I absolutely agree. Its almost impossible to have the opinion that Galvin is overrated without being labelled 'salty'. I still have the same opinion of Galvin now as i have when he was 17....
Galvin is an exceptional footballer. He has the instincts and the IQ as we all know, no one can deny that. However, the issue with Galvin is how it all fits and translates into first grade football, and specifically positionally wise. Galvin is 6ft 4-5, is slow (for a half) and has below par lateral movement and agiliry for a half. Attributes that cant be taught or learnt over time.
Galvin at 19 years old, in a young mans body is a half. By the time he's 22-24 he will not be a half... There are people that say he has a slight frame and he wont build mass etc etc, but you HAVE to build mass to be able to maintain a career in the NRL long term. Its a physically taxing game. Thats without mentioning natural body growth and strength in those early years.
Case in point, look at all the young 6ft2+ halves that have come into first grade in the last 20 years. Wade Graham, Luke Lewis, John Sutton, Curtis Sironen, Ryan Matterson and Matt Burton... Every single one of those players ended up in the backrow except Burton and even his best football wasnt in the halves.
Regardless what you think of him as a coach, Tim Sheens one of the best assessors of talent in the history of Rugby League identified Galvin as a lock.
That aside, Latu was the best junior rugby league prospect ive seen since Turbo. No one has dominated the juniors leagues more than he has in the last 10 years. He even made Feledy look like a prospect. I would honestly bet my house that Latu will be the real deal, provided he stays injury free... There's a reason the senior players wanted Latu starting 6 over Galvin long before the Galvin drama.
Long story short, Galvin is a good footballer but provided Latu stays injury free, this will be the time the WT will benefit in the long term.