Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

Status
Not open for further replies.
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon has hit a new low as a man by publicaly ridiculing a woman(Dr Ford) who claims attempted sexual assault by his nominee for the top judicial court in the land.Even people in his own party are aghast at this disgusting action.
This is the sort of behaviour i would expect from a dictator, if any leader of any major party in this or any other civilised country made a comment like that i would expect them to be removed from leadership immediately.It wont happen over there though

Dictators (real ones) engage is mass murder, and tend to centralize power and resources in their own hands.

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon called out a probable liar.

See the difference?

You show your prejudice by saying "probable" instead of "possible" just like Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.As i said i doubt if any other mainstream political leader would do the same as him

You're changing the subject.

You want to criticise him, go for it. His comments aren't helpful when his own side is in the ascendancy anyway.

But to say this makes him a dictator?? That's plain ridiculous and only hurts your own credibility.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon has hit a new low as a man by publicaly ridiculing a woman(Dr Ford) who claims attempted sexual assault by his nominee for the top judicial court in the land.Even people in his own party are aghast at this disgusting action.
This is the sort of behaviour i would expect from a dictator, if any leader of any major party in this or any other civilised country made a comment like that i would expect them to be removed from leadership immediately.It wont happen over there though

Dictators (real ones) engage is mass murder, and tend to centralize power and resources in their own hands.

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon called out a probable liar.

See the difference?

You show your prejudice by saying "probable" instead of "possible" just like Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.As i said i doubt if any other mainstream political leader would do the same as him

You're changing the subject.

You want to criticise him, go for it. His comments aren't helpful when his own side is in the ascendancy anyway.

But to say this makes him a dictator?? That's plain ridiculous and only hurts your own credibility.

I did not call him a dictator i said "This is the behaviour i would EXPECT from a dictator" His nomination will probably get accepted anyway on party lines but it is quite disgraceful to label people like he consistently does
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon has hit a new low as a man by publicaly ridiculing a woman(Dr Ford) who claims attempted sexual assault by his nominee for the top judicial court in the land.Even people in his own party are aghast at this disgusting action.
This is the sort of behaviour i would expect from a dictator, if any leader of any major party in this or any other civilised country made a comment like that i would expect them to be removed from leadership immediately.It wont happen over there though

Dictators (real ones) engage is mass murder, and tend to centralize power and resources in their own hands.

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon called out a probable liar.

See the difference?

You show your prejudice by saying "probable" instead of "possible" just like Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon.As i said i doubt if any other mainstream political leader would do the same as him

You're changing the subject.

You want to criticise him, go for it. His comments aren't helpful when his own side is in the ascendancy anyway.

But to say this makes him a dictator?? That's plain ridiculous and only hurts your own credibility.

Calling her a "probable liar" gives you zero credibility. It just makes you sound like a vile human.
 
@ said:
Calling her a "probable liar" gives you zero credibility. It just makes you sound like a vile human.

Not as vile as someone who resorts to personal insults as a first argument, Nelly.

I guess it makes the sex crimes investigator who said Ford's claims are not credible a vile human too.
 
@ said:
I did not call him a dictator i said "This is the behaviour i would EXPECT from a dictator" His nomination will probably get accepted anyway on party lines but it is quite disgraceful to label people like he consistently does

Behaviour you expect from a dictator … minus the mass killing and plundering.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Calling her a "probable liar" gives you zero credibility. It just makes you sound like a vile human.

Not as vile as someone who resorts to personal insults as a first argument, Nelly.

I guess it makes the sex crimes investigator who said Ford's claims are not credible a vile human too.

They may be, or they may have formed their view from a detailed assessment of the evidence as opposed to you who has formed the view because it suits your political agenda.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Calling her a "probable liar" gives you zero credibility. It just makes you sound like a vile human.

Not as vile as someone who resorts to personal insults as a first argument, Nelly.

I guess it makes the sex crimes investigator who said Ford's claims are not credible a vile human too.

They may be, or they may have formed their view from a detailed assessment of the evidence as opposed to you who has formed the view because it suits your political agenda.

