Hindmarsh's Opinion

@Bismark said:
So what though? He doesn't respect the Tigers, good for him.

He is still an excellent player, because he has got an opinion we don't like shouldn't really call for comments like "your fat and should retire". Bit excessive.

I'm sure a whole heap of players wouldn't rate the Tigers as winning the premiership, ffs we've only really had 2 strong wins in the last 2 weeks. Chillax?

I never rated Hindmarsh. He gets 50 tackles, 48 of them 3rd man in, and his 10 hitups for 42 metres is just pathetic. (may have exaggerated).
 
@Black Orange White said:
@Bismark said:
So what though? He doesn't respect the Tigers, good for him.

He is still an excellent player, because he has got an opinion we don't like shouldn't really call for comments like "your fat and should retire". Bit excessive.

I'm sure a whole heap of players wouldn't rate the Tigers as winning the premiership, ffs we've only really had 2 strong wins in the last 2 weeks. Chillax?

I never rated Hindmarsh. **He gets 50 tackles, 48 of them 3rd man in, and his 10 hitups for 42 metres is just pathetic.** (may have exaggerated).

I know another player like that. I believe he wears the #9 at the Bulldogs…
 
@Long Distance Tiger said:
Who cares what he thinks. All I'm interested in is the scoreboard and that was a very pretty sight. Check this out: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/tigers-on-a-mission-show-their-might-against-fiery-brilliant-eels-20100822-13axb.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

Nice to read an article crediting the tigers for the win. Most articles I have read have only concentrated on the fact parra were coming home strong, and that Burt missed the goal to level the scores.
 
@VX225 said:
@Long Distance Tiger said:
Who cares what he thinks. All I'm interested in is the scoreboard and that was a very pretty sight. Check this out: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/tigers-on-a-mission-show-their-might-against-fiery-brilliant-eels-20100822-13axb.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

Nice to read an article crediting the tigers for the win. Most articles I have read have only concentrated on the fact parra were coming home strong, and that Burt missed the goal to level the scores.

It's a good read from Gould..love him or hate him he can read the game better than most. He pinpoints the extra defensive load on Mateo as a key to the win which I think is pretty spot on, their second phase play is always the danger with Parra and we shut them down beautifully I thought.
 
He has always had an agenda against the Tigers for some reason. I remember the episode of NRL on Fox shortly after we won the 2005 grand final they asked him what his opinion of the game was and he said something along the lines of I didn't watch it, I heard it was boring anway.
 
Fair enough (in relation to his comments on the Tigers). He's entitled to his opinion, but he should keep his mouth shut when it comes to Origin football. He showed in game 2 that he is clearly not up to the intensity of Origin, Farah rips all over Ennis, it doesn't take a brain surgeon to work out that one.
 
to be honest it seems to be how allot of other team supporters feel towards the tigers and how the media think towards us too. I like that we slip under the radar…
it doesn't bother me what he thinks we wouldnt make the starting side in the tigers anyway, he had a great start to his career and really hasn't been at that level again for almost 5yrs now.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Black Orange White said:
@Bismark said:
So what though? He doesn't respect the Tigers, good for him.

He is still an excellent player, because he has got an opinion we don't like shouldn't really call for comments like "your fat and should retire". Bit excessive.

I'm sure a whole heap of players wouldn't rate the Tigers as winning the premiership, ffs we've only really had 2 strong wins in the last 2 weeks. Chillax?

I never rated Hindmarsh. **He gets 50 tackles, 48 of them 3rd man in, and his 10 hitups for 42 metres is just pathetic.** (may have exaggerated).

I know another player like that. I believe he wears the #9 at the Bulldogs…

That is just absurd…..

..Ennis has never gotten close to 50 tackles in any way shape or form.
 
@Thaiger14 said:
He has always had an agenda against the Tigers for some reason. I remember the episode of NRL on Fox shortly after we won the 2005 grand final they asked him what his opinion of the game was and he said something along the lines of I didn't watch it, I heard it was boring anway.

I remember that and hought what a spoilt brat. Wasnt our fault that his side crapped themselves and were flogged in the Major semi by the team we flogged twice in that years finals campaign :laughing:
 
Back
Top