T
Tiger5150
Guest
@tigger said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1256838) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1256815) said:@softlaw said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1256765) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1256727) said:@softlaw said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1256705) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1256125) said:I tell you something I didnt see widely reported in MSM.
The Tres just reported that last quarter the US economy GREW by 33%!
That is pretty remarkable. The previous quarter it dropped by 31% which is terrifying but incredible turn around.
Those are annualised not quarterly figures.
Ummmmm no. Flat out wrong. The US economy grew by 33.1% in Q3, in a *quarter*, not annually.
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth
https://www.bea.gov/news/glance
The very first line in your first quoted source says:
"The US economy expanded by an **annualized** 33.1% in Q3 2020, beating forecasts of a 31% surge."
and the very first line in your second quoted source says:
"Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an **annual** rate of 33.1 percent"
I bolded the relevant word in each.
You are correct and I was wrong. Sorry about that. Impressive regardless.
I'm not sure how that works (with annualised percentages). I thought that a 31% drop would take you down to 69% of where you were. Then a 33% increase (on your 69% position) would bring you back to 91.8% of where you started. Which would be good under the circumstances but probably not anything to get too excited about.
Now you guys have got me wondering whether that's the correct way to look at those figures.
Any thoughts?
I think you are generally right (its not back where it started). I assume annualised means that the quarterly growth was 33.1/4 = 8.275% which is very impressive (especially in the COVID environment with lockdowns in Cali & NY), but this figure makes more sense.