Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496248) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496236) said:
There is a political reason explaining why Brooks won our player of the Year award for 2021 that hasn’t presented itself yet.

And people still fool themselves into believing he won’t play 7

Don't confuse desire and what SHOULD happen with people fooling themselves.

Unfortunately it's highly likely Brooks will be 7. He doesn't deserve to, and it is to the detriment of the entire organisation, but it will happen because of non performance related reasons. Just as Brooks winning the coach voted Player of the year award was on non performance related reasons
 
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496255) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496248) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496236) said:
There is a political reason explaining why Brooks won our player of the Year award for 2021 that hasn’t presented itself yet.

And people still fool themselves into believing he won’t play 7

Don't confuse desire and what SHOULD happen with people fooling themselves.

Unfortunately it's highly likely Brooks will be 7. He doesn't deserve to, and it is to the detriment of the entire organisation, but it will happen because of non performance related reasons. Just as Brooks winning the coach voted Player of the year award was on non performance related reasons

What are those non-performance related reasons? What political reason?
 
@twentyforty said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496264) said:
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496255) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496248) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496236) said:
There is a political reason explaining why Brooks won our player of the Year award for 2021 that hasn’t presented itself yet.

And people still fool themselves into believing he won’t play 7

Don't confuse desire and what SHOULD happen with people fooling themselves.

Unfortunately it's highly likely Brooks will be 7. He doesn't deserve to, and it is to the detriment of the entire organisation, but it will happen because of non performance related reasons. Just as Brooks winning the coach voted Player of the year award was on non performance related reasons

What are those non-performance related reasons? What political reason?

Pretty sure we’d all like that to be made public.
 
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496266) said:
@twentyforty said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496264) said:
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496255) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496248) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496236) said:
There is a political reason explaining why Brooks won our player of the Year award for 2021 that hasn’t presented itself yet.

And people still fool themselves into believing he won’t play 7

Don't confuse desire and what SHOULD happen with people fooling themselves.

Unfortunately it's highly likely Brooks will be 7. He doesn't deserve to, and it is to the detriment of the entire organisation, but it will happen because of non performance related reasons. Just as Brooks winning the coach voted Player of the year award was on non performance related reasons

What are those non-performance related reasons? What political reason?

Pretty sure we’d all like that to be made public.

I’m sure a club statement is imminent.
 
Every time i see this thread pop up I think, maybe this is the fabled punt day.
 
The only halve I'd currently keep is Douehi ...and that would be potential based ...Brooks is far too inconsistent .....Hastings is going to be a car crash .....and unless the 18th man is cleaning footballs because of Covid Jock Madden is not the answer

Anyone who thinks we just needs centres and 2nd rowers ...needs to spend time at their closest rehab centre
 
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495759) said:
Stop spamming the thread up or I'll close it thanks.

Hey Dan

You can't really win when you post at the moment ...you post the truth ...you are a negative nelly ....you joke around a little and you earn the ire of the Mods

Pretty hard when everytime you jump on here and the club is allegedly pushing a youth policy and yet trying to sign some of the oldest players in the comp or thinks profits come before anything else ...

Things are at the worst levels yet at the club ....and I am not sure if I speak for others on here ....but talking solely about how unbelievably incompotent these tools are makes you want to smash everything on the computer desk or when watching them play throw the remote through the TV ...or mocking how bad they actually are ....throw in what you blokes have gone through the last few months .....

I understand your point and views ( and the other Mods ) but I reckon a bit of leeway might be the answer .....

Just my two bob's worth ....
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496380) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495759) said:
Stop spamming the thread up or I'll close it thanks.

Hey Dan

You can't really win when you post at the moment ...you post the truth ...you are a negative nelly ....you joke around a little and you earn the ire of the Mods

Pretty hard when everytime you jump on here and the club is allegedly pushing a youth policy and yet trying to sign some of the oldest players in the comp or thinks profits come before anything else ...

Things are at the worst levels yet at the club ....and I am not sure if I speak for others on here ....but talking solely about how unbelievably incompotent these tools are makes you want to smash everything on the computer desk or when watching them play throw the remote through the TV ...or mocking how bad they actually are ....throw in what you blokes have gone through the last few months .....

I understand your point and views ( and the other Mods ) but I reckon a bit of leeway might be the answer .....

Just my two bob's worth ....

@happy_tiger banned?
 
@pj said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496382) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496380) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495759) said:
Stop spamming the thread up or I'll close it thanks.

Hey Dan

You can't really win when you post at the moment ...you post the truth ...you are a negative nelly ....you joke around a little and you earn the ire of the Mods

Pretty hard when everytime you jump on here and the club is allegedly pushing a youth policy and yet trying to sign some of the oldest players in the comp or thinks profits come before anything else ...

