Mayor to bare teeth if Tigers move away

innsaneink

Well-known member
Mayor to bare teeth if Tigers move away
>
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/mayor-to-bare-teeth-if-tigers-move-away-20130720-2qb1u.html#ixzz2Zd9NQGSK
\
\
The mayor of Leichhardt will seek crisis talks with Tigers officials if rumours of the club's move away from its ''spiritual home'' at Leichhardt Oval materialise.
>
Darcy Byrne said he had received a ''rock solid commitment'' from chief executive Steve Humphreys early this year that the team would keep at least four games a season at the suburban ground. But Humphreys is no longer in charge, replaced by Grant Mayer.
>
There is talk that Friday night's loss to the Warriors may not be only Benji Marshall's last game there but the last for the Tigers, who have played there since 1934.
>
''Steve Humphreys made clear that the club's intention was to continue to play a minimum of four games a year at Leichhardt,'' Byrne said. ''My intention as the local mayor is to stand up for Tigers fans and our local businesses and ensure that that happens.
Advertisement
>
''If there's a new acting CEO there now and there is further discussion about abandoning the ground, I'll be getting in contact with him urgently to explain that that's unacceptable.''
>
The Tigers have had up to four home venues in recent seasons - Campbelltown Stadium, Allianz Stadium, ANZ Stadium and Leichhardt Oval. Financial incentives make it attractive for the club to play more games at ANZ Stadium next year.
>
Byrne said Leichhardt Council had a ''master plan'' to upgrade the oval ''so it is more profitable for the club to play games there'', including increasing the amount of allocated seating. However, he said the council could not fund the project alone and required help from the state government and NRL.
>
But that is unlikely to happen. In November last year, NSW Sport and Recreation Minister Graham Annesley released a strategy that stated the NSW government's funding focus would be on major venues, effectively leaving a question mark over suburban grounds such as those at Brookvale, Kogarah, Campbelltown and Leichhardt.
>
''The state government's stadia strategy basically said they wouldn't invest a single dollar more in the upgrade of suburban grounds,'' Byrne said. ''Just a couple of weeks ago, they floated the idea of spending a quarter of a billion dollars on upgrading Homebush [ANZ Stadium]. Spending that kind of money on a white elephant, while walking away from suburban rugby league grounds, is not what rugby league fans want.
>
''With the right scheduling, more often than not, Leichhardt is filled to capacity. It is much, much better for rugby league and for the Tigers to have 20,000 people at Leichhardt than at Homebush. Leichhardt and other councils need to step up but we can't do it by ourselves. It has to be a partnership.''
>
At Friday night's game, the Tigers celebrated the 100th anniversary of the Keith Barnes Stand, named after the former Balmain, NSW and Kangaroos fullback and sports administrator.
>
''Following each Balmain game at Leichhardt, the players, officials and their wives would often meet there for a drink,'' Barnes said. ''It became a great place for everyone to socialise together.''
>
Byrne called on the state government to reconsider its approach to suburban grounds.
>
''We've put a lot of money into the ground,'' he said. ''State governments walking away from their responsibilities to suburban grounds is a recipe for the spiritual home of the Tigers and other original clubs' grounds to be abandoned altogether.''
>
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/mayor-to-bare-teeth-if-tigers-move-away-20130720-2qb1u.html#ixzz2Zd7Cv9CB

Dont know where this rumour came from, Mayer said recently:

What costs are involved in Wests Tigers playing games at Campbelltown Sports Stadium and Leichhardt Oval and what is their future?
>
To give away specific figures would be reckless. It’s fair to say though that the venues cost the Club anywhere between $50-70k to run on a game-by-game basis subject to the size of the crowd etc.
>
At the moment, when you’re playing games at smaller venues and the crowds don’t show up, it’s very easy to lose money. We need to be smart about how we do this going forward.
>
The State Government and the NRL have made it very clear they’re looking at rationalizing stadia. We’re a very big part of that conversation.
>
Obviously Campbelltown and Leichhardt are important to the Club. The number of games we play at these stadiums over the next few years is a discussion point, but the mix of three venues is likely to stay constant over the next few years.
 