I formed my view based on all the known facts… or lack of them, to be perfectly accurate. Including the investigator's 5 page memo which punched holes in Ford's testimony and concluded with her saying that no reasonable prosecutor would follow up this case.

Have you read it? Or did you just decide to butt in with your silly insults because you're bored with your own life, and decided you wanted to try and make others as miserable as you plainly are?

I am also aghast that an innocent man could be accused of the most vile and disgraceful of crimes in front of the entire world in order to advance a political objective, while the mainstream media plays along. Imagine being Brett Kavanaugh for the past 2 weeks. That's what is vile in all of this.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Calling her a "probable liar" gives you zero credibility. It just makes you sound like a vile human.

Not as vile as someone who resorts to personal insults as a first argument, Nelly.

I guess it makes the sex crimes investigator who said Ford's claims are not credible a vile human too.

They may be, or they may have formed their view from a detailed assessment of the evidence as opposed to you who has formed the view because it suits your political agenda.

I formed my view based on all the known facts… or lack of them, to be perfectly accurate. Including the investigator's 5 page memo which punched holes in Ford's testimony and concluded with her saying that no reasonable prosecutor would follow up this case.

Have you read it? Or did you just decide to butt in with your silly insults because you're bored with your own life, and decided you wanted to try and make others as miserable as you plainly are?

I am also aghast that an innocent man could be accused of the most vile and disgraceful of crimes in front of the entire world in order to advance a political objective, while the mainstream media plays along. Imagine being Brett Kavanaugh for the past 2 weeks. That's what is vile in all of this.

That's quite the hissy fit. I think you've been "triggered" to use one of your favourite expressions snowflake.

"I formed my view based on all the known facts". Really? Did you watch both of them give evidence. No? Just read something that suited you?

It's bad for him if it's untrue and it's bad for her if it's true. Unlike you I'm not going to go demonising either of them because I do or don't want him appointed.

My life's just fine too, thanks for your concern.
 
@ said:
That's quite the hissy fit. I think you've been "triggered" to use one of your favourite expressions snowflake.

"I formed my view based on all the known facts". Really? Did you watch both of them give evidence. No? Just read something that suited you?

It's bad for him if it's untrue and it's bad for her if it's true. Unlike you I'm not going to go demonising either of them because I do or don't want him appointed.

My life's just fine too, thanks for your concern.

:roll

Nelly is trying to hide his own inner-snowflake by accusing others of snowflakery. Classic !

I watched both testimonies and hours upon hours of the circus that masqueraded as the nomination hearing. But who cares about being informed and relying on facts, when you can summon the manly bravery of Nelly and throw limp wristed insults at people from behind the unaccountable safety of a computer monitor.

Nelly is the result of too much chlorine in the gene pool it seems.
 
Oh and just to be clear…. every assumption you have made about me during this slap down has been wrong.

That's a 100% strike rate !!!

Nelly must have fallen out of the stupid tree, and hit every branch twice on the way down.
 
@ said:
@ said:
That's quite the hissy fit. I think you've been "triggered" to use one of your favourite expressions snowflake.

"I formed my view based on all the known facts". Really? Did you watch both of them give evidence. No? Just read something that suited you?

It's bad for him if it's untrue and it's bad for her if it's true. Unlike you I'm not going to go demonising either of them because I do or don't want him appointed.

My life's just fine too, thanks for your concern.

:roll

Nelly is trying to hide his own inner-snowflake by accusing others of snowflakery. Classic !

I watched both testimonies and hours upon hours of the circus that masqueraded as the nomination hearing. But who cares about being informed and relying on facts, when you can summon the manly bravery of Nelly and throw limp wristed insults at people from behind the unaccountable safety of a computer monitor.

Nelly is the result of too much chlorine in the gene pool it seems.

Of course you did. If she's a probable liar you are an absolute guaranteed liar. You are also a probable flabby, basement dweller with a neck beard. Consider yourself foe'd.
 
