More bad behaviour

@ said:
Wow, drama!

Where is Greenburg? Still on holidays? Every day Pascoe is looking more and more a saint while the many bludging, indecent NRL footballers continue to earn a motza living off the NRL.
 
I can’t say what I think about Inglis’s result, but he should not buy lottery tickets again,nrl and other businesses are scared of minority groups, in particular Kooris, the rest of us should be screaming discrimination regarding this mob, I live in Pt Stephens Nsw , they have claimed the good bits and was given to them,but don’t want the bits where the rest of us live, I see the results of this prosperity at the RSL club, where it goes through the pokies, in the meantime , I did 46 years of shift work and am battling Centrelink for payment
 
@ said:
@ said:
Wow. Just when you think Greenburg cant act any shadier.

And the scumbag is still on holidays ….
Most likely he’s in Jerusalem nutting his head against the wailing wall
:laughing:

I’d say that the major shareholders for broadcast rights would be worried about the public view of their product
 
To be fair to Greenberg all he did was give Inglis a reference along with probably 20 other people like Rusty and Andrew Denton. It’s the magistrate who needs to be held accountable. I imagine if it was your normal 33 year old they would have the book thrown at them
 
@ said:
To be fair to Greenberg all he did was give Inglis a reference along with probably 20 other people like Rusty and Andrew Denton. It’s the magistrate who needs to be held accountable. I imagine if it was your normal 33 year old they would have the book thrown at them

No, people are responsible for the references they right and who they right them for. The act of providing reference implies support, esteem and trust. That the reference was provided to Inglis to ameliorate a drink driving charge, when coming back from a NRL sanctioned and sponsored event, says as much for Greenburg as for Inglis. By his actions Inglis let Greenburg, the NRL and Souths down.

Shows how ramshackle the NRL PR is- if they knew it was an event with alcohol and a broad mixing, social event afterwards why the hell didnt they just hire a driver to take inglis there and back- not a huge expense in light of the PR damage. Amateur hour at NRL HQ yet again - and these professionals seek to whack WT for a supposed transgression that still cant be adequately explained and supported by evidence.
 
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!
 
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Yet Pascoe gets de-registered.
 
There is no leadership from the hierarchy. The NRL drifts from one bad headline to the next because idiots like Napa believe they can get away with this behaviour without serious repercussions. Suspend him and others for a year without pay and make them work during the suspension.

The hard questions need to be asked about these films. Why now after such a long time did they surface, conveniently after Napa departs the Roosters. Was this a coincidence or is there more to this? Until an impartial investigation is conducted the integrity of the NRL and its processes remain in question.
 
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Mate ….1.0? I think you meant 0.1\. That is double 0.05, the legal limit. At 1.0, he'd be dead.
 
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Both Melb and Cronulla have received sanctions for the stuff you mentioned that they were responsible for.
Are you saying Souths should cop a fine for Inglis being over the limit.
 
@ said:
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Mate ….1.0? I think you meant 0.1\. That is double 0.05, the legal limit. At 1.0, he'd be dead.

For anybody that has been unfortunate enough to hear GI the cretin speak, brain-death would be a legitimate excuse.
Just hope he can get out of this cycle of DD, DV and signing false contracts…......his community needs a role model :unamused: :brick: :deadhorse:
 
Maybe the wrong thread but I think it fits - so so so glad to see those two morons masquerading as Aussie sportsmen knocked out of the Australian Open today - tools and pretenders both of them.
 
@ said:
Maybe the wrong thread but I think it fits - so so so glad to see those two morons masquerading as Aussie sportsmen knocked out of the Australian Open today - tools and pretenders both of them.

Wrong thread but right sentiment! Watch their matches joyfully hoping for a crushing defeat…they didn't disappoint as usual. Love ya Bern and Nicky!!!! The invertebrate twins
 
@ said:
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Mate ….1.0? I think you meant 0.1\. That is double 0.05, the legal limit. At 1.0, he'd be dead.

You're correct - but if some one were dead better the drunk than an innocent bystander.
 
@ said:
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Both Melb and Cronulla have received sanctions for the stuff you mentioned that they were responsible for.
Are you saying Souths should cop a fine for Inglis being over the limit.

Ingles is a player, Sharks are a team?????
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Both Melb and Cronulla have received sanctions for the stuff you mentioned that they were responsible for.
Are you saying Souths should cop a fine for Inglis being over the limit.

Ingles is a player, Sharks are a team?????

That’s a pretty weak retort Russell. You’d have been better off saying nothing.
 
@ said:
There is no leadership from the hierarchy. The NRL drifts from one bad headline to the next because idiots like Napa believe they can get away with this behaviour without serious repercussions. Suspend him and others for a year without pay and make them work during the suspension.

The hard questions need to be asked about these films. Why now after such a long time did they surface, conveniently after Napa departs the Roosters. Was this a coincidence or is there more to this? Until an impartial investigation is conducted the integrity of the NRL and its processes remain in question.

It was obviously covered up by the rorters. I'm sure the integrity unit will look in to the rorters not notifying them. :roll :roll
 
@ said:
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Both Melb and Cronulla have received sanctions for the stuff you mentioned that they were responsible for.
Are you saying Souths should cop a fine for Inglis being over the limit.

The sharks still haven't been sanctioned over their cap rorting - should be an interesting outcome.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Both Melb and Cronulla have received sanctions for the stuff you mentioned that they were responsible for.
Are you saying Souths should cop a fine for Inglis being over the limit.

Inglis is a player, Sharks are a team?????

That’s a pretty weak retort Russell. You’d have been better off saying nothing.

You obviously did not understand my post either. Two separate things.

Well then - no Souths should not be fined but Inglis should have taken a much harsher penalty - giving him a reference is absolutely ridiculous.

Personally I think both Inglis and the Sharks have had enough chances. - both should be deregistered.

Good enough for a small indiscretion by Pascoe - it is certainly good enough for multiple offenders.

Strong enough GNR
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
How many times must players and teams transgress before suffering consequences fitting the crimes.

Ingles - cap rorting, hitting women, high range drink driving (probably over 1.0 in Dubbo).

Sharks - Peptides, cap rorting, breaking NRL instructions, team drinking indiscretions.

Just a joke NRL management are not worth a bean,

BUT… grab the Tigers... Seriously!!!

Both Melb and Cronulla have received sanctions for the stuff you mentioned that they were responsible for.
Are you saying Souths should cop a fine for Inglis being over the limit.

The sharks still haven't been sanctioned over their cap rorting - should be an interesting outcome.

Anything short of them being booted out of the comp will be met with tears from Russell.

Poor old tigers, treated harshly again, its just not fair…
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top