I'm sure once the Tigers start manning up with their performances Tigers fan will start returning in numbers

Maybe have a serious look at membership packages as well
 
Well from what i can gather the Tigers have received very little support from a Greens dominated local councils. Maybe Leichardt mayor should have a discussion with the Balmain mayor about approving the redevelopment of the leagues club site.
 
It would also help if the games were played at times that attract the largest possible crowd to the venue

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Darcy can go the way of Paul Lake and STFU quite frankly.

They offer zero real support for the club and in the case of Leichhardt stand in the way of a development which would aid the JV but still want their ground hire fees for their bottom line.
 
Byrne is an absolute wally. As Ink pointed out, look at Mayer's comments this week. There's also no comment from the club in the article, showing its all hearsay.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@smeghead said:
Darcy can go the way of Paul Lake and STFU quite frankly.

They offer zero real support for the club and in the case of Leichhardt stand in the way of a development which would aid the JV but still want their ground hire fees for their bottom line.

That was my initial understanding of the situation. Bit rich of him to cry foul if the Tigers leave the place, but it has remain a financially viable option for Wests Tigers to continue to play there.
 
@innsaneink said:
''If there's a new acting CEO there now and there is further discussion about abandoning the ground, I'll be getting in contact with him urgently to explain that that's unacceptable.''

Well, I was somewhat concerned, but I know I no longer need to worry now Byrne is on the case.
 
It wouldn't surprise me if the club pulled up stumps from Leichhardt.
Any promises the club made while Humphreys was CEO are in the waste paper bin.

I would hope any plans the Club has to move would be met with stern opposition from the fans.
People power should and can make things difficult for them.
 
@gallagher said:
Our board is too gutless and too stupid to make profiable decisions.

Well most would argue the stupidest decision would be the most profitable. That would be a complete full time move to either Homebush or Moore Park
 
Not sure how any kind of upgrade at this stage will make Leichhardt's life span improve that wouldn't involve millions upon millions of dollars. I'm sure its money better spent elsewhere as far as the state government goes. I don't think it will be next yr, but i don't think it takes a rocket scientist to work out we probably don't have longer than 5 yrs or so there.
 
Because it ignores tradition and while bottom line profitable because of the guaranteed revenue stream it would IMHO drastically reduce the uptake of membership and dilute the supporter base.

The fans will still be there in the good times but that bandwagon unhitches pretty quickly.

We are not a Souths or Bulldogs with a traditionally massive supporter base
 
@smeghead said:
Because it ignores tradition and while bottom line profitable because of the guaranteed revenue stream it would IMHO drastically reduce the uptake of membership and dilute the supporter base.

The fans will still be there in the good times but that bandwagon unhitches pretty quickly.

We are not a Souths or Bulldogs with a traditionally massive supporter base

I agree with the bandwagon theory. But I'd rather get 7k at Homebush ( which has never happened mind you) and pull in a profit than get 7k at LO or CSS and cop a loss.

Expansion is happening and I dont think there is a gaurantee that Sydney clubs wont be culled. We need to be a smarter club than we are ATM.
 
I think ashift to 3 - 3 - 6 is a more reasonable first step if they were going to look at that route
 
@smeghead said:
I think ashift to 3 - 3 - 6 is a more reasonable first step if they were going to look at that route

Yeah Id say thats the next step.
Humpty put personal popularity ahead of sense when he returned a game to each suburban ground but also included an unpopular SCG deal
Yes, an increase in sponsorship during his tenure probably covered that move….probably ended up square in the long run possibly instead of in the black
 
3-3-6 for sure. As I said, too gutless and too stupid to do anything else. Unless I'm under estimating Mayer.
 
Surely it's not all about making money.

Playing at these "money" grounds are a soft option.
Can't our board and management work out another revenue stream ?
The people love Leichhardt …. Doesn't that count for anything ?
 
Back
Top