Humble to play halfback

joe_s_magpies

New member
From twitter:

@Wests_Tigers: The scoop for the week is that Tom Humble has been named as halfback and Lote Tuqiri will make his return from injury!
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Haha so the fall guy this week is Miller, last week it was Moors.

You really can't make this shit up!
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Absolutely Simon, miller offers nothing in any of the chances he gets, and don't say miller didnt get a long go at 7, he played more minutes there than humble and humble offered much more
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Oh wow I don't believe it! I called for this after the Manly game, Sheens must've listened to me :laughing:
 
Is Humble the long term solution to our halfback problems? Well no cause he's a 5/8

Miller is a halfback who is 19 and potentially the future of the Wests Tigers club

Give him half a season to prove he has it
 
@tigerlogic said:
Hybrid wot do u call miller? He's f#*^+ng hopeless, humble good with the ball
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

A natural halfback who is still playing in the 20s.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
Humble is a fill in, depth player at best.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

1000% spot on. He tries hard, but he's a depth player at best. He couldn't crack it at Parra even with some very ordinary players ahead of him. He tries hard and deserves to play some games off the bench, but that's it.
 
@cnx_tigers said:
@hybrid_tiger said:
Humble is a fill in, depth player at best.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

1000% spot on. He tries hard, but he's a depth player at best. He couldn't crack it at Parra even with some very ordinary players ahead of him. He tries hard and deserves to play some games off the bench, but that's it.

I think he's a very handy bench utility. Can play fullback, halves and hooker if need be.

But as a starter or long term solution to one position, no way in the world.

At fullback he is average under the high ball.
In the halves he has little to no kicking game.
At hooker he doesn't have the motor to do the defensive work required.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
I actually thought we looked most dangerous when humble was in half. Obviously a few different factors could have contributed to that - but never the less I will give him the benefit of the doubt.

And yes, he threw that ball over the sideline - but it was the right idea - the kind of idea I am yet to see miller deliver.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Anyone calling miller hopless after last night is an idiot.Was coached not to play at first reciever(as it seems moltzen was aswell)wasnt the main kicking option and on top of that the team had no Possession. Pick a half back and stay with it,and let them play the role properly and take some pressure off benji(and the majority off the kicking dutys please)

Miller is young and maybe not going to be a first grade star but at the moment he hasnt been given a chance to show what he has.
 
@Centaur said:
I actually thought we looked most dangerous when humble was in half. Obviously a few different factors could have contributed to that - but never the less I will give him the benefit of the doubt.

And yes, he threw that ball over the sideline - but it was the right idea - the kind of idea I am yet to see miller deliver.

I think it is a good option - Humble has looked more dangerous that Miller has.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top