southerntiger
New member
Hybrid,
I am in no way comparing Moltz to Fitz. Moltz is a good talented footballer whereas Fitz is not. My point was to show that the whole “we won 7/'7 with Moltz at 7" argument is bunk. Players should be assessed on how they perform, not merely because the team happened to perform well as a whole. We won on Sat night but that doesnt mean Fitz should be anywhere near our starting line up. That is my point.
As I have said repeatedly, Moltz is a very good player (albeit not a complete player as a 7). Stop trying to assert I dont rate Moltz.
Ron, my understanding is that Fitzy was a junior 5/8th (just like Moltz). Does that chnage your answer?
I am in no way comparing Moltz to Fitz. Moltz is a good talented footballer whereas Fitz is not. My point was to show that the whole “we won 7/'7 with Moltz at 7" argument is bunk. Players should be assessed on how they perform, not merely because the team happened to perform well as a whole. We won on Sat night but that doesnt mean Fitz should be anywhere near our starting line up. That is my point.
As I have said repeatedly, Moltz is a very good player (albeit not a complete player as a 7). Stop trying to assert I dont rate Moltz.
Ron, my understanding is that Fitzy was a junior 5/8th (just like Moltz). Does that chnage your answer?