HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Fallah's 'rant' seems more like a personal defence of HBG & their actions than anything else. I don't know him, but I know some people that do- and they all say he's a very reasonable guy.

While what Fallah says doesn't resonate well with the pitchfork folk of December, it was really just a fairly passionate plea/defence of the group he is involved with- HBG- and what he feels is disrespect from fans- at least, that's how I read it.

Some of the stuff thrown AT HBG was just as passionate.
They are supposed to be the leaders of the club, it's their job to repair the disillusionment of the fans, not add to it.
 
They are supposed to be the leaders of the club, it's their job to repair the disillusionment of the fans, not add to it.
There are several ways of doing something. Maybe they felt softly-softly didn't work & decided to push back?

I don't know. It certainly feels like a passionate defence more than anything else.
 
Like I said- this has ZERO impact on Wests Tigers & fan fury is misguided.

This is a media attempt to get buy-in from a rabid fan pack. You WANT to be angry at HBG- so the paper found something irrelevant to stir you up. Pay rise or pay decrease for HBG board members will have zero impact on Wests Tigers is will completely be based on HBG performance in 2025.

If the overall results in 2025 for HBG aligned organisations were positive- it would make sense that a pay increase would happen.
As we keep being reminded, HBG owns Wests tigers football club... so its only fair we judge HBG based on their actions with the football club, right?

Who sacked the independent directors?
Who pushed out the ceo who brought the club back into the green?
Who made decisions that have impacted contract negotiations?

Whos asking for a payrise?

If you cant see the issue that fans of the wests tigers football club have with this, then you have your head up your backside.
 
As we keep being reminded, HBG owns Wests tigers football club... so its only fair we judge HBG based on their actions with the football club, right?

Who sacked the independent directors?
Who pushed out the ceo who brought the club back into the green?
Who made decisions that have impacted contract negotiations?

Whos asking for a payrise?

If you cant see the issue that fans of the wests tigers football club have with this, then you have your head up your backside.
What impact will this have on Wests Tigers that has you so worked up?
 
What impact will this have on Wests Tigers that has you so worked up?
Where did I say that the payrises had a direct impact on the football club?

Do you not find it laughable that such gross incompetence is being rewarded with significant payrises?

How you lot cannot connect the dots completely astounds me... at the same time, im not surprised at all.
 
Are they decreasing their funding? Don't HBG also fund other clubs? Haven't they increased their portfolio in the last 12 months, adding tasks to their resume?

It was never enough to begin with.

Yeah so, where should any extra funds go? To the football club or HBG boards members?

Show us you really care.
 
It feels more like gross incompetence to me.
I'm sure they don't think so.

Remember that they were being the target of a rally directed at them at the time. Rolling over & saying "you got me" sounds more like incompetence. This sounds more like someone trying to put their perspective on things.
 
Are they decreasing their funding? Don't HBG also fund other clubs? Haven't they increased their portfolio in the last 12 months, adding tasks to their resume?
Maybe they have too much on their plate.. a good indicator is PVL involvement

They should divest the nrl club and focus somewhere else...
 
I'm sure they don't think so.

Remember that they were being the target of a rally directed at them at the time. Rolling over & saying "you got me" sounds more like incompetence. This sounds more like someone trying to put their perspective on things.
The problem is they dont really think..

No one gives a rats about their perspective anymore, that ship has sailed.
 
Where did I say that the payrises had a direct impact on the football club?

Do you not find it laughable that such gross incompetence is being rewarded with significant payrises?

How you lot cannot connect the dots completely astounds me... at the same time, im not surprised at all.
Take off the Wests Tigers glasses for a second.

How did HBG go with the Leagues Club, Wests Ashfield, the new soccer side etc?

Their pay increase is NOT solely based on Wests Tigers (who had a better year for whatever reason).

If a company has 12 arms & the only failure was marginally on one arm- is the year a failure?
 
Maybe they have too much on their plate.. a good indicator is PVL involvement

They should divest the nrl club and focus somewhere else...
Apparently we had the best membership numbers & ran a profit, along with a better result on the field.

It doesn't look like we went backwards.

This year hasn't happened yet. If we go forward again- what happens?

The HBG pay rise is based on 2025 results, across all their spectrums, I would assume.
 
Take off the Wests Tigers glasses for a second.

How did HBG go with the Leagues Club, Wests Ashfield, the new soccer side etc?

Their pay increase is NOT solely based on Wests Tigers (who had a better year for whatever reason).

If a company has 12 arms & the only failure was marginally on one arm- is the year a failure?
The reason was richo..

But ok mate, you are making this argument so I will hear you out..

Come back in here with details of the arms of their business and the growth on each of them..

Lets see how much is actually a result of hard work and initiatives vs dependence on degenerate gamblers.

Don't side step this one.. present the actual details of the results .
 
It was never enough to begin with.

Yeah so, where should any extra funds go? To the football club or HBG boards members?

Show us you really care.
Find me a business board that doesn't increase wages each year after an addition to their portfolio.

This reads exactly like that, along with performance based increases.

Show me where HBG didn't perform at their board level.
 
Back
Top