Farah on the Bench

[larrycorowa]

Give him the same farewell we haves sheens and potter…we owe him nothing

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

Give him the same farewell we haves sheens and potter…we owe him nothing

Except what he's contracted for.

 

[palms]

Give him the same farewell we haves sheens and potter…we owe him nothing

Except what he's contracted for.

Which is what he is and always was intended to get no matter how this played/s out. A mute point that people keep bringing up.

 

[goldcoast_tiger]

The only way that was going to happen was if he agreed to a reduced pay out from the wests tigers.

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

 

[goldcoast_tiger]

Give him the same farewell we haves sheens and potter…we owe him nothing

Except what he's contracted for.

And pay him what he's contracted for. I hear the ANZ has some good loans on offer

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

Give him the same farewell we haves sheens and potter…we owe him nothing

Except what he's contracted for.

And pay him what he's contracted for. I hear the ANZ has some good loans on offer

I don't see the issue in paying him in instalments. It's likely how he is paid at the moment.

As I said, if he doesn't want to play State Cup in 2017 he'll have to meet the club halfway on some of the terms as much as it will eat him inside to do so.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

The only way that was going to happen was if he agreed to a reduced pay out from the wests tigers.

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair's salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

The only way that was going to happen was if he agreed to a reduced pay out from the wests tigers.

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair's salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Except he probably hated Blair and thought he should have gone for free.

 

[ricksen]

The only way that was going to happen was if he agreed to a reduced pay out from the wests tigers.

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair's salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Tim Grant is being paid by both Souths and Penrith this year I believe (as well as WT).

 

[tigers2005]

The only way that was going to happen was if he agreed to a reduced pay out from the wests tigers.

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair'is salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair's salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Except he probably hated Blair and thought he should have gone for free.

Its hard to take seriously, the moral high horse riding about the club doing the wrong thing by Farah when the club did the same thing to Galloway last yr and not a whisper was made. Its laughable.

 

[Byron_Bay_Fan]

Just watched those highlights against last raiders game, struth their no. 9 created havoc but RF was not supposed to do that. If Mitch can pull this one out of the hat then he can walk on water

 

[Gary_Bakerloo]

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair'is salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

And there we have it - the useless response that keeps the merry-go-round on this discussion ongoing. The basics of contract law and the precedents of 100's of other players in the NRL in similar payment situations all thrown away because there is no official statement from the club or Farah.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Don't understand what you mean by this. He has a contract for next season and it will be honoured from his perspective. Whether it is paid in full by Wests or a combination of Wests and another club, the contract from his perspective will be honoured. If either party doesn't honour the contract, then it is a breach of contract. I can't see the club or Farah doing that.

The only way he can get a reduced pay position would be for both parties to agree to part ways from the final year of the current contract and then enter into a new contract. Possible - it would mean that Farah remains a one club player, but would earn less than his current contract.

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair'is salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

Has what been confirmed?

 

[Cultured_Bogan]


 

[tigers2005]

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair'is salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

Has what been confirmed?

That the stalling of this saga is because he wants a full pay out on what he is owed up front. Because just as he has a right to get what he is owed, i dont think him or any player can demand for it to be paid up front.

 

[tigers2005]

Of course he will get his fullmoney, but not if WTs get their way.
Luckily they picked the wrong bloke to try this on. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that Farah
Will call their bluff. After all it's his decision as to what he does.

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair'is salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

And there we have it - the useless response that keeps the merry-go-round on this discussion ongoing. The basics of contract law and the precedents of 100's of other players in the NRL in similar payment situations all thrown away because there is no official statement from the club or Farah.

The issue thats being tossed up is that Farah wants his pay out from the tigers up front, which i just said i dont think he is entitled too. However my question was is this the real reason things are being stalled. Because unless you live under a rock there have been atleast 2 or 3 articles a week written about this saga since it started. Most of it from un -named sources or "close friends", so in actual fact BS. So what makes this article any different. Or are you upset you wrote more than one paragraph and no one acknowledged you lol. Weird….

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair'is salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

Has what been confirmed?

That the stalling of this saga is because he wants a full pay out on what he is owed up front. Because just as he has a right to get what he is owed, i dont think him or any player can demand for it to be paid up front.

Not even Farah's biggest critic will deny he's not entitled to every cent of the 950 he's owed. Its a ridiculous argument that has been peddled by some on here for 12 months. There's no legs to anyone saying otherwise.

Im not saying Farah is demanding one, despite a close associate of his and Ayoub's, Weidler tweeting that it was being discussed.

My only real issue is when people claim that Wests attempting to negotiate with another club to ease pressure on their cap is evil when its a frequent occurrence among all clubs.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Seriously, do you have any idea how contracts work? Do you know how many players in the comp atm would have some of their salary being paid by a former club? It's common practice. For you to think Wests are doing something evil by attempting to negotiate terms with another club to ease cap pressures shows either you have a very simplistic view of how how the cap works, or you are so embittered by the way the club has treated Farah, you expect every cent should come from them, no matter how financially crippling it may be. Either way, its madness.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but when we first signed Todd Payten, he was being paid by 3 clubs in his first season with us. Canberra, Roosters and us were all chipping in. And i'm pretty sure we paid some of Blair'is salary last yr in his first yr at the Broncos. By your logic we should have footed his entire salary for 2015.

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

And there we have it - the useless response that keeps the merry-go-round on this discussion ongoing. The basics of contract law and the precedents of 100's of other players in the NRL in similar payment situations all thrown away because there is no official statement from the club or Farah.

The issue thats being tossed up is that Farah wants his pay out from the tigers up front, which i just said i dont think he is entitled too. However my question was is this the real reason things are being stalled. Because unless you live under a rock there have been atleast 2 or 3 articles a week written about this saga since it started. Most of it from un -named sources or "close friends", so in actual fact BS. So what makes this article any different. Or are you upset you wrote more than one paragraph and no one acknowledged you lol. Weird….

Its not the article, its the fact there are some that endorse it and believe the club should pay him out in full. It's unprecedented

 

[tigers2005]

Has this even been confirmed by the Tigers or Farah. Or are you getting your knickers in a knot for no reason.

Has what been confirmed?

That the stalling of this saga is because he wants a full pay out on what he is owed up front. Because just as he has a right to get what he is owed, i dont think him or any player can demand for it to be paid up front.

Not even Farah's biggest critic will deny he's not entitled to every cent of the 950 he's owed. Its a ridiculous argument that has been peddled by some on here for 12 months. There's no legs to anyone saying otherwise.

Im not saying Farah is demanding one, despite a close associate of his and Ayoub's, Weidler tweeting that it was being discussed.

My only real issue is when people claim that Wests attempting to negotiate with another club to ease pressure on their cap is evil when its a frequent occurrence among all clubs.

In the last week we have had farah suing the club, the club trying to re-negotiate his pay out and now farah asking for his pay out up front. Could they all be true, yes, could they all be false, yes. Does anyone on here really know?? No.

I just hope it gets finalised before Sunday. Even the players have come out and said he deserves a farewell. That way we can say goodbye to farah and celebrate making semis for the frst time in yonks.