Harsh reality
The Tim Sheens dismissal is still causing ructions at Wests Tigers - his comments that Robbie Farah and Benji Marshall led to his dismissal are an issue. Marshall has taken up the matter with Sheens - Farah is choosing to ignore it, saying: ''That's the past''. What has been ignored is the Tigers' lack of results in recent years. Sheens did very well winning a comp in 2005 when they rode home on Marshall's brilliance - but since that time results have been scarce. Far worse than the lack of results is the questionable recruitment. The signing which has caused the most angst among the players was Adam Blair from the Storm. He was paid $550,000 - a hefty price for a forward - but worse, Bryce Gibbs and Andrew Fifita had to be let go and paid out so they could play at the Sharks. The turnaround means Blair in effect cost the Tigers about $800,000 a year. Sheens was his strongest advocate. Senior players didn't roll Sheens - they were asked their view but declined to get involved. Recruitment and results hurt Sheens in the end.
\
\
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/dank-took-sharks-wishlist-to-bombers-20130323-2gmir.html#ixzz2OMsS3Y6C
The Tim Sheens dismissal is still causing ructions at Wests Tigers - his comments that Robbie Farah and Benji Marshall led to his dismissal are an issue. Marshall has taken up the matter with Sheens - Farah is choosing to ignore it, saying: ''That's the past''. What has been ignored is the Tigers' lack of results in recent years. Sheens did very well winning a comp in 2005 when they rode home on Marshall's brilliance - but since that time results have been scarce. Far worse than the lack of results is the questionable recruitment. The signing which has caused the most angst among the players was Adam Blair from the Storm. He was paid $550,000 - a hefty price for a forward - but worse, Bryce Gibbs and Andrew Fifita had to be let go and paid out so they could play at the Sharks. The turnaround means Blair in effect cost the Tigers about $800,000 a year. Sheens was his strongest advocate. Senior players didn't roll Sheens - they were asked their view but declined to get involved. Recruitment and results hurt Sheens in the end.
\
\
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/dank-took-sharks-wishlist-to-bombers-20130323-2gmir.html#ixzz2OMsS3Y6C