Glass half full?

Play Galvin at 13 (which is a ridiculous concept within itself), you run the risk of losing him. Why do that?
Or you put Galvin at 7 and Sezer at 13. Ball player, kicker, good defender and then Pole moves into prop rotation.

I just think Sezer has made such a difference. Maybe I need to see more of Luai at 7.

Remember when Sheens persisted with Benji at 7? Epic fail.
 
I’m not convinced Luai is a game manager. He is a 6.

I’d go.

6-Luai
7-Sezer
13-Galvin

14-Fainu (although I’m not convinced on him either)
He does a great job at 6. Is it because he’s doing what the coach wants him to do?
Just my opinion, but I think he has the talent to adjust, but it won’t happen overnight.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top