Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@scarcev said:Fulton (29yo, 90 odd games) at the moment but in a year or so I think Flanagan is the future (23yo, 20 odd games EPL and NRL). To get them in the same lineup I reckon one of them playing that 17 role would be good for the back we waste on there every week.
@Sabre said:i really don't understand why we can't have both
@crouching_tiger said:What sort of question is that??
It's like comparing Andrew Johns to Robert Lui..
@Student of the game said:Who is the better player?
IMHO it is a real tough one.
Your thoughts….....
@Colonel said:The answer is Simon Dwyer…
I'm not sure there's room for either Flanagan or Fulton in a full strength team (knowing that Sheens will always have a back on the bench, ridiculous as I think it is):
8\. Bryce Gibbs
9\. Robbie Farah
10\. Keith Galloway
11\. Gareth Ellis
12\. Todd Payten
13\. Chris Heighington
14\. Andrew Fafita
15\. Junior Moors
16\. Simon Dwyer
17\. Blake Ayshford
@Tiger Watto said:I think it will be between Dwyer or Flanagan? They both offer a different approach to Attack and Defence. This is a hard one…
Fulton has got to be in the 17, as he can play ever position except Prop and Fullback.
@bbobb said:Fulton versus Flanagan - choice is easy. Fulton
1) Can make 40+ tackles in a game
2) Is the best-on-one tackler in the side
3) Has proven utility value
4) Is a much better ball player then Flanagan
5) Can run a good angle and hit a hole.
Don't get me wrong - I think Flanagan goes well however in my opinion he tries to play a brand of bash and barge football which isn't suited to his frame and while I don't mean to be overly critical of one incident, I doubt Fulton would have missed Luke Lewis in the Penrith game.
Fulton is essential as his ruck defence is excellent and will be relied upon in semi-final type football