anderson_silva
New member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2009
- Messages
- 637
humphreys is gonna look like a fool when they do announce lote as a WT recruit. especially after he plays union
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
@anderson silva said:humphreys is gonna look like a fool when they do announce lote as a WT recruit. especially after he plays union
@anderson silva said:humphreys is gonna look like a fool when they do announce lote as a WT recruit. especially after he plays union
@Geo. said:@anderson silva said:humphreys is gonna look like a fool when they do announce lote as a WT recruit. especially after he plays union
Can't agree with that at all…..Humphreys has been right in the middle dealing all along with Lortay's lack of commitment as well as Gallop and his croonies at the NRL.........Shortly after meeting Gallop last week....... Gallop was quoted in the Press for first time saying Lote was clear to return to the NRL.......after any Union commitments were finished.........
If anything in all this Humphreys has proved to me that he is cool under pressure......... very measured in what he says....determined to get results...far from looking like a fool ..When he decides the right time to announce any futher signings it will be done on his terms.....not the media or the fans.........
He has been very impressive for mine for a man only 3 months into a job where 2010 shapes as the clubs most important season to date.......
@anderson silva said:i agree hes done a great job with this whole saga, but the statement he released yesterday is just setting him up to look like a fool in 3 months when lote returns from union with a contract that has him being in the top 3 highest paid players at the club.
@bonstonker said:@anderson silva said:i agree hes done a great job with this whole saga, but the statement he released yesterday is just setting him up to look like a fool in 3 months when lote returns from union with a contract that has him being in the top 3 highest paid players at the club.
and if the leaks would have kept their mouth shut ,he wouldn't need to release a statement at all.
there is a process that has to appear like it has been followed.
while you obviously don't understand this,this is the way it is from the stance gallop has taken.
simply sit back and allow this to follow its course on the timing of each event was all that was required.
this is what we will give you.
go sign with rugby and be back by this date.
once you have signed with rugby you can then sign our contract.
done,no worries.
but once loose lips are involved we have our ceo having to make statements that were not needed to be made if a very simple plan was followed.
@anderson silva said:@bonstonker said:@anderson silva said:i agree hes done a great job with this whole saga, but the statement he released yesterday is just setting him up to look like a fool in 3 months when lote returns from union with a contract that has him being in the top 3 highest paid players at the club.
and if the leaks would have kept their mouth shut ,he wouldn't need to release a statement at all.
there is a process that has to appear like it has been followed.
while you obviously don't understand this,this is the way it is from the stance gallop has taken.
simply sit back and allow this to follow its course on the timing of each event was all that was required.
this is what we will give you.
go sign with rugby and be back by this date.
once you have signed with rugby you can then sign our contract.
done,no worries.
but once loose lips are involved we have our ceo having to make statements that were not needed to be made if a very simple plan was followed.
i hope you arent having a subtle dig at me bon. if you are referring to me as loose lips, you didnt seem to mind them when you PM'd me asking what was going on in this whole lote thing didnt you.
@anderson silva said:the part where i was refering to him looking foolish was when he said if lote choses to play union there is no guarentee he will have a contract waiting for him when he returns, which you and i both know geo to be an untrue statement from humphreys.
i agree hes done a great job with this whole saga, but the statement he released yesterday is just setting him up to look like a fool in 3 months when lote returns from union with a contract that has him being in the top 3 highest paid players at the club.
now thats not bad considering he has "no guarentee of a contract with the tigers" isnt it
@anderson silva said:you wouldnt get an apology from me even if i was wrong, i know 98% of people on here were grateful for my info just you and a couple others who have a problem for some reason, and although my source was pissed that i leaked the info, i had already done it and it couldnt be taken it back, he just asked in future that i dont publicise any other signings or inside info.
anyway ill let people know via PM's from now on and you and other haters can wait weeks after for the papers to "break" a story.
@innsaneink said:@anderson silva said:the part where i was refering to him looking foolish was when he said if lote choses to play union there is no guarentee he will have a contract waiting for him when he returns, which you and i both know geo to be an untrue statement from humphreys.
i agree hes done a great job with this whole saga, but the statement he released yesterday is just setting him up to look like a fool in 3 months when lote returns from union with a contract that has him being in the top 3 highest paid players at the club.
now thats not bad considering he has "no guarentee of a contract with the tigers" isnt it
Humphreys says theres no guarantee….and then theres some faceless internet name whos just been exposed as a liar, saying there is. You seem to be doing your darndest to convince us.
You said weeks back you were done posting in this thread, you said you were only here to provide info and then said something along the lines of "Ask fainty who I said this in a PM to" after the fact when this latest story broke yesterday, in a need to verify this....you said a week ago you ''had info'' - ''but I'm not saying anything", and when asked why come back with "I didnt want to create mayhem" which was all saying something like that was going to do...and because I queried you on that for some reason I'm having my posts moderated and have been for a week.
For someone who said about 10 days back youre done posting here...well gee, it really looks like it...your prerogative though.
I dont know what the need is to try and convince people with an opposing POV like 'tigertimes' a page back.
I also find it strange you can seem to need to reply to everything, yet when you get accused of lying you calmly let that slide.
anyway ill let people know via PM's from now on and you and other haters can wait weeks after for the papers to "break" a story.
Yep...you said this a week ago.
I guess this post will see me banned.
@anderson silva said:anyway ill let people know via PM's from now on and you and other haters can wait weeks after for the papers to "break" a story.