weststigerman
Well-known member
@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1448799) said:@weststigerman said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1448773) said:@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1448721) said:People talking about signing Thompson. Do you actually think signing him for 4 years for 2.7 million is a good deal? You can't simply say getting him for 2 years at 500k is good value if in teh final years you're paying him 850k.
This is exactly like the Mbye situation. He was great value while the dogs were chipping in, then in the latter years his full salary was on us and we couldn't wait to offload him. Thompson is not the best prop in the league. I don't think he's in the top 5 and possibly not even in the top 10 props. He's worth about 500k at the most.
If we offered him a 3 year deal for 1.5 mil, with dogs chipping in 700k for 2 years, with a mutual option for the 4th season i could accept that. If we ended up paying more than 500k a year for him at any stage it's a loss.
When the Dogs signed him they thought he was one of if not the best forward in the game. Hence the big bucks. But he's not. I can't see anyone offering him that kind of money again.
After all the talk about how Hartigan won’t pay overs for players, do you really think we’ll take on a monster contract?
We’re more likely to miss out because another club wants to take on the entire contract amount.
Madge said in the MMM pod interview (on here a few days ago), that they would open the purse up for the right player, don’t know if this is the right player or not, but he sounds good?
Potentially, he started fairly average last year when he arrived as the “best prop in the world” but seems acclimatised to the NRL now. 3 years is right IMO.
Makes a lot of sense as the Dogs can’t even offer Vaughan a contract for 2023 so are probably making room.