Funny that supporters want hard, tough, enforcers on the field who are total angels off-field.
Sometimes you need some lunatics off-field who can bring that unique aggression on-field.
First off, there are plenty of players with tough on-field approaches who don't have bad reputations off it. Jesse Bromwich, say. Even Jared Waerea-Hargreaves unless I'm forgetting something. Josh Jackson. Matt Scott. James Graham. Sam Burgess. And so on.
Second, I think there's a difference between a bit of low-level impetuousness of youth type misdemeanour activity and your full-on Greg Bird or Matt Lodge type thuggery. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of Nate Myles but the kind of things he's got in trouble for - especially given he was pretty young at the time - are really just bucks do gone wrong type of efforts. Slap on the wrist and a fine.
Basically what I'm saying is the real scumbags are relatively few and far between and I hope my club doesn't feel the need to hire any of them because of some supposed correlation between being a complete wit off the field and being tough on it.
I totally get what you are saying, but I don't think you can just split on and off-field behaviours into two pools. Some incidents on-field are just as bad.
I would also say we would be surprised if all dirty laundry was aired on all players. I've heard things from reliable people, things that don't go public and it applies to the behaviour of a very broad number of players.
Specific to the players you have mentioned, Bromwich and Scott are not enforcers and don't hurt people. They do tough quality metres just like Woodsie does.
JWH is more of the enforcer type and has been suspended, what, 9 times?
James Graham can absolutely be a loose cannon - the Adam Reynolds charge and associated ref abuse, biting suspension on Billy Slater, association with verbal abuse of Jayne Azzopardi.
I just think there is a really fine line, as I've said before, between enforcer/intimidator and erring on the wrong side of trouble. I do not ever condone criminal activity, especially violence against women, but there are other incidents which are not so severe but put players into that "no Dheads" policy.
I'm totally happy for Tigers to avoid the peanut players, but on the other hand lots of supporters bemoan how we aren't tough or intimidating enough, and I see a correlation.
Even our most recent enforcer-type, Marty Taupau, so many people were upset he left, and he definitely