**Live game thread** Us vs the Panthers

@hobbo2803 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@hobbo2803 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
They haven't had to pay players out in the past. I.e Galloway, Gibbs Heigno etc. Why is this any different?

Galloway , Gibbs & Heigno were all wanted by other clubs .
Who would take lawrence ??

Thanks for explaining why there are demands to pay Robbie out.

Taylor made it personal with Farah with his lack of cohesion BS story , hence the call to pay Farah out , instead of shafting him playing reserve grade …big difference !

Not really. If it is personal, what proof is there that it's JT's doing, especially with Farah's recent history. Plus Farah is reportedly out of favour with those above JT too. If Farah was the cause of it being personal, why should the club feel obliged to pay him out?
 
So far it's a case of Moses can't play if Farrah is on the park and now it appears from some comments he can't play with Brooks on the field. Who else should we pick or not pick so he can play ? Be careful what you wish for. Creating another monster ?
 
@Tiger on the hill said:
So far it's a case of Moses can't play if Farrah is on the park and now it appears from some comments he can't play with Brooks on the field. Who else should we pick or not pick so he can play ? Be careful what you wish for. Creating another monster ?

Has Moses said that he can't play with his good friend of many years. They have not had any problems all through the lower grades.
Maybe this fairy story just fits your agenda. Let's just make it up eh!

I wouldn't be judging halves performance on last nights game. The forwards were totally dominated - no line speed, no aggression etc. We were very lucky they played as well as they did. He played like a champion - what did you want him to do - beat Penriff by himself?
 
@hobbo2803 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@foreveratiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
He's here for another 3 years. Get use to it.

His not if the next Coach don't want him.

He has a contract though. The club has no right to move him on. Or is everyone only going to use that argument for one player?

Pay him out , he'll go .
Lawrence should of retired on the 28/3/2011

If he doesn't want to go, of course the same would apply to him.
 
@TIGER said:
Ok let's sort out our problems right now. As bad as Rankin was tonight at the back it's not his fault, he's not a fullback. Those kicks he had to take were difficult, Teddy would of put a few down himself I dare say.
IMO we need to replace

Halatau (obviously)
Lovett
Brooks
Kevie
Grant

Controversial?

Those players you mention are keepers. It's not controversial. It is stupid.
 
@Russell said:
@Tiger on the hill said:
So far it's a case of Moses can't play if Farrah is on the park and now it appears from some comments he can't play with Brooks on the field. Who else should we pick or not pick so he can play ? Be careful what you wish for. Creating another monster ?

Has Moses said that he can't play with his good friend of many years. They have not had any problems all through the lower grades.
Maybe this fairy story just fits your agenda. Let's just make it up eh!

I wouldn't be judging halves performance on last nights game. The forwards were totally dominated - no line speed, no aggression etc. We were very lucky they played as well as they did. He played like a champion - what did you want him to do - beat Penriff by himself?

Brooks best has been without Moses and the reverse seems to be fairly accurate as well. Considering the number of first grade games you would think that they would be able to play a lot better together. Maybe they are trying to compete with each other, I'm not sure, but this subject came up earlier in the season , and, I think, late last year
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top