HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Rusty also saved the club from ruin with his own personal cash, handing partial ownership to the members. Supported Richo to do it. He has a lot of credibility built up.

If you're going to try to provide a contrast, you need to find a better rebuke too.
This is what happens when you read a post, but don’t read the post it was responding to. Fridge Magnet cited Crowe - I responded ... follow the trail 👍
 

Attachments

  • FDADA152-2E04-4097-9B5B-50A2AD92ED81.jpeg
    FDADA152-2E04-4097-9B5B-50A2AD92ED81.jpeg
    214.7 KB · Views: 10
You can’t reason with these guys mate . They’re retired… so it’s like thier brain switched off the moment they walked out of the working world .
I know someone who once got a written warning for raising thier voice , when being yelled at . The lady said she felt intimidated …. She was 1000km away …..
you’d seriously get sacked for those posts at most companies . Fair or not… that’s the world we live in .
Who are you calling retired ?
 
Look at his Instagram page then you will see what stupid is. Or more like childish. He is a director of a multi million dollar business but acts like a 10 year old.
My question to you was what you categorise as an average footballer, not what he does on his Instagram page.
You do realise he is not a director of HBG.
 
Wests tigers fans will be going to leichardt this weekend.

Wests magpies fans will be going to Lidcombe.

If we want unity, we should all be going to the same stadium to watch both teams run around.

No matter what bs the club wants to spin you, this is mismanagement on their behalf. It should be a priority for them next year to address this issue. Its a good time to be doing this as there will be no games at leichardt, so the traditional magpie heads dont get their knickers in a knot.

For the betterment of the football club and unity, this means there will be less games at lidcombe. Try not to take it personally, but the club has to evolve and have a united front.
 
Wests tigers fans will be going to leichardt this weekend.

Wests magpies fans will be going to Lidcombe.

If we want unity, we should all be going to the same stadium to watch both teams run around.

No matter what bs the club wants to spin you, this is mismanagement on their behalf. It should be a priority for them next year to address this issue. Its a good time to be doing this as there will be no games at leichardt, so the traditional magpie heads dont get their knickers in a knot.

For the betterment of the football club and unity, this means there will be less games at lidcombe. Try not to take it personally, but the club has to evolve and have a united front.
There's probably a certain amount of 'requirement' to spread the games between the feeder clubs home grounds as much as anything else.

There should be more double feature games, for sure. But- the club directors have obligations to both Magpies & Balmain junior leagues & might also be obliged to play games at the homes of the feeder clubs as the year goes on too.

Maybe run a different version of the double feature- run the Ball or Matts game prior to the KOE at these grounds & give better value & make it more of a spectacle.

Maybe running the NRLW game prior to the Wests Tigers game becomes the double feature? If you are going to fund a women's team, you should promote it.
 
There's probably a certain amount of 'requirement' to spread the games between the feeder clubs home grounds as much as anything else.

There should be more double feature games, for sure. But- the club directors have obligations to both Magpies & Balmain junior leagues & might also be obliged to play games at the homes of the feeder clubs as the year goes on too.

Maybe run a different version of the double feature- run the Ball or Matts game prior to the KOE at these grounds & give better value & make it more of a spectacle.

Maybe running the NRLW game prior to the Wests Tigers game becomes the double feature? If you are going to fund a women's team, you should promote it.
The dragons are a joint venture and they manage to do it without issue.
 
I think factions who purport to support the club, trying desperately to make something out of very little, just to embarrass the club for their own political gain - is something not to be swept under the shag pile.
It's not us embarrassing the club, it's the Magpies Old Boys doing it for all to see and that of course includes the media.

The Old Boys are an endless source of headlines and click bait for the media and their readers.
 
There's probably a certain amount of 'requirement' to spread the games between the feeder clubs home grounds as much as anything else.

There should be more double feature games, for sure. But- the club directors have obligations to both Magpies & Balmain junior leagues & might also be obliged to play games at the homes of the feeder clubs as the year goes on too.

Maybe run a different version of the double feature- run the Ball or Matts game prior to the KOE at these grounds & give better value & make it more of a spectacle.

Maybe running the NRLW game prior to the Wests Tigers game becomes the double feature? If you are going to fund a women's team, you should promote it.
The club has provided two different answers to this issue:

SM advised ..." nswrl dictates the draw, clubs don't have a say in it directly.
Our preference has previously been noted for Lidcombe oval as our base and as such the nswrl implemented this. The nswrl draw was also released before the NRL announced its plans for a 6 man bench, so this breakdown in comms means the nswrl has shot itself in the foot a bit and some players will miss out on game time that the change to the 6 man bench was not forseen by NSWRL and they do all of the scheduling."