Things are at the worst levels yet at the club ....and I am not sure if I speak for others on here ....but talking solely about how unbelievably incompotent these tools are makes you want to smash everything on the computer desk or when watching them play throw the remote through the TV ...or mocking how bad they actually are ....throw in what you blokes have gone through the last few months .....

I understand your point and views ( and the other Mods ) but I reckon a bit of leeway might be the answer .....

Just my two bob's worth ....

@happy_tiger banned?

No doubt, with all posts deleted.
 
@pj said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496382) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496380) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495759) said:
Stop spamming the thread up or I'll close it thanks.

Hey Dan

You can't really win when you post at the moment ...you post the truth ...you are a negative nelly ....you joke around a little and you earn the ire of the Mods

Pretty hard when everytime you jump on here and the club is allegedly pushing a youth policy and yet trying to sign some of the oldest players in the comp or thinks profits come before anything else ...

Things are at the worst levels yet at the club ....and I am not sure if I speak for others on here ....but talking solely about how unbelievably incompotent these tools are makes you want to smash everything on the computer desk or when watching them play throw the remote through the TV ...or mocking how bad they actually are ....throw in what you blokes have gone through the last few months .....

I understand your point and views ( and the other Mods ) but I reckon a bit of leeway might be the answer .....

Just my two bob's worth ....

@happy_tiger banned?

Getting banned is a bit like like getting dropped from the NRL to the KOE side at the WT's ...pheww ..... dodged this upcoming mess for a week
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496375) said:
The only halve I'd currently keep is Douehi ...and that would be potential based ...Brooks is far too inconsistent .....Hastings is going to be a car crash .....and unless the 18th man is cleaning footballs because of Covid Jock Madden is not the answer

Anyone who thinks we just needs centres and 2nd rowers ...needs to spend time at their closest rehab centre

This post needs to be stickied and preserved.
 
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496390) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496375) said:
The only halve I'd currently keep is Douehi ...and that would be potential based ...Brooks is far too inconsistent .....Hastings is going to be a car crash .....and unless the 18th man is cleaning footballs because of Covid Jock Madden is not the answer

Anyone who thinks we just needs centres and 2nd rowers ...needs to spend time at their closest rehab centre

This post needs to be stickied and preserved.

?
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496380) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495759) said:
Stop spamming the thread up or I'll close it thanks.

Hey Dan

You can't really win when you post at the moment ...you post the truth ...you are a negative nelly ....you joke around a little and you earn the ire of the Mods

Pretty hard when everytime you jump on here and the club is allegedly pushing a youth policy and yet trying to sign some of the oldest players in the comp or thinks profits come before anything else ...

Things are at the worst levels yet at the club ....and I am not sure if I speak for others on here ....but talking solely about how unbelievably incompotent these tools are makes you want to smash everything on the computer desk or when watching them play throw the remote through the TV ...or mocking how bad they actually are ....throw in what you blokes have gone through the last few months .....

I understand your point and views ( and the other Mods ) but I reckon a bit of leeway might be the answer .....

Just my two bob's worth ....

No comment on the moderation side of things....


However the youth policy push we've been sold... then letting go some serious talent is mind boggling.

Makes no sense.
Pascoe said via emails with me we're wanting to be a built not bought club and bring our talent through then we lose Hill, Ogden and Sykes.

Arguably 3 of the best talents coming through our grade in some time.... pretty weak effort by those involved.
 
@pascoes_barber said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496381) said:
Footy discussion: Serious business.

Its pathetic huh.

Thank god Kul took away the perma ban from some.
 
@pj said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496382) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496380) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495759) said:
Stop spamming the thread up or I'll close it thanks.

Hey Dan

You can't really win when you post at the moment ...you post the truth ...you are a negative nelly ....you joke around a little and you earn the ire of the Mods

Pretty hard when everytime you jump on here and the club is allegedly pushing a youth policy and yet trying to sign some of the oldest players in the comp or thinks profits come before anything else ...

Things are at the worst levels yet at the club ....and I am not sure if I speak for others on here ....but talking solely about how unbelievably incompotent these tools are makes you want to smash everything on the computer desk or when watching them play throw the remote through the TV ...or mocking how bad they actually are ....throw in what you blokes have gone through the last few months .....

I understand your point and views ( and the other Mods ) but I reckon a bit of leeway might be the answer .....

Just my two bob's worth ....

@happy_tiger banned?

![1B1B7F41-DBD7-41DC-BE6F-64234E44B2EE.png](/assets/uploads/files/1634868423633-1b1b7f41-dbd7-41dc-be6f-64234e44b2ee.png)
 
Im no Brooks supporter, in fact I think he should probably go to the ESL where he could do very very well. But, 435 pages on him is surely enough, there are a dozen others who shouldn't escape the wrath. So lets start alphabetically,Ok: Brooks , ..that didn't work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top