Fresh twist in Tigers saga: Holmes should’ve been penalised for illegal kick-off

Things I hate about NRL rules at the moment

1: Play the ball - rarely played back with the foot
2: Scrums - why have them if they are not contestable
3: Offside at the play the ball - attacking team always has a blocker at the play the ball to protect the kicker
4: Voluntary tackles - to protect the ball or might be tackled over the sideline or in goal should not be allowed
5 : Walking or crawling of the mark - penalise them, its in the rules
6: Passing after being called held - penalise them, its in the rules
7: Knock backs regularly called knock ons - every game has this issue
8: Using legs in the tackle - dangerous and illegal another form of tripping
9: Pushing in the tackle - attacking team come in and push their player forward in the tackle e.g. rugby style
10: The down town rule - players in front of the kicker, the ball kicker should be made to run them onside or chasers must be behind the kicker
11: Dominant tackle - a tackle is a tackle, once made get of the player
12: Players out of position at the scrum - Forwards must be made to play in the scrum
13: Players to the sin bin - If a player is put on report and the affected player leaves for a HIA the offending player must spend 10 minutes in the bin

Probably many more issues as well

Interested to hear your thoughts
That's not a bad start Dallas, and I bet you're only just warming up.
 
So apparently WestTigers have hired higher legal advice and we are still yet to receive the Audit and transcripts we requested on Monday..
This has cover-up writing all over it and major concerns for NRL and there integrity. Why else would they not produce these as requested if they have nothing to hide.
If this is true I think our odds might have just increased
Annesley’s body language suggested he was lying when he said in the press conference that the Tigers were welcome to come into NRL headquarters right now to listen to the audio.
 
Back
Top