Ben in the Membership area provided this..."The costs of running double headers at CommBank Stadium make hosting NSW Cup matches unsustainable.
With the current changeroom set up at Leichhardt, running double headers is also not practical but with the new facilities after the development you should see more hosted here.
We work with our NSW Cup team to identify matches for double headers and do have some pencilled in this year, however, there is a financial incentive to host games at Lidcombe Oval as it can generate revenue from Ticketing, Parking and Canteen sales."

I expect that SM has given the political answer that absolves WT of any issue with the setup; whereas Ben has provided a down in the weeds "financial" reasoning. I get it for CommBank but I don't believe that having the games at Lidcombe generate that much income that it is a game changer for the club. I highly suspect there is a push from WM to have their side play at Lidcombe as there is no justification not to play at Leichardt and Cambo form a cost perspective. If the rugby and women's soccer can play at Leichardt - no need to bullshit about the state of the dressing sheds!

The truth is out there - but I think what the club is stating is only part of the story.
 
The club has provided two different answers to this issue:

SM advised ..." nswrl dictates the draw, clubs don't have a say in it directly.
Our preference has previously been noted for Lidcombe oval as our base and as such the nswrl implemented this. The nswrl draw was also released before the NRL announced its plans for a 6 man bench, so this breakdown in comms means the nswrl has shot itself in the foot a bit and some players will miss out on game time that the change to the 6 man bench was not forseen by NSWRL and they do all of the scheduling."

Ben in the Membership area provided this..."The costs of running double headers at CommBank Stadium make hosting NSW Cup matches unsustainable.
With the current changeroom set up at Leichhardt, running double headers is also not practical but with the new facilities after the development you should see more hosted here.
We work with our NSW Cup team to identify matches for double headers and do have some pencilled in this year, however, there is a financial incentive to host games at Lidcombe Oval as it can generate revenue from Ticketing, Parking and Canteen sales."

I expect that SM has given the political answer that absolves WT of any issue with the setup; whereas Ben has provided a down in the weeds "financial" reasoning. I get it for CommBank but I don't believe that having the games at Lidcombe generate that much income that it is a game changer for the club. I highly suspect there is a push from WM to have their side play at Lidcombe as there is no justification not to play at Leichardt and Cambo form a cost perspective. If the rugby and women's soccer can play at Leichardt - no need to bullshit about the state of the dressing sheds!

The truth is out there - but I think what the club is stating is only part of the story.
If the dragons are doing it now, it says to me its a wests tigers problem, not a nswrl problem. SM the DJ spinning the decks already.
 
This is what happens when you read a post, but don’t read the post it was responding to. Fridge Magnet cited Crowe - I responded ... follow the trail 👍
Oh no, I did read that. Just wanted to provide some more differentiation for Crowe on why he may not get barraged like Fallah. He also hasn't posted racist meme's as far as I know...
 
Magpies pushed for a $3m upgrade of Lidcombe and got it....so itd be a bit rude of them not to use it.
The 20 year lease also wont see anything change anytime soon imo
 
Magpies pushed for a $3m upgrade of Lidcombe and got it....so itd be a bit rude of them not to use it.
The 20 year lease also wont see anything change anytime soon imo
Is there a reason they couldnt play out of Concord where the centre of excellence is? Other than nostalgia and the upgrade above?
 
Magpies pushed for a $3m upgrade of Lidcombe and got it....so itd be a bit rude of them not to use it.
The 20 year lease also wont see anything change anytime soon imo

Not that it bothers me where Ressies plays at all, I do wonder why?

- Haven't the magpies been whinging for 27 Seasons that the Wests Tigers don't
support the South West / Play enough games in the South West?

As soon as they get the chance,
They pull the Senior Footy team they fought so hard for - back from Cambo to the Inner West?
They really are 'special' those WA folk!
 
I think they may be if they cause serious damage to someones image.
Go and read the defamation act. Opinion is not defamation. Getting backlash for some action you have taken is not defamation.

My opinion is he is an idiot for posting it. As a debenture holder in the ownership group, my preference is he acts in a professional manner both privately and publicly, but publicly is my main concern. My or others opinions on his actions is not defamation.

You yourself have offered plenty of character assessments of me. That is your opinion which you are not only entitled to, but you are thankfully protected by law even though I may disagree or feel it hurts my reputation.

If, however, you accuse me of a crime or some wrong doing that is factually untrue, then that could be deemed defamation.

The kangaroo court defamation lawyers on here running cover for everything these bozos do need to wake up to themselves.
 

Members online

Back
Top