POLL: Should the club fold and handover/sell the licence?

OK, that's a new one - it's the supporters fault.



No, it doesn't allude to that at all. I have never suggested it wasn't beneficial. It certainly isn't noteworthy when it comes to the on-field performances.

You are a liar, and suggested that I would rather the club be in debt.

Your specific words are right there: "So you'd rather we were in debt eh?"


I'd rather we were winning football games.
this subject comes back again and again, it reminds me of that mangers fad on "how to show the results quickly" e.g. retrench, hire (expensive) consultants, increase salaries to the top management, rearrange the office desks and partitions etc.
All useless measures that cannot achieve anything, but are used as a good to "cover your ass first" that shows that "we do something".
IMHO, the old "if you cannot stand the heat, get out of the kitchen", before trying to convince everyone that it is too hot!
It looks like some people are like "if I am not happy with the club everyone must be unhappy, so lets destroy the club", and everyone who does not think as ME is irrelevant and against the best interest of the club!
The Tigers and Magpies already played a part in this NRL farce (1999), and there are plenty of other clubs that shall be sacrificed for the "good of the game"!
The NRL shall better spend their efforts to drastically improve the referring of the games!
 
this subject comes back again and again, it reminds me of that mangers fad on "how to show the results quickly" e.g. retrench, hire (expensive) consultants, increase salaries to the top management, rearrange the office desks and partitions etc.
All useless measures that cannot achieve anything, but are used as a good to "cover your ass first" that shows that "we do something".
IMHO, the old "if you cannot stand the heat, get out of the kitchen", before trying to convince everyone that it is too hot!
It looks like some people are like "if I am not happy with the club everyone must be unhappy, so lets destroy the club", and everyone who does not think as ME is irrelevant and against the best interest of the club!
The Tigers and Magpies already played a part in this NRL farce (1999), and there are plenty of other clubs that shall be sacrificed for the "good of the game"!
The NRL shall better spend their efforts to drastically improve the referring of the games!
What TF does any of this have to do with the post you quoted? Jesus...
 
What a stupid post . If the Tigers don’t meet your expectations, maybe it’s time for you to follow a team that meets your requirements.
 

I'm with this lass.
I want the team to become successful, not fold.
Same, I love this club. You can look at this situation glass half full or glass half empty. I loved madge hard, dude was charismatic and had the pleasure of shaking his hand once.

If after 3 and a half years of tumbling further down the ladder the club wants a new approach I say lets do it, cant get much worse
 
Obviously we all love the club and as long as it's making money, the NRL will keep us going.

The owners will never sell the NRL license as long as they're making money.

We've changed the board three times, the chairperson 3x, 4x CEOs and now we are onto our 5th Head Coach (7th incl interim coaches). There is nothing else we can do. We are still more likely to fail for the next 5 years than succeed. I'd rather fail with Madge and Sheens than with Ciraldo et al.
 
Obviously we all love the club and as long as it's making money, the NRL will keep us going.

The owners will never sell the NRL license as long as they're making money.

We've changed the board three times, the chairperson 3x, 4x CEOs and now we are onto our 5th Head Coach (7th incl interim coaches). There is nothing else we can do. We are still more likely to fail for the next 5 years than succeed. I'd rather fail with Madge and Sheens than with Ciraldo et al.
I can see some short term success coming with Sheens around.
 
Back
Top