playing there.

Moylan on the other hand could handle it cos he's more of a ball player. They're 2 different players, idk people constantly have to compare them.

And you've never heard of running 5/8's Gunners

Fittler ,Daley ring a bell
 
@Russell said:
@MacDougall said:
I honestly wonder if we would be better if Moses and Teddy swapped. I know people will roll their eyes quite rightly but Moses is capable of ball playing behind the line and short kicking like Tedesco. I think after looking back at the Dogs game Moses carved up in he can be doing what Jimmy is doing but I think Tedesco is a potential revelation at six.

As Happy said the question is on his long kicking but a guy of his talent can learn no doubt. He has everything else in his game to say he could do it. He is big enough, has great hands, good attacking kicks and would cause havoc closer to the play imo. It would bring Moses into the game and Tedesco could he anything at six.

I'm rolling my eyes.

Moses will be brought into the game when JT lets him off the leash.

Moses was brought into the game last week and played pretty well, just needs a bit more time and he will be killing it.

_Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3_
 
@VanillaThunder said:
Anyone else feel like Teddy would be wasted on the wing? He's such a dynamic runner that he needs to be on the ball as much as possible.
I'd rather him at fullback with Moylan and DCE/Hunt in the halves, or worse situation have him in the centres.

I see Teddy as a fullback and not a winger. He might go okay on the wing but I think there would be better options.
 
@Russell said:
Can you tell DL is a Queenslander - talk about, talk Smith up.

Not that difficult to replace. If he retired tomorrow (praise be to God) - He has never heard of Robbie Farah. A better player in my opinion and still has at least two years left at least in the Rep. arena. He says "All the others are a step down" - yeah right.
What Captain when they win - lets a team sing the QLD song - absolute disgrace and lets not get into other areas that are not worth revisiting.

We all know about Teddy - needs more time, needs to build up just a little (not much). He is the full back - put Moylan in, if there is a spot over next year - if not too bad. Maybe a great player in the making, maybe not but in my opinion he will not be half the full back Teddy will be.

Napa - one word "Meathead" - is now and always will be.

I think Robbie is a better player but less consistently as good as Smith is. Still surely its an easy thing for Robbie to replace Smith and Australia wouldn't lose anything.
 
@stevetiger said:
@VanillaThunder said:
Anyone else feel like Teddy would be wasted on the wing? He's such a dynamic runner that he needs to be on the ball as much as possible.
I'd rather him at fullback with Moylan and DCE/Hunt in the halves, or worse situation have him in the centres.

I see Teddy as a fullback and not a winger. He might go okay on the wing but I think there would be better options.

Granted it was early in his career but when he played on the wing for the Tigers he didn't show much - especially in his options in defence.
Didn't see his games at centre for Italy but from what I hear he went ok.
In the end he's a fullback - Moylan is a ball player and would slot into five eight easily.
 
Smith is way ahead of Robbie when playing 'structured' footy. But sheer talent - Robbie is in another league. Personally, I think Isaac Luke is as good as both of them.
 
teddy is wasted at any position other than fullback in the same with greg inglis is wasted with slater there.

its just the way the cards fall unfortunately, but i think he'd make a KILLER centre. he plays so much like one when he chimes in that backline already and is such a great ballplayer/runner outwide.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top