Plodders , Nuffies and Fringies

[happy_tiger]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

 

[happy_tiger]

And does wrongness of head cover all or just Plodders

 

[tiger_one]

Your ranking sounds great, except plodder infers he's part of the team while a fringy sort of comes and goes depending on injuries etc. A nuffy is what it says - a nuffy!!

 

[happy_tiger]

Your ranking sounds great, except plodder infers he's part of the team while a fringy sort of comes and goes depending on injuries etc. A nuffy is what it says - a nuffy!!

Fringy elsewhere ...superstar at the WT's

Adam Blair ......great at Storm ...nuffy or plodder here ..gets confusing for the newbies ...even Forum superstars like myself question their rankings

 

[hobbo1]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

 

[happy_tiger]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

What about MCK , Rowdy .....Fringies maybe ??

 

[hobbo1]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

What about MCK , Rowdy .....Fringies maybe ??

Nuffies mate

 

[happy_tiger]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

 

[hobbo1]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

Name names

 

[happy_tiger]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

Name names

MCK , Drinkwater , Taupau ,


And halves aren't backs or forwards


We need to make this more official ...you can't throw around highly technical terms if they aren't correct

A player will sue the Forum ...."i'm not a plodder ,I'm a nuffy "

 

[hobbo1]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

Name names

MCK , Drinkwater , Taupau ,


And halves aren't backs or forwards


We need to make this more official ...you can't throw around highly technical terms if they aren't correct

A player will sue the Forum ...."i'm not a plodder ,I'm a nuffy "

MCK ...nuffie
Drinkwater ...nuffie
Taupau...bordering on plodderism

Halves come under nuffies

 

[happy_tiger]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

Name names

MCK , Drinkwater , Taupau ,


And halves aren't backs or forwards


We need to make this more official ...you can't throw around highly technical terms if they aren't correct

A player will sue the Forum ...."i'm not a plodder ,I'm a nuffy "

MCK ...nuffie
Drinkwater ...nuffie
Taupau...bordering on plodderism

Halves come under nuffies

but MCK wants to be a plodder

 

[hobbo1]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

Name names

MCK , Drinkwater , Taupau ,


And halves aren't backs or forwards


We need to make this more official ...you can't throw around highly technical terms if they aren't correct

A player will sue the Forum ...."i'm not a plodder ,I'm a nuffy "

MCK ...nuffie
Drinkwater ...nuffie
Taupau...bordering on plodderism

Halves come under nuffies

but MCK wants to be a plodder

Then he needs to play more games in the forwards

 

[happy_tiger]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

Name names

MCK , Drinkwater , Taupau ,


And halves aren't backs or forwards


We need to make this more official ...you can't throw around highly technical terms if they aren't correct

A player will sue the Forum ...."i'm not a plodder ,I'm a nuffy "

MCK ...nuffie
Drinkwater ...nuffie
Taupau...bordering on plodderism

Halves come under nuffies

but MCK wants to be a plodder

Then he needs to play more games in the forwards

But his position is a utility role ....are you saying Madge sees him as a nuffy rather than a plodder

Can see the next back page of the DT "MCK: I'm A PLODDER "

 

[Alex Seyfarth's #1 Fan]

I thought nuffies were players we thought might be good, but turned out to be absolute duds.

 

[hobbo1]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Also we sign so many fringies ...played 4 games of NRL at a club when they have 9 injuries and 6 out playing SOO

Name names

MCK , Drinkwater , Taupau ,


And halves aren't backs or forwards


We need to make this more official ...you can't throw around highly technical terms if they aren't correct

A player will sue the Forum ...."i'm not a plodder ,I'm a nuffy "

MCK ...nuffie
Drinkwater ...nuffie
Taupau...bordering on plodderism

Halves come under nuffies

but MCK wants to be a plodder

Then he needs to play more games in the forwards

But his position is a utility role ....are you saying Madge sees him as a nuffy rather than a plodder

Can see the next back page of the DT "MCK: I'm A PLODDER "

Yes Madge sees him as a nuffie

 

[hobbo1]

I thought nuffies were players we thought might be good, but turned out to be absolute duds.

Depends if they were forwards or backs

 

[BAGNF05]

My head hurts.

Is this grounds for medical retirement 😉

 

[InBenjiWeTrust]

But we had a few plodders e.g. Sironens (I still think they are both plodders :blush: ), and somehow they are promoted to 'very good players'?? Does this mean a plodder may become 'a player', if he leaves the WT? :thinking_face:

 

[Geo]

All this special terminology we use must confuse new Forum members

Can we finally get a rating system

Is a nuffy better or worse than a plodder or is a Fringy a better signing than a nuffy

My opinion

1 Fringy
2 Plodder
3 Nuffy

Are we in agreeance ??

Plodders are forwards
Nuffies are backs
Fringe’s ain’t worth rating
Wrongness of head only applies to plodders .
Hope this helps !

Why are you encouraging him..