rihannafan1
Well-known member
Brooks is a capable player but not the one our team needs right now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tiger-tragic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451756) said:He's a 6. Not a 7
@harvey said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451791) said:I think that we are nuts to let him go before next year.
I listed some of the crap halves in the NRL earlier. He is not great, but he is not the worst.
Without him we would be running with Hastings & Doueihi as the halves **who are both unproven** and the same crap supporting cast & gameplan. I would be interested in seeing what Sheens can do to his game
@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451792) said:@tiger-tragic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451756) said:He's a 6. Not a 7
Is he ? The problem I have with Brooks is that he doesn't step up enough. Let's be honest but Doueihi didn't yesterday either.
We need some gun players. Hastings might be that guy.
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451814) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451792) said:@tiger-tragic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451756) said:He's a 6. Not a 7
Is he ? The problem I have with Brooks is that he doesn't step up enough. Let's be honest but Doueihi didn't yesterday either.
We need some gun players. Hastings might be that guy.
Hastings may find things quite a bit different in the NRL when the speed of the game is faster and the big men who are faster than him are targeting him in defence. Hastings is in his mid 20s and never held down an NRL halves' position. Even bad boy halves are retained if they are good.
@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451817) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451814) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451792) said:@tiger-tragic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451756) said:He's a 6. Not a 7
Is he ? The problem I have with Brooks is that he doesn't step up enough. Let's be honest but Doueihi didn't yesterday either.
We need some gun players. Hastings might be that guy.
Hastings may find things quite a bit different in the NRL when the speed of the game is faster and the big men who are faster than him are targeting him in defence. Hastings is in his mid 20s and never held down an NRL halves' position. Even bad boy halves are retained if they are good.
If he isn't that guy then it's going to be another long season.
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451823) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451817) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451814) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451792) said:@tiger-tragic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451756) said:He's a 6. Not a 7
Is he ? The problem I have with Brooks is that he doesn't step up enough. Let's be honest but Doueihi didn't yesterday either.
We need some gun players. Hastings might be that guy.
Hastings may find things quite a bit different in the NRL when the speed of the game is faster and the big men who are faster than him are targeting him in defence. Hastings is in his mid 20s and never held down an NRL halves' position. Even bad boy halves are retained if they are good.
If he isn't that guy then it's going to be another long season.
We should have put in a significant bid for Brayden Trindall. When he was off contract I thought he was the player we should have chased, not Hastings.
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451814) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451792) said:@tiger-tragic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451756) said:He's a 6. Not a 7
Is he ? The problem I have with Brooks is that he doesn't step up enough. Let's be honest but Doueihi didn't yesterday either.
We need some gun players. Hastings might be that guy.
Hastings may find things quite a bit different in the NRL when the speed of the game is faster and the big men who are faster than him are targeting him in defence. Hastings is in his mid 20s and never held down an NRL halves' position. Even bad boy halves are retained if they are good.
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451741) said:@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451617) said:@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451599) said:@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451526) said:@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451522) said:People can wish all they like, he’s not going anywhere. The club is already paying out half of Mbye’s contract this year. They won’t pay out half of Brooks on top of that.
Yup, even if they want him gone they'll have to pay majority of his contract
Would be well worth it to get rid of the anchor.
Easy to say on a forum when you already dislike him. Different story when you are the one actually balancing the cap.
You think?
There are people actually paid big money to balance our cap and get rid of deadwood like Brooks.
About time they stepped up.
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451808) said:@harvey said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451791) said:I think that we are nuts to let him go before next year.
I listed some of the crap halves in the NRL earlier. He is not great, but he is not the worst.
Without him we would be running with Hastings & Doueihi as the halves **who are both unproven** and the same crap supporting cast & gameplan. I would be interested in seeing what Sheens can do to his game
So you would rather keep a proven dud than try something different?
If Brooks is as wonderful as some think then other clubs should be lining up to sign him and we wont need to take a big $$$ hit to get rid of him.
@tigerap said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451855) said:The reason our paper thin defence was that yesterday is down to two reasons:
1) our halves did not control the game… Very poor game management by both AD and Brooks, no repeat sets, poor 5th set options and 2) our unforced errors, which is a common occurrence
Address the above two and with our forwards rolling we win most games…
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451886) said:@harvey said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451876) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451871) said:Why do we hang onto the shit players forever ?
Brooks has always been average at best so why do they keep extending him ..
Same goes for nofoalooza..
both are crap , both have never made the semis and both have never made Origin ..
This club is shit … it’ll take another 10 years to turn this crap around ..
mark my words !
Because we can't sign replacements. Let them go and you end up with a team full of Tuki's
Reports all over the place this morning that Brooks is being shopped to other clubs by his manager.
Maybe there are things going on behind the scenes.
Hope Nofo is also the radar.
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451910) said:@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451906) said:@batboy said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451899) said:@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451886) said:@harvey said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451876) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451871) said:Why do we hang onto the shit players forever ?
Brooks has always been average at best so why do they keep extending him ..
Same goes for nofoalooza..
both are crap , both have never made the semis and both have never made Origin ..
This club is shit … it’ll take another 10 years to turn this crap around ..
mark my words !
Because we can't sign replacements. Let them go and you end up with a team full of Tuki's
Reports all over the place this morning that Brooks is being shopped to other clubs by his manager.
Maybe there are things going on behind the scenes.
Hope Nofo is also the radar.
No middles, No Second Rowers, No Centres, No Fullback, No strike out Wide...
Lets sack the halfback!!
F This Club!!
The club is a mess, but apparently booting the halfback and winger will turn the whole club around.
It’s a start
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451918) said:@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451910) said:@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451906) said:@batboy said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451899) said:@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451886) said:@harvey said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451876) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1451871) said:Why do we hang onto the shit players forever ?
Brooks has always been average at best so why do they keep extending him ..
Same goes for nofoalooza..
both are crap , both have never made the semis and both have never made Origin ..
This club is shit … it’ll take another 10 years to turn this crap around ..
mark my words !
Because we can't sign replacements. Let them go and you end up with a team full of Tuki's
Reports all over the place this morning that Brooks is being shopped to other clubs by his manager.
Maybe there are things going on behind the scenes.
Hope Nofo is also the radar.
No middles, No Second Rowers, No Centres, No Fullback, No strike out Wide...
Lets sack the halfback!!
F This Club!!
The club is a mess, but apparently booting the halfback and winger will turn the whole club around.
It’s a start
Paying over a million dollars on contracts for players at other clubs. Yeah, nah