cqtiger
Well-known member
@happy tiger said:@cqtiger said:@Balmain Boy said:The NRL could also look at treating all clubs equally. Both through head office and referees the bias towards the top clubs is despicable.
How are fans of the bottom clubs supposed to get excited when they repeatedly get dudded by the richer clubs? It gets boring after a while…
Look at the inequality of the judiciary, the salary cap + tpas, tv scheduling, developing juniors. If you're not rich you've got nothing to share.
Gotta agree BB, this garbage that all clubs have the same salary cap but the top clubs just manage their's better is utter BS.
I think the reason our cap is in a mess is because we are forced to pay overs or back end deals to try and stay competitive.
Until the NRL publish players salaries and compare them to their clubs salary cap it will remain unfair. I will even accept the real contract figures released without actual names if that keeps people happy. That way when I see that no Bronco, Bulldog or Roosters players earn over $300k From their club, I'll know how fair the salary cap really is.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
So does that mean that every person on the planet's salaries should become public property CQ ??
Never gonna happen
Why do you always go to the extreme as your argument?
We know what a lot of professions are on now. You see salaries advertised in the newspapers. Take a look at SEEK, do a search on Salaries - there are positions vacant and advertised from $30k to over $200k.
Do I know who's on what? No, but it's not hard to tell that a receptionist at Richard Matthews Real Estate will earn around $45k. It's in black & white on Seek.
I can understand that you wouldn't want the world to know that you earn $195k so you use a second accounting book.
My salary is currently $75k. It's the lowest paid job I've had in over 30 years but I'm content at my age. It's better than most but less than others.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_