He was made to look weak with the revelation that he inherited 413 million from his racist daddy, which brought his claims of being a self made billionaire into question. When he’s made to look weak, he does the only thing that will make him feel better. Lash out at someone weaker. Whether Kavanaugh is guilty or not, the general consensus is that Ford was sexually assaulted by somebody and was a victim. So at the very least he was mocking a victim of sexual assault. I’m long past the point of being surprised though. Whenever this Presidency hits rock bottom, he drills through the rock.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
That's quite the hissy fit. I think you've been "triggered" to use one of your favourite expressions snowflake.

"I formed my view based on all the known facts". Really? Did you watch both of them give evidence. No? Just read something that suited you?

It's bad for him if it's untrue and it's bad for her if it's true. Unlike you I'm not going to go demonising either of them because I do or don't want him appointed.

My life's just fine too, thanks for your concern.

:roll

Nelly is trying to hide his own inner-snowflake by accusing others of snowflakery. Classic !

I watched both testimonies and hours upon hours of the circus that masqueraded as the nomination hearing. But who cares about being informed and relying on facts, when you can summon the manly bravery of Nelly and throw limp wristed insults at people from behind the unaccountable safety of a computer monitor.

Nelly is the result of too much chlorine in the gene pool it seems.

Of course you did. If she's a probable liar you are an absolute guaranteed liar. You are also a probable flabby, basement dweller with a neck beard. Consider yourself foe'd.

You came in here throwing insults because of menopause or something, established you have no clue about what's currently going on in DC, established you have no clue about my own knowledge of the facts, and then went back to insults when your ignorance left you exposed.

You've have quite an eventful afternoon, haven't you Nelly.

At this stage i would question whether you know the difference between Brett Kavanaugh and Brett Kimmorley.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
That's quite the hissy fit. I think you've been "triggered" to use one of your favourite expressions snowflake.

"I formed my view based on all the known facts". Really? Did you watch both of them give evidence. No? Just read something that suited you?

It's bad for him if it's untrue and it's bad for her if it's true. Unlike you I'm not going to go demonising either of them because I do or don't want him appointed.

My life's just fine too, thanks for your concern.

:roll

Nelly is trying to hide his own inner-snowflake by accusing others of snowflakery. Classic !

I watched both testimonies and hours upon hours of the circus that masqueraded as the nomination hearing. But who cares about being informed and relying on facts, when you can summon the manly bravery of Nelly and throw limp wristed insults at people from behind the unaccountable safety of a computer monitor.

Nelly is the result of too much chlorine in the gene pool it seems.

Of course you did. If she's a probable liar you are an absolute guaranteed liar. You are also a probable flabby, basement dweller with a neck beard. Consider yourself foe'd.

You came in here throwing insults because of menopause or something, established you have no clue about what's currently going on in DC, established you have no clue about my own knowledge of the facts, and then went back to insults when your ignorance left you exposed.

You've have quite an eventful afternoon, haven't you Nelly.

At this stage i would question whether you know the difference between Brett Kavanaugh and Brett Kimmorley.

The FBI report has just come in and it seems that they have not found anyone who co- oberates the accusations.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Has Ivan Cleary left yet..

Save Ivan Hang Gould

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is still a twat

The absolutely disgraceful Democrats and the vile left wing in America have just guaranteed president Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon another six years.

:righton:
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Has Ivan Cleary left yet..

Save Ivan Hang Gould

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is still a twat

The absolutely disgraceful Democrats and the vile left wing in America have just guaranteed president Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon another six years.

:righton:

If the Dems win the mids, then what?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Has Ivan Cleary left yet..

Save Ivan Hang Gould

Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is still a twat

The absolutely disgraceful Democrats and the vile left wing in America have just guaranteed president Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon another six years.

:righton:

If the Dems win the mids, then what?

After the past month I don't think they will.

What are the dem's going to run on? Identity politics and race.

President Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon will run on his record which includes :- energy, trade, taxes, income, foreign policy, manufacturing, Judges, North Korea etc, etc.

He has achieved this in less than two years.

How good could it be in another two years.

Oh, did I mention the wall?

Sounds like a winning combination to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top